Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Legal Protection for People with Mental Disorders Who Are Victims of Sexual Violence Through the Social Services Agency in Sorong City Oriza Sativa Ningrum Ombaer; Wahab Aznul Hidaya; Sokhib Naim
Journal of Law Justice (JLJ) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law Justice (Inpress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/jlj.v4i3.5319

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of legal protections for people with mental disorders (ODGJ) who are victims of sexual violence in Sorong City and to identify institutional and coordination barriers to the fulfillment of victims’ rights, as well as their support, rehabilitation, and recovery. The method used in this study is empirical legal research with a socio-legal approach. Primary data were obtained through interviews with the Sorong City Social Services Agency and relevant parties, while secondary data were obtained from relevant laws and regulations and legal literature. The analysis was conducted qualitatively by comparing the normative framework for victim protection with the actual implementation of protection measures at the local level. The novelty of this study lies in its analysis of protection for people with mental health conditions who are victims of sexual violence through the lens of institutional integration, positioning the Social Services Agency as part of a protection ecosystem that must be connected to the police, the DP3A, health services, professionals, support organizations, families, and the community. The results of the study indicate that, normatively, legal protection for people with mental health conditions who are victims of sexual violence has an adequate legal basis; however, its implementation in Sorong City has not been optimal and remains unintegrated. The Social Services Agency has provided support, social worker interventions, family and community guidance, needs assessments, and service referrals; however, it does not yet have a specific program for people with mental health conditions who are victims of sexual violence. Other barriers include limited mental health and rehabilitation facilities, a shortage of professionals, a lack of social rehabilitation centers, as well as persistent stigma and weak family support. The study concludes that it is necessary to strengthen the integrated protection model and cross-sectoral coordination from the identification of victims, through support, legal proceedings, health and psychological services, rehabilitation, to social reintegration.
Analysis of the Effectiveness of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as an Out-of-Court Solution Arief Ashari Amir; Hadi Tuasikal; Sokhib Naim
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 3 (2026): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i3.5831

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the effectiveness of the role of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as an out-of-court dispute resolution solution, identify obstacles in its implementation, and assess the alignment between normative regulations and their practical application within the Indonesian legal system. This study's method is a normative legal study with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Data were obtained through a literature study of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, and then analysed qualitatively prescriptively. The novelty of this research is focused on the development of ADR studies that not only discuss conventional mediation but also integrate the concept of online dispute resolution (ODR) as a form of ADR digitalisation, linked to the principles of restorative justice and its relevance in resolving customary land disputes in the region. The results of the study show that ADR has higher effectiveness compared to litigation in terms of time efficiency, cost, flexibility, and the ability to produce win-win solutions. However, the implementation of ADR still faces obstacles such as the low legal awareness of the community, the limited number of professional mediators and arbitrators, and the suboptimal execution of the agreement outcomes. The conclusion of this research is that ADR is an effective, fast, inexpensive, and substantively just dispute resolution mechanism. However, to optimise its role in the Indonesian legal system, it is necessary to strengthen regulations, improve the quality of human resources, and develop institutions and digitalisation through ODR so that access to justice can be broader and more responsive to the needs of society.