Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.244
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal FOCUS: Journal of Social Studies IBLAM Law Review Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Humaniorum Journal Journal of Law
Ina Heliany
IBLAM School of Law
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
Ethics and Intellectual Property Rights in Genetic Therapy Raymond R. Tjandrawinata; Ina Heliany; Henry Soelistyo Budi
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 5 (2025): Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Publisher : Pelopor Publikasi Akademika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59888/ajosh.v3i5.500

Abstract

Genetic technology, particularly CRISPR-Cas9, has transformed the paradigm of treating genetic diseases by offering new hope for more effective and precise therapies. However, this advancement also presents significant ethical and intellectual property rights (IPR) challenges. This article explores the impact of patents on the development and accessibility of genetic therapy, as well as the ethical issues arising from human genetic modification, especially at the germline level. Using a qualitative analytical approach that combines literature reviews and case studies, the article examines patent disputes that have emerged in the development of CRISPR and how applied patent policies can exacerbate inequities in access to critically needed medical therapies. Furthermore, the article discusses ethical concerns regarding the misuse of genetic technology and its potential impact on future generations. In conclusion, the article proposes the need for more inclusive and balanced policies that prioritize both innovation and accessibility, as well as strict regulations to ensure the safe and ethical application of genetic technology, while considering broader social and cultural impacts.
Skema dan Mekanisme PPHI dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Charles Daniel Leonard Pardede Pardede; Ina Heliany
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v6i2.684

Abstract

Perkembangan globalisasi dan revolusi industri telah mengubah lanskap ketenagakerjaan, sehingga menuntut sistem penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial yang adaptif dan efektif. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis metode dan skema Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial (PPHI) dalam meningkatkan efektivitas sistem hukum ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif-analitis dengan pendekatan normatif-empiris melalui kajian terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004, telaah literatur ilmiah, serta analisis praktik penyelesaian sengketa melalui mekanisme bipartit, mediasi, konsiliasi, arbitrase, dan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perselisihan hubungan industrial dipengaruhi oleh ketimpangan posisi tawar antara pekerja dan pengusaha, rendahnya kepatuhan terhadap regulasi, serta munculnya model kerja berbasis platform digital. Selain itu, efektivitas mekanisme penyelesaian yang berjenjang masih terkendala oleh lamanya proses, keterbatasan kapasitas aparatur, dan rendahnya literasi hukum. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa integrasi mekanisme non-litigasi, penguatan dialog sosial tripartit, serta pemanfaatan digitalisasi dan teknologi berpotensi meningkatkan efisiensi, transparansi, dan perlindungan hukum ketenagakerjaan.
Perdamaian melalui Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Anak di Indonesia Karen Howard Lalamentik; Ina Heliany
HUMANIORUM Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Humaniorum
Publisher : PT Elaborium Elevasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/hmr.v4i1.140

Abstract

Peace through the restorative justice approach emerged in Indonesian society following public attention to a juvenile criminal case involving the child of a well-known musician couple in a fatal traffic accident in 2013, which resulted in the deaths of seven people, as reflected in Decision No. 123/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim. Based on this background, this study formulates three main issues: the differences in legal processes between the application of restorative justice under PERPOL-RI No. 6 of 2019 and PERJA No. 15 of 2020 and the aforementioned case; the legal consequences experienced by children in conflict with the law in court decisions applying restorative justice-based settlements; and the conditions under which restorative justice can be successfully implemented in handling juvenile crimes within the Indonesian legal system. This research employs a normative juridical method with descriptive non-statistical analysis, utilizing secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that the effectiveness of restorative justice depends on procedural compliance, victim participation, offender accountability, and institutional oversight. Therefore, consistent and selective implementation enables the achievement of substantive peace and holistic justice, although not all types of juvenile crimes can be resolved through this approach due to normative and contextual limitations within Indonesia’s criminal justice practice.
Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia Ipin Tasripin; Ina Heliany
FOCUS Vol 7 No 1 (2026): FOCUS: Jurnal Kajian Sosial
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/fcs.v7i1.2083

Abstract

The criminal act of document forgery is an unlawful act because it can cause harm to others and undermine public trust in the validity of documents. Forgery occurs when someone intentionally creates, modifies, or imitates a document to make it appear as if it is authentic and issued by an authorized party, when in fact it is not. The formulation in this research is how criminal law regulates the crime of document forgery in Indonesia and how the law is applied by judges in sentencing perpetrators of document forgery, as seen in the Subang District Court Decision Number 60/Pid.B/2024/PN Sng. This research is normative legal research, a method that focuses on analyzing legal regulations, legal principles, and prevailing legal doctrines. The researcher uses legal sources such as statutes, regulations, court decisions, and legal literature to understand and interpret existing law. The findings show that in criminal law, every form of involvement in a criminal act entails its own legal responsibility. In the case of document forgery committed by the defendant DP bin alm R, the witness Dedi Priyanto who gave the order should also have been held criminally liable as the person who instructed the crime, in accordance with Article 55 paragraph (1) point 1 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP). This reflects the principle that not only the direct perpetrator, but all parties who play an active role in the crime must be held legally accountable. In Decision Number 60/Pid.B/2024/PN Sng, the Panel of Judges concluded that the elements of Article 263 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code concerning document forgery were proven against Defendant DP bin alm R. The defendant made an invoice containing false information to mislead the company into believing that a debt had been paid off. For his actions, he was sentenced to five months’ imprisonment and remained in detention, with court costs amounting to Rp. 5,000. The decision took into account the principles of legality, legal certainty, and proportionality, as well as considering the defendant’s polite demeanor as a mitigating factor.
Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi terhadap Tindak Pidana Siber: Analisis Yuridis terhadap Perlindungan Subjek Data Pribadi (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pangkalpinang Nomor Putusan Nomor 142/Pid.Sus/2024/Pn Pgp Syafrudin Eko Haryanto Kembang Dada; Ina Heliany
FOCUS Vol 7 No 1 (2026): FOCUS: Jurnal Kajian Sosial
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/fcs.v7i1.2165

Abstract

The development of information technology offers significant benefits but also creates serious risks, particularly concerning security and personal data protection. Cybercrime has therefore become a crucial legal issue, as it may involve not only individuals but also corporations as subjects of criminal law. This study examines: (1) the application of corporate criminal liability in cybercrime under positive law, and (2) whether judicial considerations in Decision Number 142/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Pgp reflect justice and legal protection for personal data subjects. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and case approaches. The findings show that corporations are recognized as criminal law subjects that can be held liable for cybercrimes, including personal data misuse, through sanctions such as fines and other punitive measures. Criminal liability may be imposed based on direct liability, strict liability, or vicarious liability. In the examined case, the court applied the Personal Data Protection Law as lex specialis and imposed imprisonment and fines after considering aggravating and mitigating factors. This decision affirms that both individuals and corporations are subject to criminal liability and highlights the importance of law enforcement in protecting personal data and combating cybercrime.
Putusan Sela Pengadilan Pajak dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Gugatan secara Keseluruhan atas Objek Sita Penagihan Utang Pajak Suhartono Suhartono; Ina Heliany
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v6i1.640

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran putusan sela yang dikeluarkan oleh Pengadilan Pajak dalam menyelesaikan sengketa terkait penyitaan utang pajak. Praktik penyelesaian sengketa sering terhambat oleh belum adanya putusan akhir, sementara otoritas pajak tetap melakukan tindakan penagihan seperti penyitaan aset. Hal ini berisiko menimbulkan kerugian yang tidak dapat dipulihkan bagi wajib pajak, terutama ketika status hukum utang pajak masih dipertanyakan. Putusan sela berfungsi sebagai instrumen hukum sementara yang penting untuk melindungi hak wajib pajak dan menjamin keadilan prosedural. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, dan putusan-putusan Pengadilan Pajak yang relevan. Fokus utama kajian adalah pada kedudukan hukum dan efektivitas putusan sela dalam memberikan perlindungan sementara selama proses penyelesaian sengketa. Analisis mengacu pada Undang-Undang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan (UU KUP) dan Undang-Undang Pengadilan Pajak, yang meskipun tidak mengatur putusan sela secara eksplisit, memberikan ruang bagi diskresi yudisial untuk menegakkan keadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan sela memiliki peran strategis dalam menyeimbangkan kepentingan negara dan hak wajib pajak, terutama dalam kasus penyitaan aset. Penguatan norma prosedural terkait putusan sela diperlukan untuk meningkatkan kepastian hukum dan keadilan dalam penyelesaian sengketa perpajakan.
Analisis Yuridis Praktik Penghindaran Pajak Korporasi dalam Perspektif Good Corporate Governance Berdasarkan Undang-Undang 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan Mohamad Haniv; Ina Heliany; Arrum Budi Leksono
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v6i1.678

Abstract

Pajak merupakan salah satu sumber utama penerimaan negara yang memiliki peranan penting dalam mendukung pembiayaan pembangunan nasional. Dalam praktiknya, korporasi sering melakukan berbagai strategi untuk meminimalkan beban pajak, salah satunya melalui praktik penghindaran pajak (tax avoidance). Praktik ini pada dasarnya memanfaatkan celah dalam peraturan perpajakan yang berlaku sehingga tidak selalu secara langsung melanggar hukum, namun berpotensi mengurangi penerimaan negara. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pengaturan hukum yang lebih komprehensif serta penerapan prinsip Good Corporate Governance guna mendorong kepatuhan perpajakan korporasi.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis praktik penghindaran pajak oleh korporasi dalam perspektif hukum serta mengkaji penerapan prinsip Good Corporate Governance dalam mencegah praktik tersebut berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Bahan hukum yang digunakan terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang dianalisis secara kualitatif.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penguatan regulasi perpajakan melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 merupakan langkah penting dalam menutup celah praktik penghindaran pajak oleh korporasi. Selain itu, penerapan prinsip Good Corporate Governance yang meliputi transparansi, akuntabilitas, responsibilitas, independensi, dan kewajaran memiliki peran strategis dalam meningkatkan kepatuhan perpajakan korporasi. Dengan demikian, sinergi antara pengaturan hukum perpajakan dan penerapan prinsip Good Corporate Governance diharapkan mampu menciptakan sistem perpajakan yang adil, transparan, dan berkelanjutan.
Kesenjangan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus Korban Kekerasan: Kajian terhadap UU Perlindungan Anak dan UU Penyandang Disabilitas Eka Wahyuningrum; Ina Heliany
Postulat Vol 4 No 2 (2026): POSTULAT: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v4i2.2238

Abstract

This study examines regulatory disharmony in the legal protection of children with special needs who are victims of violence in Indonesia and proposes policy reinforcement to ensure effective and non-discriminatory protection. The analysis focuses on inconsistencies between Law Number 35 of 2014 on Child Protection and Law Number 8 of 2016 on Persons with Disabilities, particularly within the criminal justice system. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, this research is strengthened by a sociological perspective emphasizing the role of family and community. The findings indicate that although both laws recognize the rights of children with disabilities, the absence of operational provisions on reasonable accommodation, access to justice, and binding obligations for law enforcement results in protection that remains formalistic and insufficient in practice. This study argues that regulatory harmonization must move beyond declarative norms toward measurable and enforceable mechanisms integrating child protection principles, disability-inclusive access to justice, and procedural safeguards. The novelty of this research lies in its interdisciplinary approach, combining legal analysis with family and community sociology to develop a comprehensive legal protection system for children with special needs who are victims of violence.
Co-Authors Arrum Budi Leksono Charles Daniel Leonard Pardede Pardede Eka Wahyuningrum Henry Soelistyo Budi Ipin Tasripin Karen Howard Lalamentik Mohamad Haniv Raymond R. Tjandrawinata Suhartono Suhartono Syafrudin Eko Haryanto Kembang Dada