Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Artificial Intelligence dalam Etika Penulisan Karya Ilmiah di Kalangan Mahasiswa Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo Utari, Prahastiwi; Anggreni, Likha Sari; Alkhajar, Eka Nada Shofa; Tanti Hermawati; Yudiningrum, Firdastin Ruthnia; Surwati, Chatarina Heny Dwi; Pramana
PASAI : Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): June
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Mitra Mandiri Aceh(YPMMA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58477/pasai.v3i1.155

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) studies how to make computers do the same or even better than humans. In the academic world, the convenience created by AI can only be separated from negative impacts if its use is balanced with an understanding of its users. Potential ethical violations in writing scientific papers lurk if AI is not understood with clear boundaries. Plagiarism, data validity, and personal data security are potential ethical violations among students when using AI in writing work. Responding to the existing concerns, the Research Group Media, Audiences and Socio-Cultural Systems of the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Sebelas Maret University held a workshop entitled Building Scientific Awareness: Artificial Intelligence in the Ethics of Writing Work among Communication Science Students at Muhammadiyah Ponorogo University. Targeting students who will enter the stage of writing their final project in the form of a thesis, Muhammadiyah Ponorogo University was chosen because it is a developing private campus that needs to be encouraged to achieve superior quality. In the workshop, students showed enthusiasm in following every material presented by the speakers. A survey conducted at the end of the session showed that students' understanding and experience could provide clear boundaries regarding the ethics of scientific writing in the era of AI technolog.
Crisis, voice, reputation: organisational communication and university response to sexual violence cases Setianingrum, Vinda Maya; Pramana
Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Communications Science, Dr. Soetomo University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25139/jsk.v10i1.11360

Abstract

This study examined how organisational communication constitutes crisis response, voice, and legitimacy in university sexual violence cases in Indonesia, a socio-political context shaped by strong cultural hierarchies, legal–bureaucratic governance and an ongoing transition from a culture of silence towards digitally mediated transparency. Drawing on a qualitative multiple-case study of Universitas Indonesia (UI), Universitas Riau (UNRI), and Universitas Andalas (UNAND), the study integrates the Communicative Constitution of Organisations (CCO) perspective with Rhetorical Arena Theory (RAT) to move beyond what universities formally stated towards how organisational reality, authority, and moral legitimacy were communicatively produced during crises. The findings indicate distinct communicative patterns across cases. Dialogic engagement was associated with the preservation of legitimacy, reactive communication facilitated short-term reputational repair, whereas bureaucratic shielding—manifested through reliance on procedural language, regulatory formalism, and strategic silence—intensified public scrutiny and moral contestation. Within the Indonesian digital public sphere, viral social media discourse functioned as a secondary constitutional force, capable of overriding formal organisational texts and compelling institutional responses. More importantly, the study demonstrates that control-oriented crisis communication strategies frequently backfired, as attempts to manage or conceal crisis narratives amplified counter-narratives and weakened institutional moral authority. This reinforces the long-standing insight that the cover-up may be more damaging than the crisis itself. The study contributes to organisational and crisis communication scholarship by challenging assumptions of centralised control and reputational management. It shows that, in morally charged crises such as sexual violence, legitimacy in Indonesian universities is grounded less in image maintenance and more in moral authority enacted through communicative openness, accountability, and dialogic engagement.