Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Legal Framework and Challenges Concerning Forensic Evidence in Nigeria Wakili, Saminu Abacha; Obisesan, Olawunmi Opeyemi; Ekpenisi, Collins; Antai, Godswill Owoche; Umo, Maria Edet
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 7, No 1 (2025): February
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v7i1.28599

Abstract

Forensic evidence cannot be avoided in modern legal systems; it is used principally for asserting justice. However, there are several challenges that implementing forensic evidence in the judicial processes faces in Nigeria. Attempts to address this persistent problem include issues such as the admissibility of forensic evidence in courts, lack of adequate forensic infrastructure, inadequate examinations, and a lot more procedural inconsistency. Hence, the need to examine the legal provision regarding forensic evidence in Nigeria, the identification of the main core challenges, and possible reform proposals to improve reliability and acceptance in audit processes. The study adopts a doctrinal study method, relying on primary and secondary sources of research material. The study therefore revealed gross loopholes within the corpus of legislation in Nigeria: highly limited statutory references on emerging forensic technologies, extremely few forensic laboratories, and inconsistencies in judiciary interpretation of forensic evidence. The study has further uncovered a critical blockage to the usage of forensic evidence, which is the lack of specialized training to law enforcement and judiciary officers. The study further concludes that the status of Nigeria as far as the advancement of forensic evidence is concerned is marginally high, but there are lots of things to be done. Legislative amendments are recommended to strengthen forensic vidence laws, investments in forensic infrastructure, and capacity-building initiatives for legal and law enforcement professionals. These measures are sure to strengthen the place of forensic evidence in the advancement of justice in Nigeria.
Constitutional and Legislative Framework for Sustainable Environmental Management in Nigeria: Issues and Challenges Ekpenisi, Collins; Okonji, Charles; Okpoko, Mercy; Hassan Ismaila Adebowale; Aidonojie, Endurance
Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law
Publisher : CV. Pustaka Parawali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71239/jicl.v2i2.69

Abstract

The long-term survival and sustenance of every society are contingent on sustainable environmental management. For a country like Nigeria, with a continuous increase in the rate and intensity of environmental degradation, sustainability practices, laws, and institutions are even more critical. Rapid industrialisation, unchecked oil exploration, and ineffective regulatory enforcement have all contributed to this problem. This seemingly perpetual destruction of the environment ought to be addressed effectively, and specifically by using the country’s legal and institutional frameworks to effect some degree of positive change. However, lapses and gaps in the execution of crucial legislation, combined with gross political negligence and unwillingness to act, have hindered any form of progress. This paper examines Nigeria’s existing legal and institutional frameworks, highlights and evaluates challenges that delimit their effectiveness, and offers some insights into their apparent and expected contributions to environmental sustainability. The paper employs a doctrinal method and relies heavily on primary legislation, judicial authorities, and secondary academic sources, particularly studies from expert legal, socio-political, and environmental scholars. The study concludes with a considerable number of recommendations that suggest important areas of improvement in Nigeria’s broader plan for effective environmental management. This research contributes a comprehensive analysis of Nigeria’s constitutional and legislative frameworks for environmental management, identifying legal gaps and proposing actionable reforms to strengthen sustainable environmental governance.
Legal Issues Concerning Surrogacy in Uganda: Taking a Leap from the United Kingdomd Aidonojie, Paul Atagamen; Aidonojie, Esther Chetachukwu; Eregbuonye, Obieshi; Okpoko, Mercy Osemudiame; Ekpenisi, Collins
Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Vol 8 No 2 (2025): Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/yur.v8i2.23973

Abstract

The practice of surrogacy in Uganda has several legal issues and implications. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the legal issues and implications related to surrogacy in Uganda and make comparisons with the United Kingdom. In this case, the study was conducted using a doctrinal research method, relying on primary and secondary research materials. This study found the following: legislation on surrogacy is still being developed by the Ugandan government, and existing laws do not directly regulate surrogacy, which essentially creates legal loopholes and legal vacuums. In addition, this study found that UK law appears to adequately address issues related to surrogacy. This study concludes and recommends that the Ugandan government needs to accelerate the enactment of legislation on surrogacy to address relevant issues in the future, such as the commodification of women's bodies, parental rights, the best interests of the child, and so on.
LEGAL AND POLICY FORMULATION FOR COMMUNITY POLICING IN CURBING CRIME IN NIGERIA Ekpenisi, Collins; Aidonojie, Paul Atagamen; Okonji, Ifesinachi Charles; Okpoko, Mercy; Eregbuonye, Obieshi
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 27, No 2: August 2025: Islam and Justice development in Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v27i2.45944

Abstract

Given the rise of community policing, crime prevention and control strategies have become similar across different jurisdictions. However, in Nigeria, effective community policing has yet to be realized due to the absence of a comprehensive legal and policy framework. This study examines the legal and policy mechanisms necessary to institutionalize community policing as a tool for reducing crime in Nigeria, comparing them with best practices from other countries and global standards. It addresses key issues such as an ineffective policing system, mistrust between the police and the public, inadequate legal structures, and inconsistent policy directives. The study proposes a structured legal and policy framework to strengthen community policing and enhance public safety. Employing a doctrinal research approach, the study critically analyzes relevant laws, policies, and international best practices, supplemented by empirical data from selected Nigerian communities. It also offers a comparative evaluation of countries with varying levels of community policing success, drawing valuable insights. The research identifies significant gaps in legal partnerships and coordination, as well as diminished community ownership resulting from distrust and lack of transparency. Consequently, establishing a strong legal and policy foundation is crucial for formalizing and operationalizing community policing in Nigeria. The study recommends enacting a comprehensive Community Policing Act, enhancing stakeholder capacity, and fostering civic engagement to build mutual trust and cooperation between law enforcement agencies and local communities.
Legal Implications of the P5 Veto Power on the Enforcement of ICJ Judgments and its Impact on the Credibility of the UN Security Council Aidonojie, Paul Atagamen; Ismiala, Hassan Adebowale; Antai, Godswill Owoche; Ekpenisi, Collins; Obieshi , Eregbuonye
Sinergi International Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/law.v4i1.916

Abstract

The formation of the United Nations and its organs is meant to steer global community affairs. Hence, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), as one of the UN organs, has been positioned to address conflicts between states. Although the enforcement of its judgment depends mainly on the UN Security Council, which has often been constrained by the P5 Veto Power. Hence, this study examines the legal implications and impact of the P5 Veto power in the enforcement of the ICJ Judgement. The study adopts a doctrinal method of study by utilising the PRISMA Guide to systematically search, evaluate and assess primary and secondary sources of research materials. Hence, several international laws and case law were relied on. Also, 48 scientific peer-reviewed secondary sources were relied on. Results indicate that enforcement outcomes are shaped less by legal obligation than by P5 political alignment, producing recurrent compliance deficits. The study therefore concludes that the P5 Veto Power generate significant legal impact and consequences in circumventing the enforcement of the ICJ Judgement. The study recommends amending the UN Charter to limit the power of the P5 in the enforcement of the ICJ Judgement. In the alternative, there should be regional cooperation in recognising and implementing the ICJ Judgement. This research is a breakthrough in the sense that it associates the P5 veto with the systematic obstruction of ICJ judgment enforcement and not with the general UN decision-making. It additionally illustrates the obstruction's impact on the Security Council's credibility in its role as the international justice custodian.
Legal Issues and Challenges in Securing Ugandans' Health Rights in Vaccine Safety Aidonojie, Paul Atagamen; Aidonojie, Esther Chetachukwu; Ismiala, Hassan Adebowale; Jufri, Muwaffiq; Ekpenisi, Collins
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): January 2026
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v4i1.1173

Abstract

Health is widely regarded as a form of wealth and a fundamental human right that governments must protect. In response to global infectious diseases, the international community has increasingly relied on vaccine development as a strategy to mitigate major health threats. However, public concerns such as those raised by Dr. Wahome Ngare’s medical team regarding the safety of certain vaccines highlight the urgent need for strong legal and institutional mechanisms to safeguard public health. Against this backdrop, the study examines Uganda’s legal framework for protecting citizens’ health rights and explores the structural challenges that may hinder the effectiveness of these laws. Using a doctrinal research method, the study draws on primary and secondary legal materials and analyzes them through descriptive and analytical approaches. The findings reveal that unsafe vaccines can pose severe risks to human health. The Ugandan government is legally obligated, under both international and domestic law, to ensure that vaccines circulating within the country are safe and effective. Despite this mandate, several obstacles limit the implementation of health protections, including constitutional barriers to the application of international law, bureaucratic delays in enforcing national regulations, resource constraints, and low public awareness of the health reporting system. The study concludes by reaffirming the need to strengthen the protection of Ugandans’ health rights. It recommends that the government address these challenges by domesticating reliable international legal standards, reducing internal legal bureaucracy, and improving public awareness of health reporting mechanisms. This research contributes to the broader understanding of how Uganda’s legal and institutional structures support public health rights, while identifying gaps, accountability issues, and policy challenges related to vaccine safety and public trust.