Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Exploration of the Validity of the Moral Competency Inventory Instrument: Analysis of Validation Methods from Various Studies Nurcahya, Fikri; Riyadi, Riyadi; Ridwan, Achmad
Jurnal Evaluasi dan Pembelajaran Vol 7 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : STKIP Al Islam Tunas Bangsa dan HEPI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52647/jep.v7i1.236

This study explores the validity of the Moral Competency Inventory (MCI) as a moral intelligence measurement instrument applied across cultural contexts. Based on a literature review of several studies, this study highlights the strengths, variations, and gaps in the validity of the MCI. The findings indicate that in general, the MCI has good validity in terms of internal structure and content, with four main dimensions of integrity, responsibility, compassion, and forgiveness being relatively stable across cultures. However, the adaptation of the MCI in different cultural contexts results in variations in the response process and the influence of demographic factors, such as age, gender, and cultural background. In addition, several studies show inconsistencies in the convergent and discriminant validity of the MCI, especially in relation to local instruments measuring morality. These gaps indicate the need for further research on the social impact of the use of the MCI across cultures. This study recommends cultural and linguistic adjustments in the future development of the MCI to improve the validity of this instrument as a universal moral intelligence measurement tool.

Pengembangan Instrumen Moral Competency Inventory Berbasis Dimensi Moral Pancasila Nurcahya, Fikri; Soeharno, Soeharno; Tjalla, Awaluddin; Wahyuni, Lussy Dwiutami; KM, Yakob
Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2025
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52738/pjk.v5i1.752

This study aims to develop and validate the reliability of the Moral Competency Inventory based on Moral Dimensions of Pancasila to support the Pancasila Ideology Development Training Program. A total of 356 respondents were involved in this study, selected through convenience sampling from the Pancasila Ideology Development Training Program target group. The study employed 32 statement items designed and validated by eight Subject Matter Experts. Content validation results showed all items had Content Validity Ratio ≥ 0.75 with a Content Validity Index of 0.9. Construct validity was tested using Exploratory Factor Analysis, resulting in four main factors with 24 valid items explaining 55.721% of total variance. Reliability, calculated using Cronbach’s Alpha, produced a value of 0.939, reflecting very high internal consistency. These findings confirm that the instrument is valid and reliable for measuring Pancasila-based moral competencies across various contexts, particularly for the implementation of the Pancasila Ideology Development Training program.

Evaluation of the Accreditation Program for Pancasila Ideology Development Training Organizers with an ApproachAssessment Evaluability and Performance Monitoring (AEPM) Nurcahya, Fikri; Badrujaman, Aip; Priyanto, Sugeng; Madani, Faisal
JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol 9, No 4 (2025): JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) (November)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jisip.v9i4.9102

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the accreditation program for Pancasila Ideology Education and Training (Diklat PIP) providers conducted by BPIP. The evaluation employs the AEPM model, which analyzes four key dimensions: Context, Input, Activity, and Performance Monitoring. Data were collected from 46 respondents representing accredited institutions through a closed-ended Likert-scale questionnaire. Descriptive analysis shows that the Context and Input dimensions received the highest scores, indicating strengths in program planning and institutional readiness. Conversely, the Performance Monitoring dimension obtained the lowest score, highlighting weaknesses in the sustainability of implementation and post-accreditation follow-up. Spearman correlation analysis reveals significant positive relationships among the dimensions, with the highest correlation observed between Context and Input (r = 0.795). These findings suggest that program success largely depends on the integration of design, implementation, and monitoring aspects. The study concludes that although the accreditation has progressed well in administrative terms, the substantive transformation toward sustainable implementation of Diklat PIP still requires further reinforcement. It recommends reform in post-accreditation monitoring and future research using a mixed-method approach to enrich program evaluation holistically.

Exploration of the Validity of the Moral Competency Inventory Instrument: Analysis of Validation Methods from Various Studies Nurcahya, Fikri; Riyadi, Riyadi; Ridwan, Achmad
Jurnal Evaluasi dan Pembelajaran Vol 7 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : STKIP Al Islam Tunas Bangsa dan HEPI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52647/jep.v7i1.236

This study explores the validity of the Moral Competency Inventory (MCI) as a moral intelligence measurement instrument applied across cultural contexts. Based on a literature review of several studies, this study highlights the strengths, variations, and gaps in the validity of the MCI. The findings indicate that in general, the MCI has good validity in terms of internal structure and content, with four main dimensions of integrity, responsibility, compassion, and forgiveness being relatively stable across cultures. However, the adaptation of the MCI in different cultural contexts results in variations in the response process and the influence of demographic factors, such as age, gender, and cultural background. In addition, several studies show inconsistencies in the convergent and discriminant validity of the MCI, especially in relation to local instruments measuring morality. These gaps indicate the need for further research on the social impact of the use of the MCI across cultures. This study recommends cultural and linguistic adjustments in the future development of the MCI to improve the validity of this instrument as a universal moral intelligence measurement tool.

PERAN LEMBAGA UJIAN DALAM PEMBELAJARAN DAN PENGAKUAN KUALIFIKASI: STUDI KOMPARATIF CISCE DAN GAOKAO/NEEA Arianda, Yoga Dwi; Nurcahya, Fikri; Ridwan, Achmad; Madani, Faisal; Suseno, Muchlas
Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 16 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jurnal_ap.v16i2.5656

Assessment systems across countries often face challenges in balancing the functions of selection and learning. Examinations often focus on measuring learning outcomes without considering the accompanying pedagogical and social impacts. This study aims to critically analyze and compare the assessment systems implemented by the Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations (CISCE) in India and the National Education Examinations Authority (NEEA)/Gaokao. This study uses a qualitative, comparative document analysis design to provide an in-depth understanding of the characteristics, principles, and implications of both institutions' assessment systems. The research subjects consisted of 32 official documents. Data were collected through documentation studies and in-depth interviews. The instrument was a validity analysis sheet containing four main components: content relevance, indicator clarity, source consistency, and theoretical relevance. Data analysis was conducted descriptively and analytically using thematic categorization techniques based on four main dimensions: assessment instrument development, system validity and reliability, impact on learning, and institutional credential recognition. The results show that the CISCE excels in curriculum flexibility, integration of formative assessment, and recognition of international credentials. In contrast, the Gaokao excels in mass selection efficiency and national standard consistency. This study concludes that an effective assessment system must balance selection and student potential development to avoid excessive academic pressure. The implications of this research emphasize the importance of developing a national assessment system that is equitable, relevant, and oriented toward lifelong learning

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 5 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search