Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Knowledge Management: Faculty Perspectives from the University of Zawia’s Faculties of Economics, Management, and Law Husayn, Enaas; Alrumayh, Safa; Kasheem, Majdy; Ibrahim, DafaAllah; Alouzi, Khuloud; Shalghoum, Najimudin; Almajri, Sumaia
Journal of Education and Teacher Training Innovation Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Education and Teacher Training Innovation (JETTI)
Publisher : PT. Pusmedia Group Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61227/jetti.v3i1.163

Abstract

The rapid technological advancements in the educational management enforce institutions to adopt new innovative approaches in knowledge management in ways that support innovation, decision-making, and institutional development. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool with significant potential to enhance knowledge management (KM) practices. However, in many developing contexts, including Libya, the integration of AI in higher education remains limited and underexplored. This study investigates the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on knowledge management (KM) within academic institutions, focusing on faculty awareness, utilization, perceived benefits, and encountered challenges.  The researchers, using a structured questionnaire distributed to 210 academic staff members from faculty of Economy, Management and Law, employed a quantitative research design.  This study reveals critical challenges to AI adoption in Libyan institution, including insufficient infrastructure, resistance to change, and a lack of technical expertise among faculty. Compared with previous studies conducted in technologically advanced contexts, this research contributes novel insights by examining AI in relation to KM integration in a developing academic environment as a gap in the literature. The findings reveal that a generally low level of AI awareness among participants, with limited understanding of core AI concepts and its future implications for higher education. However, moderate use of AI was reported in specific KM functions such as archiving and institutional support.  The study concludes that while AI integration in academic knowledge systems is in its early stages, there exists a clear recognition of its value. Limitations of the study include its focus on one institution, which is the University of Zawia, Libya, and its reliance on self-reported data. Future research should consider longitudinal studies, cross-institutional comparisons, and qualitative investigations to deepen understanding of AI's evolving role in academic institutions. Recommendations include targeted faculty training, infrastructural investments, strategic policy development, and the promotion of a culture acceptance of new to technologies.
EFL University Lecturers’ Perceptions of AI and Critical Thinking: Opportunities, Boundaries, and Assessment Dilemmas Alouzi, Khuloud; Ibrahim, DafaAllah; Omran, Sara; Aladi, Salem; Ahmed, Ahmed Hamid
Journal of English Development Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Journal of English Development
Publisher : Prodi Tadris Bahasa Inggris

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25217/jed.v6i1.7376

Abstract

This study explored EFL university lecturers’ perceptions of generative AI in relation to critical thinking, focusing on perceived opportunities, acceptable-use boundaries, and assessment dilemmas at the University of Zawia, Libya. A mixed-methods descriptive design was used, combining a questionnaire (N = 70) and semi-structured interviews (n = 10). Survey results showed moderate endorsement of AI opportunities for supporting critical thinking (M = 3.93, SD = 1.08), especially for language and comprehension support (M = 4.23, SD = 0.97) and higher-order question generation (M = 4.03, SD = 1.05). However, lecturers strongly emphasized boundaries for acceptable AI use (M = 4.42, SD = 0.89), particularly the need for an institutional policy (M = 4.60, SD = 0.73) and disclosure of AI use (M = 4.49, SD = 0.86). Assessment dilemmas were high (M = 4.17, SD = 0.98), with strongest concern about plagiarism/patchwriting risks (M = 4.40, SD = 0.84) and difficulty judging students’ own critical thinking (M = 4.24, SD = 0.97). Interview findings reinforced a “benefit–boundary tension,” highlighting preference for assessment redesign (in-class writing, oral defense, and process portfolios) over detection-based policing. The study recommends regulated-use guidance, staff training, and student integrity support.
Exploring Students’ Perceptions of Literary Translation through ChatGPT: A Case Study at the Faculty of Languages and Translation, University of Zawia, Libya Abdullah, Mahmoud; Alouzi, Khuloud; Ibrahim, DafaAllah; Masuwd, Mowafg; Albshkar, Hajer
International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning Vol. 4 No. 1 March 2026: International Journal of Post Axial
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study investigates students’ experiences and attitudes towards the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in literary translation at the Faculty of Languages and Translation, University of Zawia, Libya. Sixty undergraduate students from English departments participated in a classroom-based experiment in which they translated literary texts using ChatGPT. Following the translation tasks, students completed a structured questionnaire designed to assess the usability, accuracy, and pedagogical value of AI-assisted translation. Descriptive analysis of the data revealed that while students found AI-tools effective for increasing translation speed and acquiring new vocabulary, they also expressed reservations about the tools’ limitations in handling literary devices such as tone, metaphor, and cultural context. A majority of students are in favor of continued use of AI-tools under instructor guidance, recognizing their value as supplementary learning aids rather than replacements for human translators. The study highlights the need for critical integration of AI into translation pedagogy and encourages further research on balancing automation with interpretive and creative human input.