Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Implikasi Kepailitan terhadap Keberlakuan Lisensi Merek dan Kedudukan Hukum Penerima Lisensi Menurut Undang-Undang Kepailitan Shevanna Putri Cantiqa; Ema Nurkhaerani
Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Aktivisme : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aktivisme.v2i2.917

Abstract

Bankruptcy as a debt settlement mechanism in Indonesia has a significant impact on all debtors' assets, including intellectual property rights such as trademarks. In practice, many companies have licensed trademarks to third parties before being declared bankrupt, resulting in legal uncertainty regarding the validity of the license agreement and protection for the licensee. This study aims to examine the implications of bankruptcy on the validity of trademark licenses and analyze the legal position of licensees according to the Bankruptcy Law. The research method used is normative juridical with statutory and conceptual approaches, as well as qualitative analysis of primary and secondary legal materials. The results show that the rights to the licensed trademark remain part of the bankruptcy estate and are under the management of the curator. The license agreement can be continued if it benefits the bankruptcy estate, but can be terminated by the curator if it is considered burdensome. The legal position of the licensee is highly dependent on the recording of the agreement at the DJKI and the policy of the curator. The implications of this research emphasize the need for clearer regulations to provide legal certainty and balanced protection for all parties involved in bankruptcy.
Memanusiakan Hak Asasi Manusia: Ethnic Profiling & Counter Terrorism di Palestina Elkristi Ferdinan Manuel; Dita Rosalia Arini; Ahmad Iqbal; Prameswara Winriadirahman; Faqih Zuhdi Rahman; Wendy Budiati Rakhmi; Ema Nurkhaerani; Dwi Najah Tsirwiyati; Slamet Tri Wahyudi; Irsyaf Marsal
JURPIKAT (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Politeknik Piksi Ganesha Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37339/jurpikat.v6i2.2400

Abstract

Tujuan dari kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini adalah untuk memberikan pandangan non-populer terhadap genosida yang terjadi di Palestina, serta memberikan sudut pandang berbeda dalam melihat permasalahan tersebut, yaitu menggunakan pendekatan Hak Asasi Manusia. Permasalahan dalam konflik tersebut adalah masyarakat masih memandang konflik Palestina dengan subjektifitas dan keberpihakan. Kegiatan ini menggunakan metode sosialisasi terbuka dan diskusi interaktif yang diikuti oleh 20 peserta dari masyarakat seni dan kedokteran di T-Space Bintaro. Kesimpulan dari pengabdian untuk para peserta adalah pentingnya menganalisa kasus internasional, menggunakan sudut pandang kemanusiaan dan universalisme dalam konsep Hak Asasi Manusia serta menggeser paradigma tersebut menjadi keberpihakan terhadap kehidupan dan keberlangsungan umat manusia
Keterbatasan Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Pailit Indonesia dalam Perkara Kepailitan Lintas Negara Elirica Aliyah Irwan Bauw; Ema Nurkhaerani
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v2i3.966

Abstract

This study examines the issue of cross-border insolvency in the context of Indonesian bankruptcy law, particularly the limitations of national law in handling cases involving foreign elements such as assets or creditors outside Indonesia. Although Law Number 37 of 2004 contains universal principles, its implementation is hindered by Indonesia's adherence to the principle of territoriality and the absence of international agreements on mutual recognition and enforcement of foreign bankruptcy decisions. This normative legal research employs statutory and conceptual approaches to analyze the legal framework and principles relevant to cross-border insolvency. The findings show that Indonesian bankruptcy rulings currently have limited extraterritorial effect and cannot be directly enforced abroad without proper international legal instruments. To overcome these limitations, the adoption of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency is deemed necessary, along with efforts to establish bilateral or multilateral agreements. Such steps are expected to enhance legal certainty, protect creditors’ rights, and improve Indonesia’s insolvency regime in the context of global commerce.
Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Atas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Berupa Penyatuan Harta dalam Kepailitan Perseroan Tabitha Fransisca Romauli Nababan; Ema Nurkhaerani
Desentralisasi : Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, dan Pemerintahan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Agustus : Desentralisasi : Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, dan Pemerintahan
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/desentralisasi.v2i3.761

Abstract

This study discusses the liability of directors for unlawful acts in the form of merging personal assets with corporate assets in the context of bankruptcy of limited liability companies. Although the principle of separation of assets protects the personal assets of directors, there are conditions in which this principle can be revealed through the principle of piercing the corporate veil. The merging of personal assets by directors, which causes losses or bankruptcy of the company, can be held accountable. The Limited Liability Company Law and the Civil Code emphasize that if proven to have committed unlawful acts or negligence in carrying out their duties, directors can be sued in civil court and their assets confiscated as part of the bankruptcy estate. This study applies a normative legal approach and a literature study method to analyze legal norms and the liability of directors for losses due to bankruptcy. The aim is to provide an understanding of the legal liability mechanism for directors who abuse their authority in managing corporate assets. By applying the principle of justice, directors can be held personally responsible for the protection of creditors and fair law enforcement.
Penentuan Keadaan Insolvensi terhadap Proses Kepailitan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Shelomita Putri Amelia; Ema Nurkhaerani
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Juli : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v2i3.683

Abstract

Bankruptcy regulations in Indonesia, particularly in Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, are often contentious due to the absence of strict limitations on the filing of bankruptcy petitions. This has the potential to ensnare debtors who are still financially solvent, overriding the principle that bankruptcy should be the last resort in debt settlement. Law Number 37 Year 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations only requires the existence of two creditors with debts that are due and collectible through simple proof. This study aims to analyze in depth the legal arrangements and determination of insolvency in Law Number 37 of 2004. By using a normative juridical research method, as well as a statute approach that focuses on Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations and other related regulations, secondary data will be collected through literature studies. Insolvency is defined as a condition where the debtor's total debt to all creditors exceeds the value of all its assets, otherwise known as a state of inability to pay. In Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, the term "insolvency" differs from commonly used terms, such as balance sheet insolvency, which means debts exceeding assets, or cash flow insolvency, which means the inability to pay debts due to liquidity. Unlike the practice in the common law system, the determination of insolvency in Indonesia does not involve mandatory financial audits or court decisions based on independent financial analysis.