Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Transformasi Kompetensi Guru dengan Inovasi Pembelajaran Berkarakter Berbasis Artificial Intelligence di Madrasah Tsanawiyah Nurul Huda Muaro Jambi Adang Ridwan; Ria Karmila; Sri Hidayati; Harlina Harja; Rian Septiawan
Nusantara: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Februari: NUSANTARA Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/nusantara.v6i1.7677

Abstract

The rapid development of digital technology requires teachers to possess competencies that are relevant to modern learning needs. This necessity underlies the focus of this community service program, namely transforming teacher competencies through character-based learning innovation supported by Artificial Intelligence (AI). The program was conducted at Madrasah Tsanawiyah Nurul Huda Muaro Jambi with the aim of strengthening teachers’ skills in utilizing AI as a tool to support interactive learning while instilling character values in students. The method included socialization, training, and direct mentoring in the practical application of AI-based learning media in the classroom. The results showed significant improvements in teachers’ ability to design technology-based learning materials, a better understanding of integrating character education, and increased motivation to innovate. Furthermore, the program fostered a more engaging learning atmosphere aligned with the needs of the digital generation. Therefore, the transformation of teacher competencies through AI not only enhances teacher professionalism but also plays a crucial role in shaping students with strong character amid technological advancement.
Komparasi Teknik Pengumpulan Data dan Pengembangan Instrumen Penelitian pada Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif:Kajian Sistematis Adang Ridwan; Saputra, Yoga Erdi; Karmila, Ria; Septiawan, Rian
Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Juni:Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/concept.v5i2.2798

Abstract

The selection of appropriate data collection techniques and the development of valid research instruments are fundamental aspects that determine the quality and credibility of educational research. Differences in research paradigms between qualitative and quantitative approaches require distinct strategies for collecting data and designing research instruments. This study aims to compare data collection techniques and research instrument development in qualitative and quantitative research approaches through a systematic review. The study employed a systematic literature review method by analyzing relevant scientific publications, including journal articles, books, and conference proceedings published in the field of educational research. The collected literature was selected, evaluated, and synthesized based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify similarities, differences, strengths, and limitations of each approach. The findings indicate that qualitative research primarily employs interviews, observations, focus group discussions, and document analysis to obtain in-depth contextual data, while its research instruments include interview guides, observation protocols, field notes, and documentation guidelines that are developed flexibly according to research contexts. In contrast, quantitative research predominantly utilizes questionnaires, structured observations, tests, and experiments with standardized instruments that emphasize validity, reliability, and objectivity. The comparison further reveals that qualitative instrument development prioritizes credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability, whereas quantitative instrument development focuses on content validity, construct validity, criterion validity, and reliability testing. This study provides a comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of data collection techniques and research instrument development in both approaches, offering practical guidance for researchers in selecting appropriate methods based on research objectives and designs.
Analisis Data Penelitian Pendidikan: Konsep, Prosedur, dan Implementasi pada Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif Adang Ridwan; Agus Salim; Ria Karmila; Mahdayeni Mahdayeni; Harlina Harja; Rian Septiawan
Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juni : Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mutiara.v4i3.3121

Abstract

Data analysis is a fundamental stage in educational research because it determines the validity, credibility, and quality of research findings. The different philosophical paradigms underlying qualitative and quantitative approaches require distinct concepts, procedures, and analytical techniques. This study aims to examine the concepts, procedures, and implementation of data analysis in educational research using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. A literature review method was employed by analyzing books, scientific journal articles, and other relevant academic references related to educational research methodology. The findings indicate that qualitative data analysis emphasizes an interactive and iterative process involving data reduction, data display, conclusion drawing, and verification to produce credible and meaningful interpretations. In contrast, quantitative data analysis relies on systematic statistical procedures, including descriptive and inferential analyses, to test hypotheses, identify relationships among variables, and support objective decision-making. Although both approaches differ in their analytical orientation and techniques, they share the need for systematic, objective, valid, and rigorous procedures to ensure the accuracy and trustworthiness of research findings. Understanding these differences enables researchers to select analytical methods that are appropriate to their research objectives, designs, and data characteristics. This study contributes to a broader understanding of educational research methodology and provides practical guidance for researchers, educators, and university students in implementing effective and appropriate data analysis techniques.