Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.431
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum Jurnal Akta Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Darma Agung Law Development Journal IBLAM Law Review Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge
Lufsiana, Lufsiana
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS YURIDIS KEWENANGAN TERAPIS GIGI DAN MULUT PASKA DISAHKANNYA KEPMENKES NO 671 TAHUN 2022 Nerito, Prima; Sutarno, Sutarno; Lufsiana, Lufsiana
JURNAL DARMA AGUNG Vol 31 No 3 (2023): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Darma Agung (LPPM_UDA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46930/ojsuda.v31i3.3457

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konflik norma antara Permenkes No 20 tahun 2016 tentang izin praktik Terapis Gigi dan Mulut dengan KMK 671 tahun 2022 tentang kompetensi Terapis Gigi dan Mulut, serta menganalisis perlindungan hukum bagi pasien pada praktek mandiri Terapis Gigi dan Mulut. Penelitian ini berbentuk penelitian hukum yuridis normatif atau Kepustakaan dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan komparatif. Hasil penelitian ini meliputi : 1) adanya konflik norma berupa disharmonisasi pada Permenkes No 20 tahun 2016 dan KMK No 671 tahun 2020 dalam bentuk pasal-pasal yang isinya bertentangan. Pasal-pasal tersebut mengatur terkait kewenangan dan kompetensi terapis gigi dan mulut dalam melakukan tindakan kuratif sederhana; 2) Perlindungan hukum pasien pada praktik mandiri Terapis gigi dan mulut belum diatur secara khusus, namun untuk sanksi terhadap pelanggaran yang Terapis Gigi dan Mulut diatur dalam pasal 28 dan 29 PMK No 20 tahun 2016. Upaya untuk perlindungan hukum pasien perlu dibentuk lembaga khusus untuk melakukan pengawasan terhadap praktik mandiri Terapis Gigi dan Mulut sehingga dapat meminimalisir adanya pelanggaran yang terjadi serta sebagai upaya untuk melindungi pasien
Restoring Victims of Wrongful Arrest: Automatic Compensation through a Parallel Justice Approach Susilo, Erwin; Negara, Dharma Setiawan; Lufsiana, Lufsiana
Law Development Journal Vol 7, No 3 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.7.3.375-391

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the weaknesses of the existing compensation mechanism for victims of wrongful arrest in the criminal justice system and to propose a reform model based on the principle of Parallel Justice (PJ). Although Indonesian law, particularly the Criminal Procedure Code and Government Regulation No. 92/2015, already provides a legal basis for compensation, the mechanism remains petition-based and dependent on victims’ initiative through pre-trial proceedings. Such a passive system creates structural injustice and fails to guarantee effective recovery for victims of state error. The research method used in this study is normative legal research, employing statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The statutory approach is applied to examine the positive law in Indonesia regarding compensation. The conceptual approach is used to analyze and reformulate the theory of compensation by incorporating the PJ framework developed by Susan Herman, which emphasizes proactive victim restoration. The comparative approach reviews practices in other jurisdictions such as Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, and the United States to identify models of automatic compensation that can be adapted into the Indonesian context. The novelty in this research is the application of the Parallel Justice concept—originally designed for crime victims in general—to the context of wrongful arrest caused by state authorities. This adaptation provides a new paradigm in Indonesian criminal procedure by positioning victims of wrongful arrest not merely as claimants but as individuals entitled to automatic state responsibility. Based on the research, it is concluded that adopting the PJ approach can create a more responsive, victim-oriented, and automatic compensation system. Such reform would strengthen the protection of human rights, enhance public trust in the legal system, and ensure that victims of wrongful arrest are restored fairly, quickly, and comprehensively.
The Innovation of Criminal Law Interpretation Model in Indonesia through Rule of Lenity Approach Susilo, Erwin; Negara, Dharma Setiawan; Lufsiana, Lufsiana
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 3 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i3.47103

Abstract

This research aims to explore and develop an innovative concept of criminal law interpretation in Indonesia through the Rule of Lenity (RoL) approach. The RoL principle, originating from the common law system, emphasizes that ambiguous criminal provisions must be interpreted narrowly and always in favor of the defendant. Within Indonesia’s civil law system, adopting RoL has the potential to strengthen legal certainty, safeguard defendants’ human rights, and reduce the risk of arbitrariness in law enforcement practices. The study employs normative legal research methods, focusing on theoretical foundations of the principle of legality, established doctrines of statutory interpretation, and comparative analysis of RoL application in common law jurisdictions, particularly the United States. The findings suggest that RoL in Indonesia should only serve as a last resort, applied strictly when all existing interpretative methods still leave unresolved ambiguity. This ensures that RoL does not undermine legal predictability while simultaneously upholding fairness in criminal adjudication. The conclusion highlights the necessity of explicitly regulating RoL within Indonesian positive law. Such regulation would provide judges with clearer guidance, reinforce protections for defendants, and contribute to achieving a balanced criminal justice system. Ultimately, the integration of RoL offers a pathway for Indonesia to harmonize its civil law tradition with a principle that enhances justice and prevents potential abuse of prosecutorial and judicial discretion.
Pelaksanaan Rekam Medis Odontogram Pasca Berlakunya Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 tentang Rekam Medis Sukma, Findwicha Kharisma; Zamroni, Mohammad; Lufsiana, Lufsiana
Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai, Riau, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jptam.v9i2.31489

Abstract

Berlakunya Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 tentang Rekam Medis mencabut Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 269 Tahun 2008 yang sebelumnya mengatur kewajiban dokter gigi untuk membuat odontogram rekam medis. Kewajiban dokter gigi untuk mengikuti standar rekam medis kedokteran gigi sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku yang menjadi dasar hukum bagi seorang dokter gigi untuk mendapatkan perlindungan hukum terutama ketika terjadi sengketa medis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan pelaksanaan odontogram dalam rekam medis dan menganalisis perlindungan hukum bagi dokter gigi yang tidak melaksanakan odontogram dalam rekam medis. Metodologi penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan tesis ini adalah yuridis normatif. Pendekatan ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hilangnya pengaturan odontogram dalam Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan tentang rekam medis yang baru saja diundangkan telah menyebabkan kekosongan norma odontogram sebagai dokumen hukum dalam undang-undang dan mengakibatkan hilangnya asas kepastian hukum. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa dokter gigi belum siap menghadapi kebutuhan forensik dan medikolegal. Terkait dengan hukum yang belum jelas, kegiatan penafsiran hukum dapat dilakukan dengan menggunakan teori-teori penafsiran hukum yang harus dilakukan dengan cara atau metode yang berlaku dalam ilmu hukum.
Constitutionality of PERPU Number 2 of 2022 Concerning Job Creation Based on the Ruling of the Constitutional Court Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Negara, Dharma Setiawan; Lufsiana, Lufsiana; Nainggolan, Samuel Dharma Putra
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 13 No. 1 (2023): April
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2023.13.1.159-179

Abstract

Applicability Constitution Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation changes several arrangements previous employment _ arranged in Constitution Number 13 of 2003 Concerning Employment give rise to various polemic in proven implementation _ with he sued Constitution Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation to Court The resulting constitution decision that Constitution the must repair, especially those related with employment. Because of That Government through the President set Regulation Government Replacement Law (PERPU) Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation as an answer to the polemic and emptiness of the law that occurred. Study This is a study law normative with the use approach legislation and approach conceptual study about the constitutionality of PERPU Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation which has been determined by the President Republic of Indonesia. PERPU is made only if a situation is critical. PERPU 2/2022 was created when the Job Creation Law was declared to need to be revised because it was decided by the MK to be in conflict with the Constitution, while the Covid 19 conditions required the state to continue to maintain economic stability, therefore PERPU 2/2022 was issued, however, this PERPU was also challenged by the MK because It is considered that some of the content does not reflect any form of protection for workers. Apart from that, the applicant's argument for a judicial review of PERPU also argued that PERPU 2/2022 was made even though it was not in a critical situation.
REORGANIZATION OF THE TAX COURT WITHIN THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT POST CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NO 26/PUU-XXI/2023 Negara, Dharma Setiawan; Husban, Husban; Putra Nainggolan, Samuel Dharma; Lufsiana, Lufsiana
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v3i2.323

Abstract

Pursuant to Article 24 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia) it is stated that judicial power is exercised by a Supreme Court and judicial bodies under it within the realm of general courts, religious courts, military courts, state administrative courts and by a Constitutional Court. Based on Article 1 number 8 of Law Number 48 of 2009 Concerning Judicial Power (UU 48/2009) there is a special court that has the authority to examine and hear and decide on certain cases which can only be formed within one of the judicial bodies under the Supreme Court. regulated in laws and regulations. The limitation of judicial institutions as stipulated in Article 24 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia does not allow for judicial institutions that are not within the scope of the Supreme Court and/or the Constitutional Court. However, there is a judicial institution, namely the Tax Court as stipulated in Article 2 of Law Number 14 of 2002 concerning the Tax Court (UU 14/2002), which is a judicial body that exercises judicial power for taxpayers seeking justice in tax disputes. Regarding the Tax Court, the guidance is carried out by the Supreme Court and the Ministry of Finance. This makes the tax court not completely independent as a judicial institution in general that carries out a judicial function (there is still interference from the executive branch, namely the ministry of finance), plus that the Supreme Court, in order to be able to fully supervise the tax court both technically and administratively, the tax court should be under the judicial institutions under the Supreme Court. This research is a normative juridical research using statutory and conceptual approaches with the aim of finding an ideal arrangement regarding the institutional structure of the tax court in Indonesia
The Assessing Validity of Prima Facie Evidence in Handling the Exception of Jurisdiction in Civil Cases Negara, Dharma Setiawan; Susilo, Erwin; Darmawan, Didit; Hardyansah, Rommy; Lufsiana, Lufsiana
JURNAL AKTA Vol 13, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v13i1.48280

Abstract

The plea of lack of jurisdiction in civil cases is a procedural objection by the defendant challenging the court's authority to adjudicate. Theoretically, it does not involve substantive proof, as it precedes the case's merits. However, judicial practice often includes preliminary evidence, prompting scrutiny of its validity. This study examines the legal foundations of jurisdiction exceptions in Indonesian civil procedure and assesses the admissibility of preliminary evidence. Employing a normative juridical approach with legislative, case, and conceptual analysis, it reviews regulations like the Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR), Rechtreglement voor de Buitengewesten (RBg), and Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power. Case studies of Interlocutory Decision No. 19/Pdt.Sus-Parpol/2018/PN Cbn and Decision No. 56/Pdt.G/2018/PN Cbn reveal judges accepting preliminary evidence in jurisdiction pleas. Findings indicate that, despite absent explicit rules, this practice aligns with principles of fast, simple, and low-cost justice under Article 2(4) of Law No. 48/2009. To prevent procedural delays, future regulations should restrict evidence to documents, per Positief Wettelijke Bewijstheorie. This research clarifies the legal framework for preliminary evidence in jurisdiction exceptions, enhancing civil justice efficiency in Indonesia.
TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM APOTEKER DALAM PENJUALAN OBAT YANG MENGANDUNG DEXTROMETHORPHAN DI APOTEK Muhammad Far’ie; Mohammad Zamroni; Lufsiana, Lufsiana
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 10 (2026): Maret 2026
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: Dextromethorphan (DMP) merupakan obat bebas terbatas yang memiliki potensi penyalahgunaan tinggi di masyarakat, terutama di kalangan remaja. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan penjualan obat yang mengandung DMP dan mengidentifikasi tanggung jawab hukum apoteker serta apotek dalam penjualan yang melebihi batas edar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan penjualan DMP diatur secara ketat melalui UU Kesehatan, UU Narkotika, dan regulasi BPOM mengenai obat-obat tertentu yang sering disalahgunakan. Tanggung jawab hukum apoteker bersifat individual berdasarkan perbuatan melawan hukum (Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata) dan kelalaian profesional (Pasal 308 UU No. 17/2023). Selain itu, pertanggungjawaban dapat meluas ke korporasi apotek melalui doktrin corporate fault (Pasal 447 UU No. 17/2023 dan PERMA No. 13/2016) jika terjadi kegagalan sistemik dalam pengawasan distribusi obat. Perlunya sinkronisasi sanksi administratif, disiplin, dan pidana menjadi instrumen krusial dalam melindungi kesehatan masyarakat dari penyalahgunaan obat.
Co-Authors Didit Darmawan Husban, Husban Mohammad Zamroni Mohammad Zamroni Muhammad Far’ie Nainggolan, Samuel Dharma Putra Negara, Dharma Setiawan Prima Nerito Rommy Hardyansah Sukma, Findwicha Kharisma Susilo, Erwin Sutarno Sutarno