Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.383
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pengabdian Al-Ikhlas Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Rahmathoni, Lutfi Yusup
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
PERBEDAAN MAKNA RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PASCA PERMA NO.1 TAHUN 2024 PADA SISTEM HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA Rahmathoni, Lutfi Yusup
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 10 (2024): Tema Filsafat Hukum, Politik Hukum dan Etika Profesi Hukum
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v5i10.567

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research discusses the different meanings of Restorative. Justice. in the criminal law system in Indonesia, especially after the issuance of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) no. 1 of 2024. Restorative. Justice. is seen as an alternative solution that can accommodate the interests of all parties in handling criminal cases. and focuses on recovery for all parties involved, but there are discrepancies in its implementation in various legal agencies.This research uses a doctrinal approach with statutory and conceptual analysis. Data was collected through literature studies and analysis of existing policies, including Police Regulations, Prosecutor's Regulations, and Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 1 of 2024. A prescriptive approach is used to provide arguments about the ideal implementation of Restorative Justice.The results of the discussion show that differences in understanding of restorative justice between the police, prosecutors and courts can cause disagreements and conflicts in implementation. Restorative Justice can function as a method of resolving cases or as a philosophical approach in the judicial process. Clear and uniform guidelines are needed to ensure consistency in the implementation of Restorative Justice at all stages of the justice system.This research concludes that to achieve effective and consistent implementation of restorative justice, all legal agencies need to have the same understanding of this concept. With uniform policies and training for law enforcement officers, Restorative Justice can function as an optimal instrument of justice, providing benefits for victims, perpetrators and society as a whole in Indonesia.Keywords: Differences in Meaning, Restorative Justice, Perma No.1 of 2024, Criminal Law System in Indonesia.
Kepastian Hukum dalam Sistem Praperadilan Pidana terhadap Saksi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Rezkia Pasha, Karesya; Munawar, Akhmad; Rahmathoni, Lutfi Yusup
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 7 (2024): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Referring to Article 1, Paragraph 2 of Law No. 31 of 2014 of the Republic of Indonesia, “witness-perpetrator” is suspect, defendant, or convict cooperates in supporting the law enforcement process to uncover a criminal act in the same case. The legal issue regarding the construction of pretrial procedures concerning the designation of “witness-perpetrator” in corruption follows: when a witness false testimony, there are provisions in the under Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) strictly regulated, emphasizing and essential function of reviewing the legality of the process, based on the initial actions arrest and detention, which are considered coercive measures under the law.
PENYULUHAN HUKUM DALAM UPAYA PENCEGAHAN BULLYING DI SMA MUHAMMADIYAH KARANG INTAN KABUPATEN BANJAR Munawar, Akhmad; Rahmathoni, Lutfi Yusup; Sariati, Muhamad Ali; Jannah, Noor; Inayati, Rizkiah; Adhani, Muhammad Fadhan
JURNAL PENGABDIAN AL-IKHLAS UNIVERSITAS ISLAM KALIMANTAN MUHAMMAD ARSYAD AL BANJARY Vol 10, No 3 (2024): AL-IKHLAS JURNAL PENGABDIAN
Publisher : Universitas Islam kalimantan MAB

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/jpaiuniska.v10i3.16829

Abstract

ABSTRAKBullying di kalangan remaja sekolah merupakan masalah serius yang perlu ditangani dengan perhatian dan pendekatan yang tepat. Dalam rangka pemahaman dari aspek hukum pencegahan Bullying dalam guna memberikan pemahaman dalam Upaya meminimalisir dampak negative bullying serta melindungi generasi muda, Penyuluhan hukum tentang pencegahan Bullying dikalangan remaja sekolah di daerah merupakan salah satu solusi terhadap permasalahan yang dihadapi sekarang ini. Melalui kegiatan ini, diharapkan ke depannya dapat meningkatkan pengetahuan, kemampuan dan penguasaan terhadap penyuluhan Hukum Pencegahan Bullying di SMA Muhammadiyah Karang Intan Kabupaten BanjarKata kunci: Penyuluhan Hukum, Bullying, remaja, sekolah
Analisis Hukum terhadap Perlindungan Whistleblower dalam Mendukung Kebebasan Berpendapat di Indonesia Sari, Aina Pramita; Munawar, Akhmad; Rahmathoni, Lutfi Yusup
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 4 No 7 (2023): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v4i7.791

Abstract

Freedom of opinion and protection of whistleblowers are two critical aspects in maintaining transparency and accountability in Indonesia, particularly within the context of a healthy democracy. Article 28E, Paragraph (3), and Article 28F of the 1945 Constitution guarantee the right of every individual to express opinions, access information, and communicate freely. However, the implementation of freedom of opinion often faces obstacles, especially in relation to the ITE Law, which contains multi-interpretive articles, such as Article 27, Paragraph (3), and Article 28, Paragraph (2). These provisions are frequently used to criminalize individuals who express criticism or file public reports. This creates an imbalance between the right to freedom of expression guaranteed by the constitution and the inconsistent application of the law. This article also underscores the importance of legal protection for whistleblowers, who often face both physical and legal threats. While existing legal protections, such as Law No. 13 of 2006 in conjunction with Law No. 31 of 2014 regarding Witness and Victim Protection, provide a legal foundation, their implementation remains limited in the digital context. Therefore, harmonizing regulations, including revising the ITE Law, is essential to ensure that both freedom of expression and whistleblower protection are properly safeguarded. Reform in Indonesia's legal system is urgently needed to create a safe environment for the public to voice their opinions and report violations. This, in turn, will strengthen transparency, prevent corruption, and bolster democracy in Indonesia.
Paradigma Baru Hukum Acara Pidana: Rekonstruksi Perlindungan Hak Asasi Tersangka dalam Proses Peradilan Noor, M. Supian; Munawar, Akhmad; Rahmathoni, Lutfi Yusup
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 12 (2024): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v5i12.821

Abstract

The Indonesian criminal justice system faces significant challenges in balancing legal certainty and the protection of suspects' human rights. Although the presumption of innocence principle is enshrined in various laws and regulations, pretrial detention practices are often misused by law enforcement officials as a psychological pressure tool against suspects. Article 21 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) grants broad discretionary powers to investigators and prosecutors in determining detention, without stringent judicial oversight. This situation creates a high risk of arbitrary criminalization, which contradicts the fair trial principle as stipulated in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). This article analyzes the fundamental weaknesses in the criminal procedural law system, particularly in detention mechanisms and pretrial judicial oversight, and proposes a more just and accountable system reconstruction. KUHAP reform is necessary to establish stricter minimum evidence standards before detention, expand pretrial judges' authority to assess the substance of evidence, and strengthen independent oversight of detention decisions made by law enforcement officials. By implementing these reforms, Indonesia's criminal justice system can become more transparent, accountable, and aligned with internationally recognized human rights protection principles.
Konsep Presidensial Threshold terhadap Demokrasi di Indonesia Rahmathoni, Lutfi Yusup; Herlina, Sri
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 8 (2025): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i8.1791

Abstract

Presidential Threshold in Indonesia’s democratic system focuses on its alignment with the principles of democracy as stipulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The Presidential Threshold is a provision that sets a minimum requirement for nominating presidential and vice-presidential candidates. Although argued to simplify the contest and maintain governmental stability, this policy is considered contrary to democratic principles that uphold freedom, equality, and public representation. This study employs a juridical-normative method with an approach based on democratic theory and statutory regulations. The findings indicate that the implementation of the Presidential Threshold presents a dilemma between forming a strong and stable government and the importance of maintaining openness to diverse political participation. While the policy aims to streamline the electoral system, in practice it may violate democratic principles, particularly regarding the protection of the right to be elected, and contradict the principles of representation, freedom to run for office, and fairness in a pure democracy. Therefore, it is necessary to establish new regulations to balance the goal of political stability with the principle of popular sovereignty.
Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Delik Aduan dalam Penegakan Hukum Hak Cipta berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Rahmathoni, Lutfi Yusup; Herlina, Sri Maharani; Sudiyono, Sudiyono; Rizqi, Ahmad
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 7 (2025): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.1801

Abstract

This study examines the application of complaint offenses in copyright law enforcement under Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. As part of intellectual property rights, copyright provides legal protection for creative works, enabling creators or rights holders to obtain both economic and moral benefits, and preventing violations such as piracy or unauthorized use. Based on Article 120 of the Copyright Law, most copyright violations are classified as complaint offenses, meaning that investigation and prosecution can only proceed if a complaint is filed by the creator, copyright holder, or an authorized party unless the violation harms the public interest, in which case it is treated as an ordinary crime. This study employs a descriptive-analytical approach to primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that the regulation of complaint offenses offers flexibility for rights holders to choose between litigation and non-litigation resolution. However, implementation faces challenges such as proving ownership, lengthy legal processes, and the potential misuse of complaint withdrawals. In conclusion, applying the complaint offense mechanism to copyright law can balance the protection of individual rights with the public interest, but it requires stronger regulations and greater legal awareness to achieve more effective and equitable enforcement.
Penerapan Asas Pembuktian Terbalik dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Perkara Pencucian Uang di Indonesia Herlina, Sri; Rahmathoni, Lutfi Yusup; Sudiyono, Sudiyono; Gayeta, Macario G.
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 7 (2025): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.1805

Abstract

Money laundering is a serious crime that has a major impact on the economic stability and integrity of the country's financial system. This crime is generally associated with predicate offenses, such as corruption, narcotics, and organized crime, to conceal the origin of illicit wealth. In law enforcement, the application of the reverse burden of proof principle is a crucial strategy for overcoming the difficulty of proof. This study examines the application of the reverse burden of proof principle in the Indonesian criminal justice system, particularly in money laundering cases, as outlined in Law Number 8 of 2010. The method used is normative juridical with a conceptual and statutory approach. The results of the study indicate that the application of the reverse burden of proof principle can strengthen efforts to eradicate money laundering, but must still uphold the principle of fair trial and protection of human rights, especially the presumption of innocence. Law Number 8 of 2010 has not comprehensively regulated the standards of proof, verification, and legal impact of this principle, thus creating a vacuum of norms and legal uncertainty. In practice, the accused is only burdened to explain the origin of the wealth, while the prosecutor proves the elements of the crime. However, this shifting burden of proof still raises concerns about violations of the presumption of innocence. Therefore, the application of the reverse burden of proof principle requires more detailed legal regulations and strict supervision so that it is not misused and continues to guarantee legal justice for the accused.
Co-Authors Adhani, Muhammad Fadhan Gayeta, Macario G. Herlina, Sri Maharani Inayati, Rizkiah Munawar, Akhmad Noor Jannah, Noor Noor, M. Supian Rezkia Pasha, Karesya Rizqi, Ahmad Sari, Aina Pramita Sariati, Muhamad Ali Sudiyono Sudiyono