Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Arabic as a Source of Foreign Legal Reference: Its Relevance and Challenges in Legal Education in Indonesia Ahmadi Ahmadi; Sri Warjiyati; Arief Budiono; Jamal Hi Arsad; Sultan Alwan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.7083

Abstract

Arabic is one of the primary source languages for various international legal documents, bilateral treaties, and the legal systems of countries with Sharia-based or mixed legal frameworks. This article explores the relevance of Arabic language proficiency as a component of foreign legal literacy within legal education in Indonesia. Using a qualitative approach through literature review and curriculum analysis, the study finds that mastery of Arabic significantly enhances the comprehension of foreign legal texts, including international agreements, commercial laws, and transnational civil law. Nonetheless, several challenges persist, such as the lack of standardized teaching materials, inconsistencies in legal terminology, and the limited number of qualified instructors capable of integrating language and legal studies effectively. This study recommends the incorporation of legal Arabic into law school curricula, particularly in areas focusing on international law, comparative law, and legal translation
Legal Policy Model of National Strategic Projects and Social Stratification from the Welfare Society Perspective Marita Fatimah; Absori; Kelik Wardiono; Arief Budiono; Jamal Hi Arsad; Sultan Alwan
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i3.5498

Abstract

(1) Statement of the Problem: Infrastructure development through the National Strategic Project is one of the government's main policies in accelerating economic growth and improving national connectivity. However, its implementation often results in social impacts in the form of agrarian conflicts, unequal distribution of development benefits, and changes in the social structure of affected communities. This study analyzes the legal policy model of the National Strategic Project and its impact on social stratification from a welfare society perspective using Dahrendorf's social conflict theory approach. (2) Research questions: The research problems are: (a) How is the legal policy model of the National Strategic Project in the legal system of development in Indonesia, (b) How is the impact of the implementation of the National Strategic Project on the social stratification of society and (c) How is the legal policy model of the National Strategic Project based on welfare society in the perspective of Dahrendorf's social conflict theory? (3) Method: This study uses an empirical juridical method with legislative, conceptual, and sociological approaches. Data were obtained through literature studies and empirical data from various research reports, policy documents, and relevant field studies. (4) Findings/Results: The results show that the implementation of the National Strategic Project tends to result in social dualism between groups that benefit from development and affected community groups who experience social marginalization. This condition strengthens social stratification and triggers conflict between dominant and subordinate groups as explained in Dahrendorf's social conflict theory. Therefore, it is necessary to reconstruct the legal policy model of the National Strategic Project based on welfare society by strengthening community participation, fair distribution of development benefits, and legal protection for affected communities. (5) Academic Contribution: This paper gives academic contribution as this policy model is expected to be able to create inclusive and socially just development.
Legal Considerations from Judges in Supreme Court Decree No. 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013 Concerning the Acquittal of Exhibitionism Perpetrators and Their Implications as a Jurisprudence Sultan Alwan; Jamal Hi Arsad; Rusdin Alauddin; Faisal Faisal; Fatma Laha; Amirudin Umasangaji
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1401

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This paper aims to provide a juridical analysis and the implications of the Supreme Court Decision Number 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013, where an exhibitionist perpetrator was declared to have a mental illness and he could not be held responsible. Methodology: This research used a normative juridical method with a library research approach. It was a descriptive study, which aimed to provide insight into the implication of judges in Supreme Court Decree No. 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013 for the case exhibitionism as a jurisprudence.  Results: Based on the results of the Supreme Court Decision, the judge was wrong in placing exhibitionism as an excuse for eliminating criminal liability. This was based on theories and opinions which say that exhibitionism is not included in the provisions as a reason for eliminating criminal liability because exhibitionism is a type of disorder that is different from the disorders contained in the provisions regarding reasons for criminal elimination, i.e., Article 44 of the Criminal Code concerning the ability to be responsible. Exhibitionism is a sexual disorder, as opposed to a type of psychiatric disorder or psychosis contained in Article 44 of the Criminal Code. The judge also failed to base his decision on an examination by a psychiatrist who has the expertise to accurately determine the perpetrator’s mental condition. Applications of this study: This paper can be applied to prevent future occurrences of similar cases, where exhibitionists are not held accountable for their actions. This may bring more harm than good because exhibitionists will feel they have the freedom to disturb public peace by carrying out exhibitionism. Novelty/Originality of this study: No previous researchers have studied this decision and its implications. Keywords: legal consideration; supreme court; exhibitionism; implications; jurisprudence.   ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memberikan analisis yuridis dan implikasi dari Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013, dimana seorang pelaku eksibisionis dinyatakan sakit jiwa dan tidak dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban.  Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan penelitian kepustakaan. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif, yang bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman tentang implikasi hakim dalam Keputusan Mahkamah Agung No. 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013 terhadap kasus eksibisionisme sebagai yurisprudensi.  Hasil: Berdasarkan hasil Putusan MA, hakim salah menempatkan eksibisionisme sebagai dalih penghapusan pertanggungjawaban pidana. Hal ini didasarkan pada teori dan pendapat yang mengatakan bahwa eksibisionisme tidak termasuk dalam ketentuan sebagai alasan penghapusan pertanggungjawaban pidana karena eksibisionisme merupakan jenis gangguan yang berbeda dengan gangguan yang terdapat dalam ketentuan mengenai alasan penghapusan pidana yaitu Pasal 44 KUHP tentang kesanggupan untuk bertanggung jawab. Eksibisionisme adalah gangguan seksual, berbeda dengan jenis gangguan kejiwaan atau psikosis yang terdapat dalam Pasal 44 KUHP. Hakim juga tidak mendasarkan putusannya pada pemeriksaan psikiater yang memiliki keahlian untuk menentukan secara akurat kondisi kejiwaan pelaku.  Aplikasi penelitian ini : Artikel ini dapat diterapkan untuk mencegah kejadian serupa di masa mendatang, di mana eksibisionis tidak bertanggung jawab atas tindakan mereka. Hal ini mungkin membawa lebih banyak kerugian karena eksibisionis akan merasa memiliki kebebasan untuk mengganggu ketentraman masyarakat dengan melakukan eksibisionisme  Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Tidak ada peneliti sebelumnya yang mempelajari keputusan ini dan implikasinya.  Kata kunci: pertimbangan hukum; Mahkamah Agung; eksibisionisme; implikasi; yurisprudensi