Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pola Pemberitaan CNN, MetroTV, dan TVRI: Analisis Konten dan Perbandingan Media Nurulhuda, Nada Syifa; Pramudya, Aissyah Lintang; Amalia, Selma Dwi; Ritonga, Putra Hamonangan; Syaharani, Zevanya Praja; Narindra, Rochella Amalia; Wicaksana, Dika Hikmah; Widiastiwi, Alisha Reva; Camilla, Garneta Rizka; Sachmaso, Hana Humaira; Putri, Cinta Aisyah
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 2, No 12 (2025): July 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The mass media has a central role in shaping public opinion through agenda setting and framing mechanisms. This study aims to analyze the news reporting patterns applied by CNN Indonesia, MetroTV, and TVRI with a focus on the aspects of factuality, actuality, and accuracy. Through a content analysis approach, this study compares how the three media present certain issues and how the differences in these approaches have implications for public perception of an event. The results of the study show that each media has different news presentation characteristics: CNN Indonesia prioritizes speed and data visualization, MetroTV tends to be analytical with political nuances, while TVRI emphasizes an educational approach and neutrality. These differences reflect variations in framing information that have the potential to influence public opinion differently. This study is expected to contribute to strengthening media literacy and increasing public awareness of the importance of journalistic integrity in conveying information.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Batas Usia Minimal Calon Presiden dan Calon Wakil Presiden Dalam Putusan MK Nomor 90/Puu-Xxi/2023 Perspektif Etika Profesi dan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Muyassar, Alifia Nada; Putri, Khairunnisa Wiladi; Alya, Farah; Maniari, Elsa; Pramudya, Aissyah Lintang; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15567839

Abstract

The Constitutional Court (MK) has a crucial role in upholding the supremacy of law and the constitution in Indonesia. However, the independence and integrity of MK judges are in the spotlight in MK Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 which changes the provisions on the age limit for presidential and vice presidential candidates. This decision has sparked controversy due to allegations of violations of the code of ethics by one of the MK judges who has a conflict of interest with the party benefiting from the decision. This study aims to analyze the effect of violations of the code of ethics by MK judges on the legitimacy and acceptance of MK decisions. The research method used is juridical-normative with a statutory regulatory approach and analysis of decisions and their impacts. The results of the study show that violations of the code of ethics can damage public trust in the MK and give rise to debate about the validity of the resulting decisions. In addition, non-compliance with the code of ethics has the potential to weaken the independence of the judiciary and create a bad precedent for the enforcement of constitutional law in the future. Therefore, a stricter oversight mechanism is needed for MK judges as well as strict enforcement of sanctions to ensure that the resulting decisions remain objective and based on the principle of justice.