Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SIGn Jurnal Hukum Journal of Judicial Review Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities
Weley, Nadia Carolina
Unknown Affiliation
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Behind Closed Lenses: Analyzing the Efficacy of Personal Data Protection Laws in Combatting Hidden Cameras Weley, Nadia Carolina; Amboro, Florianus Yudhi Priyo; Seroja, Triana Dewi
Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 26 No. 1 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v26i1.9158

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of personal data protection against hidden camera recordings in Batam City, which are used to identify a person and used for personal purposes, a problem in Indonesia despite the issuance of Act Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection. This research focuses on the aspects of legal protection and sanctions received by perpetrators of personal data and privacy sharing crimes; this study also identifies the challenges and opportunities Indonesian people face regarding their privacy in public places. The concept of personal data protection is analyzed through an empirical legal research method with a descriptive-qualitative approach, considering the current Indonesian legal framework. This research also involves Soerjono Soekanto's Theory of Legal Effectiveness and Chambliss and Seidman's Theory of the Working of Law, which will assist in elaborating the research. This research highlights the importance of public awareness and the role of supervisory agencies in addressing the risks of privacy-infringing camera recordings. The results show the need for a collaborative strategy between the government and society to strengthen personal data protection. The results of this study can assess the effectiveness of the enforcement of the PDP Law in Batam City through five factors and how the regulation in Indonesia overshadows the problems faced, such as the lack of law enforcement roles in Batam City and the lack of reminders such as facilities that can be a bridge for the public to know the prohibition of installing hidden cameras in public places that can endanger the public.
Kepastian Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pidana Korporasi atas Penyalahgunaan Data Pribadi di Indonesia Situmeang, Ampuan; Weley, Nadia Carolina; Disemadi, Hari Sutra
Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities Vol. 23 (2025): Proceedings of Seminar Nasional Kebaharuan KUHP Nasional dan Urgensi Pembaharuan KUH
Publisher : UM Purwokerto Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/pssh.v23i.1544

Abstract

Dalam beberapa tahun terakhir, pelanggaran data pribadi oleh korporasi di Indonesia meningkat secara signifikan, menunjukkan perlunya kepastian hukum dalam pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kepastian hukum dalam pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi atas penyalahgunaan data pribadi di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia telah memiliki kerangka hukum yang jelas dan tegas dalam pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi atas penyalahgunaan data pribadi. UU PDP menetapkan mekanisme strict liability, yang memastikan korporasi tetap bertanggung jawab meskipun pelanggaran dilakukan oleh individu dalam perusahaan. Sanksi tegas berupa denda hingga 2% dari pendapatan tahunan, pencabutan izin usaha, serta hukuman pidana bagi pengurus korporasi memperkuat aspek kepastian hukum.
Transplanting the Right of Publicity as a Property Right over AI Voice Cloning: A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia, Thailand, the US, and the EU Hariyanto, Rodger Lui; Weley, Nadia Carolina; Hutauruk, Rufinus Hotmaulana
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 2: Oktober 2025 - Maret 2026
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i2.649

Abstract

The exploitation of voice identity by artificial intelligence development and user companies through voice cloning technology has caused tangible economic losses. The fundamental issue lies within the positive legal systems in Indonesia and Thailand, which experience qualification barriers. Civil instruments such as torts become paralyzed because cyber law, intellectual property, and data protection regimes fail to classify voice as a commercial property right object. Therefore, this research aims to comparatively analyze these civil law qualification barriers using the United States and the European Union as benchmarks, while simultaneously formulating a prescriptive transplantation of the right of publicity doctrine. This normative legal research utilizes the statute approach, comparative approach, and conceptual approach to comprehensively dissect domestic instruments and foreign case law. The results of the comparative analysis affirm the United States’ supremacy in recognising voice as a property right. This protection standard is refined by an ethical restriction layer in the form of an absolute prohibition as a default prohibition from the European Union. Overcoming domestic paralysis requires reconceptualizing property boundaries within the Civil Code. Recognizing voice as an intangible property will directly activate the tort lawsuit instrument. This activation aims to demand the disgorgement of profits from entities that develop artificial intelligence without authorisation and train algorithms without authorisation. This lawsuit also applies to commercial user entities conducting advertising through voice cloning. This research concludes that the adoption of the right of publicity requires the formulation of specific regulations (lex specialis) to protect personality rights. These regulations must explicitly separate corporate liability and adopt a layered consent standard. These rules must also contain a fair use exception to maintain a balance between economic property protection and freedom of expression in society.
Co-Authors Disemadi, Hari Sutra FL. Yudhi Priyo Amboro, FL. Yudhi Priyo Hariyanto, Rodger Lui Hutauruk, Rufinus Hotmaulana Situmeang, Ampuan Triana Dewi Seroja