Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.606
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal RISA Tadbir Muwahhid DE'RECHTSSTAAT Jurnal Sosial Humaniora JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW Karimah Tauhid Humaniorum Journal
Ilman Khairi
Universitas Djuanda Bogor
Religion Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : DE'RECHTSSTAAT

 1 
DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN PRINCIPLES DROIT DE PREFERENCE AGAINST OWNERS BUSINESS PREMISES IN TANAH ABANG JAKARTA Ilman Khairi; Martin Roestamy
JURNAL HUKUM DE'RECHTSSTAAT Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): Jurnal HUKUM DE'RECHTSSTAAT
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Djuanda Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (750.435 KB) | DOI: 10.30997/jhd.v3i2.960

Abstract

Use Rights Certificate Business Place (SHPTU) is proof of ownership of the right to use business premises (shop) in a market that is owned by market traders. SHPTU have a fairly high economic value. Therefore expected SHPTU can be used as loan collateral. SHPTU have a common element of the lease, as in article 1548 of the Civil Code. Because SHPTU not the right material, then SHPTU can not be guaranteed by using a material guarantee institutions. This thesis research methods with the added element of normative juridical empirical, with the analysis of qualitative data. From the analysis it can be concluded that SHPTU not the right material, but given SHPTU has economic value and can be transferred, it is expected that the government can immediately respond to the needs of society (the Merchants Market) to the existence of a guarantee institution which can accommodate SHPTU shop as loan collateral. Resulting from the rigidity of the legal material to deliver the right material on business premises or SHPTU recommended for use kaedah contained in Article 48-49 of the legislation Flats by issuing Certificates of Building Owners and Building (SKBG), where the issuance of the certificate is the same between Local government in this case the Department of Public Works and the Department of Housing, while still managing PD Pasar Jaya as it has been running for this. Issuing authority on the issuance of a certificate is not PD Pasar Jaya but agency in charge of publishing the SKBG. When referring to the Building Act SKBG publishing at the Department of Public Works, and when referring to the Law on Housing, the publishing SKBG by the Department of Housing. That way it is assured of legal certainty as mandated by state law, as well as the grand theory of Hans Kelsen. SKBG is way out proof of ownership of the store, which is very expensive because of the value it needs the necessary legal certainty regarding the right material.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR HOME BUYERS AGAINST DEFAULT BY DEVELOPERS Sizia, Aleynca; Khairi, Ilman; Ilyanawati, R. Yuniar Anisa
DE'RECHTSSTAAT 2024: SPECIAL ISSUE ON DJUANDA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCES (DICSS) 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Djuanda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Legal protection for home buyers is very important when developers default, one of which is by guaranteeing the house certificate that has been purchased to a third party, such as banks or other financial institutions. This practice is detrimental to buyers because it can cause the house certificate that should be the buyer's right to become collateral for the developer's debt. As a result, buyers risk losing the rights to the house they have purchased if the developer fails to pay off their debts. According to Consumer Protection Law No. 8 of 1999, these practices run counter to the idea of good faith in the agreement and infringe upon the rights of consumers. Buyers who suffer losses due to the developer's failure have the right to demand that their rights be fulfilled, that they be compensated, or that the agreement be cancelled, according to the Civil Code (KUHPer), particularly Articles 1320 and 1267. The goal of the guarantee cannot disregard the rights of other parties, such as homebuyers, as stated in Law No. 4 of 1996, which deals with Dependent Rights. Strict government oversight and openness in property purchasing and selling activities are necessary for more effective legal protection. Furthermore, in order to prevent any losses caused by developer default, purchasers are urged to exercise greater caution in verifying the certificate's legitimacy before to finalizing a deal.
Co-Authors Abraham Yazdi Martin AHMAD MIFTAH, AHMAD Andri Brawijaya Carenina, Kania Esa Djatmiko, Sugeng Fauzi Ahmad Muda Harsono, Didid Sony Nor Ilyanawati, R. Yuniar Anisa Monaya, Nova Rania, Anindira Annisya Roestamy, Martin Sanjaya, Eka Wahyu Sihotang, Andien Hasea Sihotang, Sudiman Sizia, Aleynca Suryani, Danu Tini Kartini Wati, Rosna