Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Jurnal Evaluasi dan Pembelajaran Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Indonesia
Nurcahya, Fikri
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Exploration of the Validity of the Moral Competency Inventory Instrument: Analysis of Validation Methods from Various Studies Nurcahya, Fikri; Riyadi, Riyadi; Ridwan, Achmad
Jurnal Evaluasi dan Pembelajaran Vol 7 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : STKIP Al Islam Tunas Bangsa dan HEPI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52647/jep.v7i1.236

Abstract

This study explores the validity of the Moral Competency Inventory (MCI) as a moral intelligence measurement instrument applied across cultural contexts. Based on a literature review of several studies, this study highlights the strengths, variations, and gaps in the validity of the MCI. The findings indicate that in general, the MCI has good validity in terms of internal structure and content, with four main dimensions of integrity, responsibility, compassion, and forgiveness being relatively stable across cultures. However, the adaptation of the MCI in different cultural contexts results in variations in the response process and the influence of demographic factors, such as age, gender, and cultural background. In addition, several studies show inconsistencies in the convergent and discriminant validity of the MCI, especially in relation to local instruments measuring morality. These gaps indicate the need for further research on the social impact of the use of the MCI across cultures. This study recommends cultural and linguistic adjustments in the future development of the MCI to improve the validity of this instrument as a universal moral intelligence measurement tool.
Evaluation of the Accreditation Program for Pancasila Ideology Development Training Organizers with an ApproachAssessment Evaluability and Performance Monitoring (AEPM) Nurcahya, Fikri; Badrujaman, Aip; Priyanto, Sugeng; Madani, Faisal
JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol 9, No 4 (2025): JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) (November)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jisip.v9i4.9102

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the accreditation program for Pancasila Ideology Education and Training (Diklat PIP) providers conducted by BPIP. The evaluation employs the AEPM model, which analyzes four key dimensions: Context, Input, Activity, and Performance Monitoring. Data were collected from 46 respondents representing accredited institutions through a closed-ended Likert-scale questionnaire. Descriptive analysis shows that the Context and Input dimensions received the highest scores, indicating strengths in program planning and institutional readiness. Conversely, the Performance Monitoring dimension obtained the lowest score, highlighting weaknesses in the sustainability of implementation and post-accreditation follow-up. Spearman correlation analysis reveals significant positive relationships among the dimensions, with the highest correlation observed between Context and Input (r = 0.795). These findings suggest that program success largely depends on the integration of design, implementation, and monitoring aspects. The study concludes that although the accreditation has progressed well in administrative terms, the substantive transformation toward sustainable implementation of Diklat PIP still requires further reinforcement. It recommends reform in post-accreditation monitoring and future research using a mixed-method approach to enrich program evaluation holistically.
Exploration of the Validity of the Moral Competency Inventory Instrument: Analysis of Validation Methods from Various Studies Nurcahya, Fikri; Riyadi, Riyadi; Ridwan, Achmad
Jurnal Evaluasi dan Pembelajaran Vol 7 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : STKIP Al Islam Tunas Bangsa dan HEPI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52647/jep.v7i1.236

Abstract

This study explores the validity of the Moral Competency Inventory (MCI) as a moral intelligence measurement instrument applied across cultural contexts. Based on a literature review of several studies, this study highlights the strengths, variations, and gaps in the validity of the MCI. The findings indicate that in general, the MCI has good validity in terms of internal structure and content, with four main dimensions of integrity, responsibility, compassion, and forgiveness being relatively stable across cultures. However, the adaptation of the MCI in different cultural contexts results in variations in the response process and the influence of demographic factors, such as age, gender, and cultural background. In addition, several studies show inconsistencies in the convergent and discriminant validity of the MCI, especially in relation to local instruments measuring morality. These gaps indicate the need for further research on the social impact of the use of the MCI across cultures. This study recommends cultural and linguistic adjustments in the future development of the MCI to improve the validity of this instrument as a universal moral intelligence measurement tool.
PERAN LEMBAGA UJIAN DALAM PEMBELAJARAN DAN PENGAKUAN KUALIFIKASI: STUDI KOMPARATIF CISCE DAN GAOKAO/NEEA Arianda, Yoga Dwi; Nurcahya, Fikri; Ridwan, Achmad; Madani, Faisal; Suseno, Muchlas
Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 16 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jurnal_ap.v16i2.5656

Abstract

Assessment systems across countries often face challenges in balancing the functions of selection and learning. Examinations often focus on measuring learning outcomes without considering the accompanying pedagogical and social impacts. This study aims to critically analyze and compare the assessment systems implemented by the Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations (CISCE) in India and the National Education Examinations Authority (NEEA)/Gaokao. This study uses a qualitative, comparative document analysis design to provide an in-depth understanding of the characteristics, principles, and implications of both institutions' assessment systems. The research subjects consisted of 32 official documents. Data were collected through documentation studies and in-depth interviews. The instrument was a validity analysis sheet containing four main components: content relevance, indicator clarity, source consistency, and theoretical relevance. Data analysis was conducted descriptively and analytically using thematic categorization techniques based on four main dimensions: assessment instrument development, system validity and reliability, impact on learning, and institutional credential recognition. The results show that the CISCE excels in curriculum flexibility, integration of formative assessment, and recognition of international credentials. In contrast, the Gaokao excels in mass selection efficiency and national standard consistency. This study concludes that an effective assessment system must balance selection and student potential development to avoid excessive academic pressure. The implications of this research emphasize the importance of developing a national assessment system that is equitable, relevant, and oriented toward lifelong learning
Co-Authors Achmad Ridwan, Achmad Aip Badrujaman Arianda, Yoga Dwi FAISAL MADANI Muchlas Suseno Nurwijayanti Sugeng Priyanto, Sugeng