Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Kedudukan Anak Perempuan dalam Hukum Waris Sunni dan Syiah: Kajian tentang Keadilan dan Penerapannya di Nusa Tenggara Barat Suryadin, Suryadin; Arkiang, Bachder Syarif; Yumansyah, Diky; Zuhrah, Zuhrah
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 1: April - September 2025
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i1.447

Abstract

Islamic inheritance law constitutes a paradigmatic arena of debate concerning gender justice. This debate primarily concerns the position of daughters, which differs fundamentally between the Sunni and Shia schools of thought. This study has three objectives: first, to comparatively analyze the position of daughters in the legal constructions of Sunni and Shia inheritance law; second, to map the implementation of this law within the landscape of legal pluralism in West Nusa Tenggara; and third, to evaluate the materialization of gender justice in prevailing practices. This study employs a mixed-methods design with a sequential explanatory strategy. It combines doctrinal analysis of primary jurisprudential texts, an examination of court decisions, in-depth interviews with judges and customary leaders, and a survey of 150 heads of households in three representative locations in West Nusa Tenggara. The results reveal three layers of conflict. First, a philosophical conflict between the principles of ‘aṣabah (Sunni) and qarābah (Shia). Second, a variation in implementation at the judicial level, ranging from rigid-formalistic to adaptive-collaborative, which is heavily influenced by the hegemony of patriarchal customary law. Third, a quantitatively measured gender justice deficit caused by the interaction among the formalism of state law (the Compilation of Islamic Law), the dominance of patriarchal culture, and low gender literacy. It is concluded that gender injustice in inheritance practices in West Nusa Tenggara is structural. This problem cannot be resolved merely through the reform of legal texts but requires a holistic approach that includes critical education and the strengthening of substantive justice mechanisms.
Reformulasi Kedudukan MPR Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Pasca-Amandemen UUD 1945 Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Islam Kontemporer Yumansyah, Diki; Arkiang, Bachder Syarif; Ramadhan, M. Jasuli; Al Farid , Muhammad; Muhtar
Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): Maqasid Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam
Publisher : Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/mqs.v14i2.26944

Abstract

This research examines the reformulation of the status of the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR) within Indonesia’s constitutional system after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution, using a convergent approach between positive constitutional law and contemporary Islamic constitutional thought. Following the amendments, the MPR was transformed from the highest state institution into a high state organ equal to others, thereby losing part of its strategic function. By employing the principles of shūrā, ahl al-ḥall wa al-ʿaqd, and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, this study offers an alternative perspective to strengthen the role of the MPR as a moral-constitutional institution. The findings reveal that integrating Islamic ethical values with Pancasila has the potential to enrich the substantive dimension of Indonesian democracy. The reformulation emphasizes the importance of reinforcing ideological evaluative functions, establishing a national deliberative forum, and enhancing the ethical capacity of MPR members as strategic efforts toward more dignified and just governance.
FORMULATION OF ISLAMIC CRIMINAL LAW POLICY AS A JURIDICAL INSTRUMENT FOR MAINTAINING THE BALANCE OF POWER AMONG STATE INSTITUTIONS Suryadin, Suryadin; Arkiang, Bachder Syarif; Yumansyah, Diky; Mohammad, Burhanuddin; Syamsuddin, Syamsuddin; Musmuliyadin, Musmuliyadin; Putra, Anggar
istinbath Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ijhi.v24i2.1043

Abstract

This study conceptually explores the possibility of integrating Islamic criminal law, particularly the doctrine of taʿzīr, into Indonesia’s constitutional framework of checks and balances. Rather than proposing an institutional mechanism, the paper normatively analyzes how Islamic ethical values such as ʿadl (justice), maslahah (public welfare), and hisbah (moral accountability) can enrich the moral foundation of state governance. The analysis is conducted through a qualitative normative approach based on secondary legal materials, including constitutional theory, Islamic jurisprudence, and contemporary scholarly discourse. The paper argues that taʿzīr, while traditionally applied to individual moral violations lacking explicit textual sanctions, may serve as a philosophical reference for enhancing ethical responsibility among state officials. However, this requires a clear epistemological distinction between taʿzīr as a moral-legal doctrine and checks and balances as a political-institutional system. The integration, therefore, should not be understood as a merger of institutional powers but as a normative dialogue between divine ethics and constitutional governance. The study concludes that Islamic criminal law contributes by offering an ethical corrective dimension to Indonesia’s democratic system, emphasizing moral accountability and justice without undermining legal pluralism or constitutional principles.