Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Politik Hukum Penggunaan Sanksi Pidana Penjara Dalam Pperundang-Undangan Di Indonesia M. Ilham Adepio
Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei Vol 23 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jik.v23i2.39838

Abstract

In the enforcement of criminal law in Indonesia, imprisonment is the most dominant punishment imposed by judges to criminal defendants, if referring to the Criminal Code. However, in addition to the Criminal Code, which is the master book of criminal law regulations in Indonesia, there are other regulations governing criminal provisions, namely regulations in the form of laws. The law is a product of the Legislative Body as an institution authorised to hold the power to make laws. Each term of office of the House of Representatives (DPR) always issues products in the form of laws, some of which regulate criminal provisions with elements of penal reform which are part of the policy/politics of criminal law (penal policy). In 2017-2019 there were 20 laws issued by the Legislative Institution. This research discusses the legal politics of the use of imprisonment sanctions in the 2017-2019 legislation. This research is conducted by library research which is descriptive-analytic in nature, namely by describing the contents of the criminal provisions of the 2017-2019 legislation and analysing them. Using a legal political approach with primary data collection methods, namely laws, law books, journals, theses, and other writings. While secondary data from various references that support this research. The results of research on 12 laws that have criminal provisions from 20 laws studied show that imprisonment is the most dominant punishment used in the formulation of criminal threats in each law. The legal politics of the use of imprisonment sanctions in the 2017-2019 legislation when viewed with the 3 main substance of the criminal stelsel shows that based on the type of punishment (strafsoort) the formulation of punishment with the type of ‘Imprisonment and Fines’ is the most widely used formulation. Based on the length and severity of the punishment (strafmaat), it shows that the minimum imprisonment is 3 months and the maximum is 20 years. Regarding fines, it is found that the minimum amount of punishment is Rp. 6,000,000.00 and the maximum amount is Rp. 100,000,000,000.00. Based on the form of criminal punishment (strafmodus), it shows that the form of ‘cumulative punishment’ is the most widely used form of criminal punishment. As for the reasons for the determination of the formulation of punishment in terms of length and severity of punishment, it is not found specifically in the academic paper, except for 1 law that clearly outlines the reasons.
Tantangan Hukum dan Keamanan dalam Mitigasi Sampah Luar Angkasa Tak Teridentifikasi: Ancaman bagi Misi Antariksa dan Keselamatan Astronaut Nurul Adzkia; Rahwa Wati, Linda; Erzavin Daveri; Ema Septaria; M. Ilham Adepio
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): June
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/ijlj.v2i4.3911

Abstract

Unidentified space debris poses a significant threat to the sustainability of space exploration and the safety of astronauts. As the number of artificial objects in Earth's orbit increases, the risk of collisions and damage to operational satellites and spacecraft also grows. This study examines the legal and security challenges in mitigating unidentified space debris using a normative approach, analyzing key international treaties such as the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (Outer Space Treaty 1967), the Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects 1972 (Liability Convention 1972), and the Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space 1967 (Rescue Agreement 1967). While these treaties establish a legal framework for space object responsibility, gaps remain in ownership attribution and enforcement mechanisms, particularly for unidentified debris. Additionally, limited monitoring technology hampers effective collision risk mitigation. To address these challenges, stronger international regulations, the development of more precise tracking technologies, and enhanced global cooperation in space debris removal efforts are essential to maintaining the safety and sustainability of future space missions.
Implementasi RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) Terhadap Indonesia Menurut Hukum Internasional Ano Dwi Wijaya; Dista Aulia; Naurah Qanitah Dzakirah; Ema Septaria; M. Ilham Adepio
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 02 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i02.1330

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis tentang implementasi Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership di indonesia menurut hukum internasional, mengetahui pengaturan RCEP menurut konvensi wina 1969 tentang perjanjian internasional. Dengan menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif dan bersifat preskriptif analitis. Pendekatan yang digunakan menggunakan pendekatan ketentuan konvensi internasional dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa keikutsertaan Indonesia dalam perjanjian Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership berdampak pada ekspor RCEP dapat meningkatkan akses pasar bagi produk-produk Indonesia, mempecepat arus investasi asing langsung, dan memperkuat peran Indonesia dalam rantai pasok global. Namun, di sisi lain, persaingan dengan produk impor yang lebih murah serta ketimpangan daya saing Industri domestik. Peran konvensi wina 1969 memberikan kepastian hukum sebagai acuan untuk memastikan bahwa perjanjian RCEP tersebut sesuai dengan asas pacta sunt servanda dan itikad baik.
Analisis Yuridis Peristiwa Pagar Laut Ditinjau Dari Hukum Nasional Dan Hukum Laut Internasional Dendi Saputra; Deyan Ajian Putra; Indah Salsabilla Putri; Ema Septaria; M. Ilham Adepio
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The sea fence phenomenon at Pantai Indah Kapuk 2 (PIK 2) raises legal issues related to reducing community access and adverse impacts on the environment. This research aims to conduct a further study of legal violations arising from the sea fence incident. This research was conducted by analyzing and systematizing the data and information obtained qualitatively. Data on legal violations due to the sea fence phenomenon were collected using the literature study method. The data collected was analyzed using normative legal methods with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study inform that the phenomenon of sea fencing violates various provisions of Indonesian laws and regulations. Furthermore, the sea fencing phenomenon is also identified as contradicting the principles of sustainable marine resource management and potentially violating the state’s obligation to protect and preserve the environment as per Article 192 of UNCLOS 1982.
Pelanggaran Asas Good Faith terhadap Perjanjian Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Oleh Korea Utara Syarifatul Fadhilah; Amanda Fathona Fadhila; Universitas Bengkulu; Ema Septaria; M. Ilham Adepio
Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Mei : Majelis : Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/majelis.v2i2.634

Abstract

This research examines North Korea's violation of the principle of good faith under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and its legal consequences. The main issue addressed in this study is North Korea’s breach of the good faith principle within the framework of the NPT, which raises legal implications regarding its status and obligations as a party to the treaty. Although North Korea was formally bound by the NPT, it secretly developed a nuclear weapons program, demonstrating non-compliance with the fundamental principle of international treaty implementation. This issue was further exacerbated by its refusal to allow inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and its unilateral withdrawal from the NPT, which has sparked debate over the legitimacy and legality of such action.Using a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes North Korea’s clandestine development of nuclear weapons while still a member of the NPT, as well as the validity of its withdrawal from the treaty. The findings show that North Korea violated the principle of good faith through its secret nuclear program, refusal of IAEA inspections, and withdrawal that did not meet the requirements of Article X of the NPT. The withdrawal may be deemed invalid as it was conducted in bad faith and without fulfilling the treaty's formal provisions. The legal consequences include the continued applicability of obligations under the NPT and state responsibility for breaches of international law. Ideal forms of accountability include the cessation of the nuclear program, payment of reparations, guarantees of non-repetition, and renewed compliance with NPT provisions through verifiable denuclearization.
TRANFORMASI SAMPAH MENJADI ASET: PEMILAHAN SAMPAH ORGANIK-ANORGANIK BERBASIS TABUNGAN EMAS MELALUI SINERGI BANK SAMPAH DAN PEGADAIAN Julia Mayang Sari; M. Ilham Adepio
Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Bangka Belitung Vol 1 No 01 (2025): Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Bangka Belitung
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/ge27ea64

Abstract

Permasalahan pengelolaan sampah masih menjadi isu serius di berbagai daerah, termasuk di Desa Pondok Besi, Kecamatan Teluk Segara, Kota Bengkulu. Rendahnya kesadaran masyarakat dalam memilah sampah serta belum optimalnya sistem pengelolaan sampah menyebabkan terjadinya penumpukan dan pencemaran lingkungan. Melalui kegiatan Kuliah Kerja Nyata (KKN) Tematik tahun 2025, dilakukan program pengabdian bertema “Transformasi Sampah Menjadi Aset: Pemilahan Sampah Organik-Anorganik Berbasis Tabungan Emas Melalui Sinergi Bank Sampah dan Pegadaian.” Program ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kesadaran dan partisipasi masyarakat dalam pengelolaan sampah melalui sistem pemilahan dan pemberian insentif berupa tabungan emas hasil kerja sama antara Bank Sampah dan Pegadaian. Metode pelaksanaan meliputi sosialisasi, pelatihan pemilahan sampah, pendampingan operasional bank sampah, serta penerapan sistem tabungan emas bagi warga yang aktif menyetorkan sampah terpilah. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan terhadap pengetahuan dan perilaku masyarakat dalam memilah sampah, terbentuknya sistem bank sampah yang berkelanjutan, serta munculnya motivasi ekonomi melalui konsep sampah sebagai aset. Sinergi antara masyarakat, pemerintah desa, dan Pegadaian menjadi kunci keberhasilan program ini dalam menciptakan model pengelolaan sampah yang produktif dan bernilai ekonomi.