Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pidana Bagi Pelaku Kejahatan Seksual Anak : Analisis Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022: Criminal Penalties for Child Sexual Crimes: Analysis of Law Number 12 of 2022 Setyo Utomo; Sri Ayu Septinawati; Sy Muhammad Ridho Rizki Maulufi Alkadrie; Weni Sentia Marsalena
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 7 No. 12: Desember 2024 - Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains (JKS)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v7i12.6458

Abstract

Kejahatan seksual terhadap anak merupakan pelanggaran serius terhadap hak asasi manusia yang berdampak panjang pada korban. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual (UU TPKS) hadir untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi anak-anak sebagai kelompok rentan. Artikel ini menganalisis penerapan pidana bagi pelaku kejahatan seksual terhadap anak berdasarkan UU TPKS. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa UU TPKS memberikan sanksi berat bagi pelaku, termasuk pidana tambahan seperti kebiri kimia dan pemasangan alat deteksi elektronik. Kesimpulan menegaskan pentingnya penegakan hukum yang efektif untuk menciptakan efek jera sekaligus melindungi hak anak sebagai generasi penerus bangsa.
Juridical Analysis of the Role of the Prosecutor’s Office in Criminal Law Yohanes Pande; Riadi Asra Rahmad; Yanto Irianto; Rio Akmal Syahban; Sy Muhammad Ridho Rizki Maulufi Alkadrie
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol. 6 No. 3: July 2024 - International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v6i3.5827

Abstract

Basically, the Prosecutor's Office is a state law enforcement tool, protector and protector of society, obliged to maintain the rule of law. The Prosecutor's Office thus acts as a law enforcer. The prosecutor's office is the only state institution which is a government apparatus that has the authority to delegate criminal cases, prosecute perpetrators of criminal acts in court and carry out decisions and decisions of criminal judges. This power is a characteristic of the prosecutor's office that differentiates other law enforcement institutions or bodies. In the criminal justice system, there is a prosecution sub-system carried out by the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. The prosecutor has an important role in the trial and it is the prosecutor who is authorized by law to carry out prosecutions as a public prosecutor who acts on behalf of the State in carrying out his duties and authority. In the realm of criminal law, the prosecutor's office has a very urgent role and also has a role and authority which is confirmed in Article 30C of Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia.
Legal Challenges in Combating Deepfake Abuse: A Comparative Study of AI Regulation in Privacy Protection and Digital Security Muhammad Doing; Yuko Fitrian; Sy Muhammad Ridho Rizki Maulufi Alkadrie; W Warriyodi; Muhammad Reza Fahlevi; A Aprieyanti
Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Deepfake technology is an artificial intelligence (AI)-based technology that is rapidly evolving but also poses risks of identity fraud, misinformation dissemination, and privacy violations. This study analyzes the legal challenges in addressing the misuse of deepfake technology in Indonesia and compares them with international regulations, such as the European Union's GDPR and AI Act. Using a normative and comparative legal approach, this study finds that Indonesia's Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP) and Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) still have weaknesses in addressing deepfake issues, particularly regarding the lack of clear legal definitions, weak law enforcement, and the absence of digital platform liability. As a solution, this study proposes modifications to regulatory theory by adapting the concepts of the right to be forgotten, AI forensics, and intermediary liability to strengthen Indonesia's legal policies.