Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

UPAYA MENCARI KEBENARAN MATERIIL DALAM HUKUM ACARA PERDATA Lubis, Fauziah; Sinambela, Naura Fitri Zaskia; Syahputri, Ardita; Meha, Mellisa; Syahputri, Tri; Lubis, Fahrul Ramadhan
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v5i2.621

Abstract

This study aims to examine the application of the principle of material truth in civil procedural law in Indonesia and compare it with the concept of formal truth that has been dominant so far. The problems raised in this study are: how is the application of the principle of material truth in civil procedural law in Indonesia, and what is the difference between material truth and formal truth in civil procedural law. The background of this study is based on the fact that the Indonesian civil procedural law system, which historically adheres to an adversarial system and emphasizes formal truth, in practice allows judges to actively explore substantive truth in order to achieve justice. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach. Data obtained from primary and secondary legal materials were analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of the study show that although Indonesian civil procedural law emphasizes formal evidence, in practice there is a tendency to apply the principle of material truth, especially in cases concerning the public interest or inequality between the parties. Thus, the principle of material truth has important relevance in realizing substantive justice in resolving civil disputes.
Implikasi Pengaturan Tata Hukum di Indonesia terhadap Supremasi Hukum Siregar, Barly Harly; Azis, Muhammad; Hidayah, Hafidz Muhammad; Kholis, Muhammad; Fadillah, Rifai; Hidayah, Khairul; Pamungkas, Putra; Putri, Deby Octafiani; Ritonga, Almiftahul Jannah; Syahputri, Ardita; Qomariah, Bunga Nur; Lubis, Fahrul Ramadhan
As-Syirkah: Islamic Economic & Financial Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): As-Syirkah: Islamic Economic & Financial JournalĀ 
Publisher : Ikatan Da'i Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56672/y96s7f38

Abstract

The rule of law in the current era of democratization is one of the demands that must be implemented in the context of transparency in the handling of legal cases in social, national and state life. Impeachment is the process of dismissing the President and/or Vice President during their term of office which involves three state institutions, namely the DPR, the Court. The Constitution, and the MPR where the results of impeachment carried out by one of these three institutions have a legal relationship and influence each other. The Constitutional Court's decision provides a juridical interpretation of the DPR's accusations regarding violations of the law and disgraceful acts committed by the president and/or vice president and/or it is proven that the president and/or vice president no longer fulfills the requirements to be president and/or vice president.