Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ATTRIBUTE-BASED EVALUATION OF DENGUE SURVEILLANCE IN SUMENEP REGENCY: ASSESSING EFFECTIVENESS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT: Evaluasi Surveilans Demam Berdarah Dengue Berbasis Atribut di Kabupaten Sumenep: Menilai Efektivitas dan Rekomendasi Perbaikan Yuliani, Cahya; Hidajah, Atik Choirul; Susilastuti, Fransisca; Suryadinata, Mohammad Agus; Soares, Virgilio
Jurnal Berkala Epidemiologi Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Berkala Epidemiologi (Periodic Epidemiology Journal)
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jbe.V13I32025.201-210

Abstract

Background: Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever remains a significant public health concern in Sumenep Regency, with cases and fatalities reported annually. In 2023, both the incidence rate (27.74/100,000 population) and the case fatality rate (1.96%) exceeded the national targets (IR ≤10; CFR ≤0.6%). Therefore, evaluating the dengue surveillance system is essential to assess its performance and support effective control measures. Purpose: This study evaluates the dengue surveillance system in Sumenep Regency in 2023 based on surveillance system attributes to provide recommendations for improvement. Methods: The study was conducted at a public health center (puskesmas) and the Regency Health Office, involving 17 informants, including surveillance officers and DHF program managers. Data were collected through interviews, document reviews, and observations using questionnaires and sheets. Analysis was based on surveillance system attributes aligned with Indonesia’s DHF prevention and control guidelines, with results presented in tables and narratives. Results: The surveillance system demonstrated good data stability and timeliness, but remains complex, inflexible, has low user acceptance, is not yet representative, and is not yet sensitive. Conclusion: The dengue surveillance system in Sumenep needs improvements in simplicity, user acceptance, representativeness, sensitivity, and data quality. Efforts should simplify processes, integrate active and passive surveillance, standardize procedures, and strengthen coordination to improve system effectiveness.
Analisis Alternatif Prioritas Pemecahan Masalah Pencegahan dan Pengendalian Infeksi di Hospital Nacional Guido Valadares Dili Timor-Leste Soares, Virgilio; Wahyuni, Chatarina Umbul
Media Gizi Kesmas Vol 13 No 2 (2024): MEDIA GIZI KESMAS (DECEMBER 2024)
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mgk.v13i2.2024.595-607

Abstract

Introduction: Infection prevention and control in hospitals is a practical approach based on real evidence to prevent patients, families and visitors as well as health workers from the risk of infection. Purpose: Purpose of this study was to determine alternative priorities for solving infection prevention and control problems at Hospital Nacional Guido Valadares Dili, Timor Leste. Methods: The method used in this research is qualitative research using interviews and focus group discussions involving 3 key informants consisting of the Executive Director, Clinical Director and Director of nursing and midwifery and 16 informants consisting 1 head of the Quality Control department, 13 head of rooms and 2 educators. Data analysis through several stages, namely problem identification, problem prioritization with the non-scoring Delphi, root cause of the problem with the Fishbone diagram and determining alternative priority problem-solving using the Capability, Accessibility, readiness and leverage (CARL) method. Results: The results of the analysis show that the prevention and control of infections that are not running optimally have obstacles from the Human Aspects, Methods, Budget, Material and Machine or tools, based on the results of the analysis of alternative problem-solving priorities using the CARL method from the first and second rank are Conducting training for surveillance personnel, monitoring and evaluating infection prevention and control activities regularly. Conclusion: Based on the analysis of alternative priority problem solving using the CARL Method is to organize training for surveillance personnel, conduct regular monitoring and evaluation of prevention activities. Monitoring and evaluation should be carried out regularly to monitor the implementation of intervention activities and evaluate infection prevention and control activities, surveillance activities so as to ensure targeted achievements.