Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Awang Long Law Review JURNAL RETENTUM
Noor, Andreyan
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PEMBATASAN MASA JABATAN KETUA UMUM PARTAI POLITIK: PILAR DEMOKRASI DAN PENGUATAN PELEMBAGAAN PARPOL DARI CONFLICT OF INTEREST DAN ABUSE OF POWER Elviandri, Elviandri; Dana, Robin; Kholik, Sadam; Noor, Andreyan
JURNAL RETENTUM Vol 6 No 2 (2024): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Pascasarjana UDA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46930/retentum.v6i2.5030

Abstract

Partai politik merupakan fondasi penting sekaligus pilar utama demokrasi yang sehat dan berkelanjutan, berakar pada transparansi dan akuntabilitas. Tantangan besar muncul dari praktik personalisasi dan oligarki dalam partai yang kekuasaan terpusat pada segelintir elit, khususnya ketua umum yang memegang jabatan tanpa batas waktu. Berbagai forum tertinggi partai, seperti Kongres dan Munas, kerap menjadi formalitas dalam mengukuhkan kepemimpinan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membangun kosntruksi hukum pembatasan masa jabatan ketua umum partai politik. Adapun metode penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual, yang berlandaskan pandangan dan doktrin hukum. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pengalaman beberapa negara, seperti Chile dan Ekuador tentang pembatasan masa jabatan ketua umum dapat mencegah konsentrasi kekuasaan, memperkuat regenerasi, dan mendorong transparansi. Pembatasan masa jabatan ketua umum partai politik bukan sekadar kebutuhan, melainkan keharusan. Regulasi pembatasan masa jabatan ketua umum partai politik menjadi solusi krusial untuk mengatasi permasalahan ini. Tanpa pembatasan ini, partai cenderung menjadi alat kepentingan pribadi, bukan sarana aspirasi rakyat. Implementasi pembatasan akan membuka ruang bagi kaderisasi yang sehat, memungkinkan kader muda potensial berkontribusi, dan menciptakan mekanisme check and balance yang lebih efektif. Reformasi ini menjadi langkah strategis untuk mengembalikan kepercayaan publik terhadap partai politik. Dengan demikian, pembatasan masa jabatan ketua umum bukan sekadar aturan teknis, melainkan langkah fundamental untuk menjaga integritas demokrasi Indonesia.
THE IMPLICATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION REGARDING THE LIMITATION OF REGIONAL HEADS' TERMS ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF REGIONAL HEADS' NOMINATIONS Noor, Andreyan; Yulianingrum, Aullia Vivi; Elviandri, Elviandri; Alhadi, Muhammad Nurcholis
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i1.1419

Abstract

The limitation of regional heads' terms in Indonesia is basically related to two things, the first is to avoid abuse of authority, and the second is to regenerate leadership in the regions, therefore the limitation of the regional heads' terms is very important. This research is normative legal research with a statute approach and a case approach, by analyzing the decisions of the Constitutional Court such as Decision Number 22/PUU-VII/2009, Number 67/PUU-XVIII/2020, and Number 2/PUU-XXI/2023. This study examines how the Constitutional Court interprets the term limits of regional heads, including the calculation of the term of office for regional heads who do not complete their term of office. The results of this study show that the Constitutional Court emphasizes that a term of office that is served for half of the term or more is counted as one full term, both for definitive officials and temporary officials. This interpretation aims to ensure legal certainty and prevent abuse of power, by providing protection for the constitutional rights of citizens who wish to run for re-election. The Constitutional Court's decision also confirms that the norm of term limits for regional heads is in line with the principles of justice, proportionality, and legal certainty guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution. Thus, this term limit is not only served to prevent the dominance of power, but also to encourage the regeneration of healthy leadership in the Indonesian democratic system. The implications of this Constitutional Court decision are very important for the implementation of the 2024 Simultaneous Regional Head Elections, where the KPU and Bawaslu must ensure the consistent implementation of this norm, to ensure the creation of fair, transparent, and quality elections.
THE IMPLICATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION REGARDING THE LIMITATION OF REGIONAL HEADS' TERMS ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF REGIONAL HEADS' NOMINATIONS Noor, Andreyan; Yulianingrum, Aullia Vivi; Elviandri, Elviandri; Alhadi, Muhammad Nurcholis
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i1.1419

Abstract

The limitation of regional heads' terms in Indonesia is basically related to two things, the first is to avoid abuse of authority, and the second is to regenerate leadership in the regions, therefore the limitation of the regional heads' terms is very important. This research is normative legal research with a statute approach and a case approach, by analyzing the decisions of the Constitutional Court such as Decision Number 22/PUU-VII/2009, Number 67/PUU-XVIII/2020, and Number 2/PUU-XXI/2023. This study examines how the Constitutional Court interprets the term limits of regional heads, including the calculation of the term of office for regional heads who do not complete their term of office. The results of this study show that the Constitutional Court emphasizes that a term of office that is served for half of the term or more is counted as one full term, both for definitive officials and temporary officials. This interpretation aims to ensure legal certainty and prevent abuse of power, by providing protection for the constitutional rights of citizens who wish to run for re-election. The Constitutional Court's decision also confirms that the norm of term limits for regional heads is in line with the principles of justice, proportionality, and legal certainty guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution. Thus, this term limit is not only served to prevent the dominance of power, but also to encourage the regeneration of healthy leadership in the Indonesian democratic system. The implications of this Constitutional Court decision are very important for the implementation of the 2024 Simultaneous Regional Head Elections, where the KPU and Bawaslu must ensure the consistent implementation of this norm, to ensure the creation of fair, transparent, and quality elections.
Co-Authors Dana, Robin Elviandri, Elviandri Kholik, Sadam Muhammad Nurcholis Alhadi Yulianingrum, Aullia Vivi