Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Pola Pemberitaan CNN, MetroTV, dan TVRI: Analisis Konten dan Perbandingan Media Nurulhuda, Nada Syifa; Pramudya, Aissyah Lintang; Amalia, Selma Dwi; Ritonga, Putra Hamonangan; Syaharani, Zevanya Praja; Narindra, Rochella Amalia; Wicaksana, Dika Hikmah; Widiastiwi, Alisha Reva; Camilla, Garneta Rizka; Sachmaso, Hana Humaira; Putri, Cinta Aisyah
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 2, No 12 (2025): July 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The mass media has a central role in shaping public opinion through agenda setting and framing mechanisms. This study aims to analyze the news reporting patterns applied by CNN Indonesia, MetroTV, and TVRI with a focus on the aspects of factuality, actuality, and accuracy. Through a content analysis approach, this study compares how the three media present certain issues and how the differences in these approaches have implications for public perception of an event. The results of the study show that each media has different news presentation characteristics: CNN Indonesia prioritizes speed and data visualization, MetroTV tends to be analytical with political nuances, while TVRI emphasizes an educational approach and neutrality. These differences reflect variations in framing information that have the potential to influence public opinion differently. This study is expected to contribute to strengthening media literacy and increasing public awareness of the importance of journalistic integrity in conveying information.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Serta Legalitas Penahanan Jaminan Oleh Kreditur: Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No 1733 K/PDT/2014 Amalia, Selma Dwi; Maula, Putri Ni’matul; Firdaus, Muhammad Bintang; Purnama, Rendika; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Credit agreements as principal agreements are often followed by additional agreements such as collateral, which are interrelated in their implementation. This study aims to analyze the legal relationship between the principal agreement (credit agreement) and additional agreement (collateral) and the legality of collateral retention by creditors in the case of Supreme Court Decision No. 1733 K/Pdt/2014. The background of this study is based on a dispute between debtors and creditors regarding default, debt collection that is not in accordance with the agreement, and retention of collateral certificates without a clear legal basis. The research method used is a normative legal approach with an analysis of legal documents and court decisions. The results of the study indicate that credit agreements as principal agreements have direct implications for the validity of additional agreements, especially in terms of collateral execution. The Supreme Court ruled that the creditor's action of withholding collateral without a legal basis violated the principles of contract law, so that some of the debtor's demands were granted. In conclusion, this case emphasizes the importance of transparency and balance of rights and obligations in credit agreements to ensure legal certainty for the parties.
HARMONISASI REGULASI HUKUM NASIONAL DAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP INDUSTRI KELAPA SAWIT INDONESIA YANG BERDAMPAK PADA PERUBAHAN IKLIM GLOBAL Amalia, Selma Dwi
Journal Social Sciences and Humanioran Review Vol. 1 No. 02 (2024): MARCH
Publisher : Zhata Institut

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64578/jsshr.v1i02.30

Abstract

Indonesia is the country with the largest palm oil commodity in the world. This can be proven by the extensive palm oil plantations throughout Indonesia, especially in the provinces of Riau, West Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan, North Sumatra and East Kalimantan. However, the palm oil industry actually has a negative impact on the environment, because every stage of palm oil processing can produce gasses that cause greenhouse gasses. Indonesia feels a dilemma with the presence of international regulations in the Paris Agreement. On the one hand, there is Indonesia's push to ratify the agreement and support the global greenhouse gas reduction mission. But on the other hand, the Indonesian palm oil industry is a contributor to the country's foreign exchange which can improve the Indonesian economy. By using normative juridical methods through a statutory approach, and an analytical approach, the author finds two problem formulations (1) harmonization of national law and international law regarding Indonesia's main palm oil export commodity, (2) the role of the Indonesian government in implementing the ratified agreement regarding climate change international. Keywords: Palm Oil, Paris Agreement, and Climate
Problematika Hukum Pagar Laut yang Berdampak pada Mata Pencaharian Nelayan di Tangerang, Banten Amalia, Selma Dwi; Gulshan, Nadia; Ningrum, Chantika Gina; Izazqi, Radhitya
Forschungsforum Law Journal Vol 2 No 02 (2025): MEI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/flj.v2i02.10822

Abstract

Abstract: Various legal, economic, social, and environmental issues have arisen due to the construction of a 30.16-kilometer-long sea barrier in the waters of Tangerang. The presence of this barrier prevents fishermen from accessing their fishing grounds, leading to a decline in fish catch, increased operational costs, and frequent vessel damage. Additionally, the sea barrier negatively impacts the marine ecosystem by disrupting water flow and accelerating sedimentation, which can harm marine habitats. From a legal perspective, the sea barrier violates several national laws and international law under UNCLOS. This study employs a normative juridical method with a statutory and case study approach. The findings indicate that the construction of the sea barrier benefits business interests more than the well-being of coastal communities, contradicting the principles of social justice and public interest. Therefore, the government must take firm legal action and implement policies that prioritize the interests of affected communities to mitigate the negative social and environmental impacts of the sea barrier. Keywords: Sea Barrier, Fishermen, Maritime Law, Social Justice, UNCLOS.