Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Riau Law Journal
Tike Murti Sari Dewi
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Eksistensi Pengadilan Perikanan dalam Mengadili Perkara Tindak Pidana Perikanan di Indonesia Irwandi Syahputra; Endri; Eki Darmawan; Heni Widiyani; Tike Murti Sari Dewi; Sebastian Alboen Sihombing
Riau Law Journal Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/rlj.8.2.192-223

Abstract

As long as a fisheries court other than the fisheries court has not been established, criminal cases in the fisheries sector that occur outside the jurisdiction of the fisheries court will still be examined, tried and decided by the competent district court. Such provisions create a dualism in the legal regime, namely the legal regime of the district court and the regime fisheries court law. With the examination of criminal acts in the fisheries sector carried out by the fisheries courts and district courts, there is dualism and legal uncertainty in the handling of fisheries crimes. Several formal laws are specifically regulated in the Fisheries Law, namely the existence of Ad Hoc Judges, Trials without the Presence of the Defendant (In Absentia), Periods of Court Decisions, Determinations and Detention Periods by Judges and Registrars. Fisheries Courts that have been established have made a major contribution in law enforcement, all established fisheries courts have issued several decisions on fisheries cases. The implementation of administrative sanctions in the implementation of the Job Creation Law also affects the existence of fisheries courts in adjudicating fisheries criminal cases. For fisheries crimes committed in the ZEEI region by foreign vessels, the criminal sanctions contained in the Fisheries Law are still applie
Analogi Hukum Harta Bersama Perkawinan Islam Dengan Konsep Ekonomi Islam (Syirkah) Mumaddun Khaerudin Salami; Meriza Elpha Darnia; Tike Murti Sari Dewi
Riau Law Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): Riau Law Journal
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/rlj.9.1.58-72

Abstract

Marriage is one of the rights of every person; the right to marry is protected by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, article 28B paragraph 1. Meanwhile, marriage according to Islamic law is a commandment of Allah and the sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad. The marriage contract in marriage aims to unite two people in a sacred bond that has the value of worship. However, even though it is bound by the marriage contract, it does not immediately unite the assets of both parties, assets obtained before marriages remain the personal property of each party. Meanwhile, regarding assets obtained during marriage or joint assets as explained in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage. Islam does not recognize the concept of joint assets, and then the concept of joint assets was formulated by the government and scholars in Indonesia as written in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) allowing the implementation of joint assets by equating the legal issues with the concept of "syirkah" which was previously only known in Islamic economics. The purpose of this writing is to understand and analyze how the concept of "syirkah" can be used in cases of joint assets in Islamic marriages. The method used in this study is a descriptive normative method. The normative approach is legal research that uses secondary data sources, while the descriptive approach is a research method that attempts to describe and interpret conditions according to what they are.
Pertanggungjawaban Masyarakat Penerima Manfaat Kerugian Negara Dampak Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Tike Murti Sari Dewi; Tengku Mega Rahmadini; Mumaddun Khaerudin Salami; Tengku Arif Hidayat
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/jih.14.2.1-17

Abstract

Pertanggungjawaban pidana merupakan pilar utama dalam hukum pidana yang memastikan bahwa hanya mereka yang memiliki kesalahan dapat dijatuhi pidana. Dalam perkara korupsi, diskursus pertanggungjawaban pidana biasanya difokuskan pada pelaku langsung atau pihak yang turut serta melakukan tindak pidana. Namun, Putusan Pengadilan Tipikor dalam perkara Jabiat Sagala menampilkan perspektif berbeda dengan menyatakan bahwa masyarakat penerima manfaat dari kerugian negara turut bertanggung jawab. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pertimbangan hukum tersebut dari perspektif asas dan doktrin hukum pidana. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan mengacu pada doktrin hukum pidana, asas geen straf zonder schuld, serta literatur hukum yang relevan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pandangan hakim tersebut menimbulkan implikasi penting terhadap perluasan subjek pertanggungjawaban pidana, namun juga mengandung risiko pelanggaran asas legalitas jika tidak dibatasi secara tegas. Artikel ini menawarkan evaluasi kritis terhadap kemungkinan penerapan konsep ini di masa depan, sekaligus memberikan rekomendasi agar prinsip- prinsip dasar hukum pidana tetap terjaga.
Co-Authors Darnia, Meriza Elpha Eki Darmawan Endri Heni Widiyani Irwandi Syahputra, Irwandi Mumaddun Khaerudin Salami Sebastian Alboen Sihombing Tengku Arif Hidayat Tengku Mega Rahmadini