Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)
Hayatuddin, Raihan Ramadhan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Podcast Mahfud MD Official dan Total Politik Terhadap Dinamika Politik dan Hukum Simanjuntak, Max Doan; Ibran, Jevon Alama; Ladjar, Lidwina Tuto; Baransano, Jeremia; Dori, Evan; Mulya, Ilham Indra; Lazarus, Lazarus; Hayatuddin, Raihan Ramadhan; Hidayat, Muhammad Rahmadzani; Putra, Gilang
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15553312

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran kanal YouTube Mahfud MD Official dan Total Politik dalam mempengaruhi dinamika politik dan hukum di Indonesia. Dalam konteks transformasi media digital, kedua channel ini berfungsi sebagai ruang publik baru yang memungkinkan dialog politik dan hukum berlangsung secara lebih terbuka, reflektif, dan partisipatif. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif dengan analisis isi terhadap episode-episode terpilih yang membahas isu-isu konstitusional, praktik kekuasaan, serta partisipasi politik masyarakat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Mahfud MD Official cenderung bersifat edukatif, normatif, dan berbasis pengalaman institusional narasumber utamanya, sementara Total Politik lebih populis dan dialogis dalam mengangkat isu-isu politik kontemporer. Keduanya berkontribusi dalam membentuk persepsi publik terhadap supremasi hukum, etika kekuasaan, hingga ketegangan antar elite politik. Selain itu, kanal-kanal ini juga mendorong peningkatan literasi politik dan kesadaran hukum masyarakat melalui narasi yang bersifat informatif, kritis, dan inklusif. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa media digital seperti podcast memiliki potensi besar dalam memperkuat demokrasi deliberatif di Indonesia.
Analisis Yuridis Keabsahan Peralihan Hak Atas Surat Berharga (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 5/PDT.G/2018/PN SLT) Gibran, Rizal Ananda; Avatar, Muhammad Raja; Hayatuddin, Raihan Ramadhan; Hendarwin, Rasendriya
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research examines the validity of rights transfer over negotiable instruments based on the District Court Decision Number 5/Pdt.G/2018/PN Slt. The issue arose when a land certificate registered under the heir was transferred to another heir without mutual consent. The study aims to explain legal provisions regarding the transfer of negotiable rights and analyze judicial considerations in resolving the dispute. The research used a normative juridical method by reviewing legal documents. The findings revealed that the transfer was legally defective due to the absence of approval from all rightful heirs. The court ordered the reversion of ownership and declared the previous transfer legally invalid. The conclusion highlights that the validity of rights transfer must follow legal procedures and fairness principles
Debt Collector Ethics in Comparative Perspective Toward Balancing Creditor Interests and Consumer Protection: (Case Study of Kotamobagu District Court Decision Number 97/Pdt.G.S/2022/PN Ktg) Hayatuddin, Raihan Ramadhan; Putri, Citraresmi Widoretno
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v8i1.9565

Abstract

Debt collection practices by third-party collectors generate persistent tension between the contractual rights of financing institutions and the legally protected entitlements of consumers. This study examines how debt collection ethics can be structured to simultaneously serve creditor interests and safeguard consumer rights, employing a normative juridical methodology with comparative and case-based approaches across four jurisdictions: Indonesia, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Analysis of the Kotamobagu District Court Decision Number 97/Pdt.G.S/2022/PN Ktg reveals that violations of collection ethics impose direct legal liability on financing institutions. The comparative analysis demonstrates that Indonesia's regulatory framework remains fragmented and lacks enforcement coherence, in contrast to the dedicated federal statute of the United States, the United Kingdom's mandatory licensing regime, and Australia's substantial financial penalties. This study concludes that equilibrium between creditor and debtor interests is achievable only through five core ethical principles: transparent communication, proportionality of enforcement, strict adherence to fiduciary execution procedures, respect for fundamental consumer rights, and full institutional accountability for collector conduct. These findings underscore the urgency of enacting a comprehensive, standalone regulatory instrument governing debt collection in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Avatar, Muhammad Raja Baransano, Jeremia Dori, Evan Gibran, Rizal Ananda Hendarwin, Rasendriya Hidayat, Muhammad Rahmadzani Ibran, Jevon Alama Ladjar, Lidwina Tuto Lazarus, Lazarus Mulya, Ilham Indra Putra, Gilang Putri, Citraresmi Widoretno Simanjuntak, Max Doan