Budiraharjo, Joko
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

The Influence of Work Culture and Motivation on Employee Performance in the Logistics Affairs of the Police Headquarters Planning and Service Administration Sub-Division Budiraharjo, Joko; Madiistriyatno, Harries; Soraya, Fatimah; Jati, Prihatina
International Journal of Economics Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Economics Studies
Publisher : Raudhah Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/rqv0xx64

Abstract

Employee Performance Improvement. 2) To find out and analyze the influence of motivation on improving employee performance. 3) To find out and analyze the Influence of Work Culture and Motivation on Employee Performance in Logistics Affairs, Sub-Section Planning and Administration of Police Headquarters Services. This research approach is quantitative, descriptive and associative. In this study the authors narrowed the population, namely the number of employees of the Logistics Affairs Sub-Division of Planning and Administration of the Police Headquarters Service of 100 employees. The results of this study indicate that: 1) the t-value for the Work Culture variable (X1) is 3.950 while the t-table value for N = 31 is 2.039. So 3.950 > 2.039, then H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted, it can be stated that Work Culture (X1) has a significant effect on Employee Performance (Y). 2) the tcount value for the Motivation variable (X2) is 2,986, while the ttable value for N = 31 is 2,039. So 2,986> 2,039, then H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted, it can be concluded that the motivation variable (X2) partially affects employee performance (Y). 3) ANOVA obtained Fcount value of 14.111 Medium Ftable ( 0.05) for N = 31 of 2.91. So Fcount > from Ftable ( 0.05) or 14.111 > 2.91 with a significant level of 0.000 because 0.000 <0.05, it can be said that Work Culture (X1) and Motivation (X2) together have a positive effect on Employee Performance (Y). Adjusted R Square (R2) value is 0.466. This shows that 46.6% of Work Culture (X1) and Motivation (X2) simultaneously affect Employee Performance (Y) while the remaining 53.4% is influenced by other factors not examined in this study.
THE INFLUENCE OF LEADERSHIP AND WORK ENVIRONMENT ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE AT PT. PERMODALAN NASIONAL MADANI AT MEKAR UNIT IN PEKANBARU BRANCH Dita, Irma; Pratikno, Yuni; Budiraharjo, Joko
Inspirasi Ekonomi : Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Inspirasi Ekonomi : Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen
Publisher : Program Studi Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Timor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32938/ie.v7i1.9326

Abstract

With a simple random sampling technique, a sample of 75 employees was taken at PT. Permodalan Nasional Madani Mekaar Pekanbaru Branch as a respondent in this study. There is an Influence of Leadership on Employee Performance. It is proven that the t-value for the Leadership variable (X1) is 4.526 while the t-table value for n = 75 is 1.992. So 4.526> 1.992, then H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted, it can be stated that Leadership (X1) has a significant effect on Employee Performance (Y). There is an Influence of the Work Environment on Employee Performance. It is proven that the t-value for the Work Environment variable (X2) is 5.980, while the t-table value for n = 75 is 1.992. So 5.980> 1.992, then H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted, it can be concluded that partially the Work Environment variable (X2) has an effect on Employee Performance (Y). There is an influence of Leadership and Work Environment together on Employee Performance. It is proven that the ANOVA test obtained an F-value of 57.759, while the F-table (a 0.05) for n = 75 was 2.73. So Fcount > from Ftable (a 0.05) or 57.759 > 2.73 with a significant level of 0.000 because 0.000 < 0.05, then it can be said that Leadership (X1) and Work Environment (X2) together or simultaneously have a positive effect on Employee Performance (Y). The Adjudted R Square (R2) value is 0.605. This shows that 60.5% of Leadership (X1) and Work Environment (X2) together have an effect on Employee Performance (Y), while the remaining 39.5% is influenced by other factors not examined in this study.
ANALYZING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COMPENSATION, COMPETENCE, AND WORK ENVIRONMENT WITH EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION AT THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION Pitaloka, Anggun; Rangkuti, Zulkifli; Budiraharjo, Joko
Inspirasi Ekonomi : Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Inspirasi Ekonomi : Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen
Publisher : Program Studi Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Timor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32938/ie.v7i2.9755

Abstract

The r test value for the Compensation variable (X1) with rcount is 0.623 and r table for N= 140 is 0.166, significance is 0.000. Because rcount is greater than rtable (0.623 > 0.166 and significance is smaller than 5% (0.000 < 0.050) then Ha is accepted and H0 is rejected, it can be stated that Compensation (X1) is significantly related to Employee Job Satisfaction (Y). The r test value for the Work Competency variable (X2) with an r count of 0.762 and an r table for N= 140 of 0.166 with a significance of 0.000. Because the rcount is greater than r table (0.762 > 0.166 and the significance is smaller than 5% (0.000 < 0.050) then Ha is accepted and H0 is rejected, it can be stated that Compensation (X1) is significantly related to Employee Job Satisfaction (Y), the r test value of the Job Competence variable (X2) with rcount of 0.762 and r table for N= 140 of 0.166 significance of 0.000. Because rcount is greater than rtable (0.762 > 0.166 and the significance is smaller than 5% (0.000 < 0.050) then Ha is accepted and H0 is rejected, it can be stated that Compensation (X1) is significantly related to Employee Job Satisfaction (Y), the ANOVA test value is obtained Fcount is 118,068 while Ftable (a 0.05) for n = 136 is 2.44. So Fcount > from Ftable (a 0.05) or 140,753 > 2.44, with a significance level of 0.000 because 0.000 < 0.05, it can be said that Compensation (X1), Work Competence (X2) and Work Environment (X3) together are related to Employee Job Satisfaction (Y), the correlation coefficient is 0.850 and According to the provisions, these four variables have a positive relationship. This means that the variables Compensation (X1), Work Competence (X2) and Work Environment (X3) have a very strong positive relationship with Employee Job Satisfaction (Y)
Persepsi Karyawan Terhadap Pengaruh Media Sosial dalam Kinerja Pegawai di Rumah BUMN Jakarta Turahmah, Siva Nur’aini Aprillia; Feriandy, Feriandy; Budiraharjo, Joko
EKOMA : Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi Vol. 5 No. 1: November 2025
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/ekoma.v5i1.11280

Abstract

Fokus penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui seberapa meningkatnya penggunaan media sosial dalam mendukung aktivitas kerja, khususnya dalam ranah pelayanan, promosi, dan komunikasi pada Rumah BUMN Jakarta. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif deskriptif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam terhadap dua informan kunci yang merupakan pegawai aktif di Rumah BUMN Jakarta. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa karyawan memiliki persepsi yang sangat positif terhadap penggunaan media sosial. Media sosial dianggap mampu meningkatkan efektivitas dan efisiensi kerja, memperluas jangkauan pelatihan kepada UMKM binaan, serta mempercepat koordinasi internal. Platform yang sering digunakan meliputi Instagram, WhatsApp, dan TikTok. Faktor pendukung keberhasilan penggunaan media sosial meliputi literasi digital, infrastruktur teknologi, dan kebijakan manajerial.