Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Nusantara Hasana Journal J-CEKI
Fransiscus Nanga Roka
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Penerapan Patriotisme Dalam Perspektif Hukum (Studi Kasus Pada Sanggar Tari Puspa Dewi Surabaya) Tomy Michael; Syofyan Hadi; Wiwik Afifah; Fransiscus Nanga Roka; Muhamad Khoirul Ma'arif; Anam Iman Aulia; Zidniy Ma Naviah; Alienda Maulidiantie
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 4: Juni 2025
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v4i4.9295

Abstract

Dalam konteks ilmu hukum, sesuatu yang tidak diketahui harus ditelusuri secara normatif. Dalam tulisan ini berfokus menyelesaikan permasalahan akan makna patriotisme dalam Sanggar Tari Puspa Dewi Surabaya karena dalam praktiknya para penari anak hanya melakukan tarian secara global namun kurang mengetahui makna kebudayaan dalam ilmu hukum. Frasa “kurang mengetahui” yaitu peningkatan akan korelasi tarian dengan ilmu hukum. Metode yang digunakan adalah menggunakan penelitian empiris dengan pengumpulan data berupa wawancara, pelatihan dan pengolahan data lebih lanjut. Penyelesaian masalah pertama yaitu dengan mengadakan permainan ular tangga patriotisme dimana adanya permainan yang menggunakan daftar pertanyaan seputar pemahaman patriotisme. Kesimpulan yang dapat diambil bahwa penari anak pada Sanggar Tari Puspa Dewi Surabaya merupakan bagian tidak terpisahkan sebagai subjek hukum yang menjunjung tinggi patriotisme dalam tari.
SCIENCE ON TRIAL: INDONESIA’S LEGAL DILEMMA Fransiscus Nanga Roka; Yovita Arie Mangesti
Nusantara Hasana Journal Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): Nusantara Hasana Journal, October 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Nusantara Hasana Berdikari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59003/nhj.v5i5.1727

Abstract

This research analyzed the way in which Indonesia’s anti corruption court combines judicial formalism with scientific proof requirements. Employing a normative and comparative research design, we utilized a doctrinal analysis of Criminal Procedure Code and Anti Corruption Law, micro comparisons to the United States, UK, Singapore, and Indonesia including reliability tests; gatekeeping authority; chain of custody; expert independence. It found systemic epistemic deficits: the lack of an autonomous category for scientific evidence, weak to non existent reliability tests, fragmented chain of custody trade practices, judicial aversion to method and error rate scrutiny and an epistemic imbalance privileging prosecution access to experts and raw materials. Comparative mapping produced a hybrid gatekeeping model which integrates ex ante admission screening and ex post weight attribution, firmly based on validity of method, known error rates, transparent methodology, expert accreditation by the courts, court designated expertise appointment and data disclosure sanctions. We can only trust that rule making of the reliability standard, judicial gatekeeping and ensuring defendants’ rights are necessary in order to ensure due process and legal certainty. These structural changes bring evidentiary practice into closer conformity with scientific rationality, thereby mitigating the risks posed by wrongful convictions and enhancing public confidence in corruption adjudication
JUDICIAL DEFIANCE UNMASKED: SEMA 3/2023 vs MK 34/2013 Fransiscus Nanga Roka; Yovita Arie Mangesti; Erny Herlin Setyorini
Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Yayasan Azam Kemajuan Rantau Anak Bengkalis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to explore whether SEMA NO. 3/2023 indeed functions as a legal constitutional dialogue or an administrative constitutional defiance against binding MK Decision NO. 34/2013. The research problem is twofold, drawn doctrinal: is the reintroduction of PK limitation through SEMA an administrable implementation doctrinally applicable, or it reverses the similar administrative reversibility of constitutional content determined by the Court? Conceptual disambiguation is performed based on a normative juridical method, combined with a doctrinal comparative method. Systematic document study with constitutional text extraction and hierarchical norm-testing are instrumentalized in determining whether the problem is interpretive disagreement or bureaucratic contravention. The results of the research paper found that SEMA3/2023 does not operate as hermeneutic interpretation but as operational bureaucratic command in MK jurisprudence bypassance, and consequently produces constitutional consequence without constitutional adjudication. The key-findings of the research procure found that the normative effect of SEMA 3/2023 doctrinally functions as an administrative constitutional reversal since it reopens the legal path that the Constitution Court has already closed. Comparative analysis with Germany, Italy, and Singapore indicates that civil-law jurisdictions in their design structurally bar administrative constitutional re-constitution of established constitutional meaning. The research thus concludes that SEMA 3/2023 is not a judicial dialogue but an administrative constitutional sabotage in the dual apex configuration formalism of Indonesia.
Co-Authors Alienda Maulidiantie Anam Iman Aulia Erny Herlin Setyorini Muhamad Khoirul Ma'arif Syofyan hadi Tomy Michael wiwik afifah Yovita Arie Mangesti Zidniy Ma Naviah