Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.983
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Islamadina : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam FOKUS: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan SYARI'AH : Jurnal Ekonomi Syari'ah Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Jurnal Media Ekonomi Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba
Ahmad Danu Syaputra, Ahmad Danu
IAIN Curup
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Dari Keyakinan Menuju Penyelidikan: Membaca Bunga Bank melalui Pragmatisme Charles Sanders Peirce: From Belief to Inquiry: Interpreting Bank Interest through the Pragmatism of Charles Sanders Peirce Ahmad Danu Syaputra
Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Agama Islam, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Differences in scholarly opinions regarding the legal status of bank interest remain a significant issue in Islamic economic law. This debate concerns not only legal rulings but also the differences in reasoning and interpretative approaches adopted by Islamic scholars. This study aims to examine the formation and divergence of legal arguments concerning bank interest through the epistemological perspective of Charles Sanders Peirce’s pragmatism. Employing a qualitative library-based research method, this study adopts a philosophical-conceptual approach and descriptive-comparative analysis. The sources include Peirce’s works, Islamic legal literature, religious fatwas, and relevant scholarly publications. The findings indicate that differing views on bank interest can be understood through four key concepts in Peirce’s philosophy: belief, doubt, inquiry, and meaning. Belief explains the formation of legal convictions, doubt reflects questions arising from the application of the prohibition of riba, inquiry represents the examination of legal arguments through scriptural evidence and reasoning, while meaning clarifies the practical implications of different interpretations. These findings suggest that debates over the legal status of bank interest reflect not only divergent legal conclusions but also distinct processes through which legal knowledge is formed and evaluated. This study contributes an epistemological framework for understanding differences in legal reasoning within Islamic economic law without replacing the established sources and methods of Islamic legal interpretation.  
Co-Authors Ahmad Saifudin, Ahmad Ana Toni Roby Candra Yudha Andi Triyanto Arifin, Rahman Dheo Rimbano Hendra Harmi Hinawati, Titik Irwan Faturhman Lukman Hakim Misnen Ardiansyah, Misnen Muharir, Muharir Sa'adah, Nurus Samawi, Mohammad Wirmon Siswahyudianto