Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains
M. Aslam Fadli
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Oleh Pejabat Publik Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara: Legal Review of Abuse of Authority by Public Officials from the Perspective of State Administrative Law Karolus Charlaes Bego; M. Aslam Fadli; Irman Putra; Arief Fahmi Lubis; Edy Sony
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 7 No. 10: Oktober 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v7i10.6194

Abstract

Penyalahgunaan wewenang tidak hanya melibatkan aspek hukum, tetapi juga etika dan moral dalam menjalankan tugas sebagai pejabat publik. Penyalahgunaan wewenang oleh pejabat publik adalah pelanggaran serius yang harus ditangani dengan tegas. Tindakan ini tidak hanya merugikan masyarakat, tetapi juga mencederai prinsip-prinsip hukum yang mendasari tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik. Penyalahgunaan wewenang dapat didefinisikan sebagai tindakan seorang pejabat publik yang menggunakan kekuasaan yang dimilikinya tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum dan untuk kepentingan pribadi atau pihak tertentu, sehingga merugikan kepentingan publik. Penerapan prinsip-prinsip hukum administrasi negara dan teori yang relevan sangat penting untuk mencegah dan menindaklanjuti tindakan tersebut. Upaya preventif dan penegakan hukum yang efektif sangat diperlukan untuk menjaga integritas pemerintahan dan kepercayaan publik. Penyalahgunaan wewenang oleh pejabat publik dapat berakibat pada sejumlah konsekuensi hukum, yang antara lain tindakan Administratif semisal pemecatan atau pencopotan dari jabatannya, tuntutan secara Pidana, melakukan ganti rugi dan juga pengawasan serta audit, dan juga pemberian sanksi disiplin.
Juridical Analysis of the Court Decision on the Contentious Marriage Validation Petition Case Number: 1817/Pdt.G/2025/PA.JB M. Aslam Fadli
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol. 7 No. 4: October-2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v7i4.8938

Abstract

The background of this study arises from the fact that unregistered marriages (nikah siri) are still prevalent in Indonesia, making marriage validation petitions an important legal instrument to obtain state recognition. However, in this case, a legal issue arose because the petitioner did not involve Mursani’s previous wives, who are still alive and have children that legally may have interests in the heir’s status and inheritance rights. The research questions in this study are as follows: 1) What are the judge’s juridical considerations in rejecting the marriage validation petition? 2) Have the judge’s considerations complied with the provisions of positive law and the substantive justice principles in Islamic law?. This study employs a normative juridical method using a case approach and a statute approach. Data sources are obtained from court decisions, legislation (Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage, the Compilation of Islamic Law, and Supreme Court Regulations related to family cases), as well as Islamic legal doctrines and literature. The analysis results show that the judge rejected the marriage validation petition because the first and second wives were not involved as respondents, even though they legally have potential interests in the outcome of the ruling. This consideration was based on the principle of audi et alteram partem (the right of every party to be heard), which is a fundamental principle of justice. However, substantively, this rejection creates a problem of legal utility, as it leaves the petitioner’s (third wife’s) marital status and her children’s legal standing unprotected, both administratively and civilly—particularly concerning inheritance and lineage rights. This study concludes that the judge’s decision is formally in accordance with the principles of civil procedural law; however, materially, it does not fully reflect the principles of utility and substantive justice for legally vulnerable parties, particularly for children born from unregistered marriages. A more progressive judicial guideline is needed so that judges can balance formal legal certainty with the protection of the civil rights of children and women in contentious marriage validation (isbat nikah) cases.
Legal Analysis of the Implementation of the Execution of the Object of Mortgage Based on Decree Number: 10/PDT.EKS/RL/2024/PN.JKT.BRT JO. Number 265/25/2023 M. Aslam Fadli
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 8 No. 10: Oktober 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v8i10.9043

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the validity of the execution of the object of mortgage based on Decree Number: 10/Pdt.Eks/RL/2024/PN.Jkt.Brt jo. The case was registered under the title of the Building Use Rights Certificate (SHGB) No. 265/25/2023/KPKNL, Area I Jakarta, with two Building Use Rights Certificates (SHGB) No. 11 and 12 in the name of PT Inasa Wahana. The execution was carried out due to the debtor's default, but this gave rise to legal issues because a third party, PT Lunto Richpat, was operating the property under a lease agreement without receiving any notification or warning prior to the execution. Furthermore, a discrepancy was found between the addresses of the property listed in the SHGB and the locations of the executed buildings, namely Jalan Bulak Teko, RT 006 RW 003 and RT 011 RW 003. This research employed a normative juridical method with a case approach and a statute approach. Data were obtained from court rulings, KPKNL auction documents, and legal literature on collateral. The results indicate that the execution did not fully comply with the principles of legal certainty and protection for third parties as stipulated in Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights. Mismatching the execution object and the lack of notification to third parties have the potential to create legal flaws in the execution process and civil liability for the execution applicant. The author recommends that every execution of mortgage rights be conducted with the prudential principle, thorough physical verification of the object, and official notification to interested parties, to ensure fairness and legal certainty for all parties involved.
Co-Authors Arief Fahmi Lubis Edy Sony IRMAN PUTRA Karolus Charlaes Bego