Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN PRINCIPLES DROIT DE PREFERENCE AGAINST OWNERS BUSINESS PREMISES IN TANAH ABANG JAKARTA Khairi, Ilman; Martin, Abraham Yazdi
JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW Vol 9, No 2 (2017): JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW VOL.9 NO.2 2017
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Sekolah Pascasarjana Unida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (972.843 KB) | DOI: 10.30997/jill.v9i2.1034

Abstract

Use Rights Certificate Business Place (SHPTU) is proof of ownership of the right to use business premises (shop) in a market that is owned by market traders. SHPTU have a fairly high economic value. Therefore, expected SHPTU can be used as loan collateral. SHPTU have a common element of the lease, as in article 1548 of the Civil Code. Because SHPTU not the right material, then SHPTU can not be guaranteed by using a material guarantee institutions. The research method with the added element of normative juridical empirical, with the analysis of qualitative data. From the analysis it can be concluded that SHPTU not the right material, but given SHPTU has economic value and can be transferred, it is expected that the government can immediately respond to the needs of society (the Merchants Market) to the existence of a guarantee institution which can accommodate SHPTU shop as loan collateral. Resulting from the rigidity of the legal material to deliver the right material on business premises or SHPTU recommended for use kaedah contained in Article 48-49 of the legislation Flats by issuing Certificates of Building Owners and Building (SKBG), where the issuance of the certificate is the same between Local government in this case the Department of Public Works and the Department of Housing, while still managing PD Pasar Jaya as it has been running for this. Issuing authority on the issuance of a certificate is not PD Pasar Jaya but agency in charge of publishing the SKBG. When referring to the Building Act SKBG publishing at the Department of Public Works, and when referring to the Law on Housing, the publishing SKBG by the Department of Housing. That way it is assured of legal certainty as mandated by state law, as well as the grand theory of Hans Kelsen. SKBG is way out proof of ownership of the store, which is very expensive because of the value it needs the necessary legal certainty regarding the right material.Keyword: Droit De’ Preference, UMKM, Shops
GENIUS LOCI IN WOT BATU Khairi Ilman Chandra ; Caecilia S. Wijayaputri
Riset Arsitektur (RISA) Vol 3 No 04 (2019): RISET ARSITEKTUR "RISA"
Publisher : Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (908.12 KB) | DOI: 10.26593/risa.v3i04.3518.328-344

Abstract

Abstract- In a modern environment, the existence of genius loci is starting to become rare. Places seem to lose their defining characteristics and this diminishes people’s experience with them. In 2015, Sunaryo succeeded in building Wot Batu as a place that can exemplify a “man-made place” created in “modern” times that can showcase the existence of a genius loci. Therefore, this research discusses the factors that contribute to the emergence of genius loci and how it emerged in Wot Batu. This research employs a descriptive-qualitative approach. The researcher analyzes theories that are related to definitions of, factors that constitute place, and types of genius loci, which are then utilized to provide an observation of the object. The data that is gathered consist of organizations of spatial structure and articulation of concrete properties. In addition, the researcher also interviewed Sunaryo Sutono about the background of Wot Batu.  The researcher identifies and classifies said data in a table of factors that constitute place which are then summarized to serve as a basis for explaining the genius loci that is established in Wot Batu. In Wot Batu, the creator’s strong intent to express spiritual meanings is accomplished in a specific way. The complexity of that spiritual understanding is manifested in its spatial structures and concrete properties that are impressively detailed. The ideas and personal life experiences that were once only found in Sunaryo Sutono’s mind are brought into the world as a very specific place, and those things eventually coalesce into a totality and form genius loci that is meaningful to its user.  Key Words: genius loci, Wot Batu, Sunaryo, Ciburial Bandung
DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN PRINCIPLES DROIT DE PREFERENCE AGAINST OWNERS BUSINESS PREMISES IN TANAH ABANG JAKARTA Ilman Khairi; Martin Roestamy
JURNAL HUKUM DE'RECHTSSTAAT Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): Jurnal HUKUM DE'RECHTSSTAAT
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Djuanda Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (750.435 KB) | DOI: 10.30997/jhd.v3i2.960

Abstract

Use Rights Certificate Business Place (SHPTU) is proof of ownership of the right to use business premises (shop) in a market that is owned by market traders. SHPTU have a fairly high economic value. Therefore expected SHPTU can be used as loan collateral. SHPTU have a common element of the lease, as in article 1548 of the Civil Code. Because SHPTU not the right material, then SHPTU can not be guaranteed by using a material guarantee institutions. This thesis research methods with the added element of normative juridical empirical, with the analysis of qualitative data. From the analysis it can be concluded that SHPTU not the right material, but given SHPTU has economic value and can be transferred, it is expected that the government can immediately respond to the needs of society (the Merchants Market) to the existence of a guarantee institution which can accommodate SHPTU shop as loan collateral. Resulting from the rigidity of the legal material to deliver the right material on business premises or SHPTU recommended for use kaedah contained in Article 48-49 of the legislation Flats by issuing Certificates of Building Owners and Building (SKBG), where the issuance of the certificate is the same between Local government in this case the Department of Public Works and the Department of Housing, while still managing PD Pasar Jaya as it has been running for this. Issuing authority on the issuance of a certificate is not PD Pasar Jaya but agency in charge of publishing the SKBG. When referring to the Building Act SKBG publishing at the Department of Public Works, and when referring to the Law on Housing, the publishing SKBG by the Department of Housing. That way it is assured of legal certainty as mandated by state law, as well as the grand theory of Hans Kelsen. SKBG is way out proof of ownership of the store, which is very expensive because of the value it needs the necessary legal certainty regarding the right material.
AKSELERASI BADAN USAHA MILIK DAERAH (BUMD) DI KABUPATEN BOGOR Danu Suryani; Tini Kartini; Ilman Khairi
Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Vol. 10 No. 1 (2019): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Djuanda Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (237.169 KB) | DOI: 10.30997/jsh.v10i1.1723

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Daerah (BUMD) khususnya di Kabupaten Bogor. Untuk mencapai tujuan ini dilakukan beberapa kegiatan penelitian dengan metode penelitian Kajian Yuridis Normatif atau disebut juga penelitian  doktrinal, Kajian Yuridis Sosiologis. Dari kajian yang dilakukan sejauh ini dapat kami jelaskan bahwa kontributsi BUMD pada peningkatan APBD masih terlalu kecil bahkan untuk beberapa BUMD cenderung merugi. Hal tersbut disebabkan oleh banyak factor yang diantaranya mulai dari proses pembuatan peraturan sebagai payung hukum kebijakan pada tingkat daerah yang masih sangat lemah, penyelenggaran BUMD masih belum dioprasikan dengan baik, lemahnya pengawasan dan penegakan hukum, serta lemahnya evaluasi dari kinerja BUMD masih belum merekomendasikan perbaikan bagi penyelenggaraan BUMD. Hal tersebut juga diperparah dari adanya hambatan-hambatan yang yang ada baik dari internal maupun eksternal. Oleh karenanya diperlukan model aturan hukum yang jelas, menjamin kepastian hukum minimal mengatur aspek planning, organizing, actuating, controlling dan evaluating sehingga dapat meminimalisir penyimpangan dan adanya tansparansi dan akuntabilitas dari setiap BUMD.
DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN PRINCIPLES DROIT DE PREFERENCE AGAINST OWNERS BUSINESS PREMISES IN TANAH ABANG JAKARTA Ilman Khairi; Abraham Yazdi Martin
JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW Vol. 9 No. 2 (2017): Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law
Publisher : Magister Hukum Sekolah Pascasarjana Unida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (972.843 KB) | DOI: 10.30997/jill.v9i2.1034

Abstract

Use Rights Certificate Business Place (SHPTU) is proof of ownership of the right to use business premises (shop) in a market that is owned by market traders. SHPTU have a fairly high economic value. Therefore, expected SHPTU can be used as loan collateral. SHPTU have a common element of the lease, as in article 1548 of the Civil Code. Because SHPTU not the right material, then SHPTU can not be guaranteed by using a material guarantee institutions. The research method with the added element of normative juridical empirical, with the analysis of qualitative data. From the analysis it can be concluded that SHPTU not the right material, but given SHPTU has economic value and can be transferred, it is expected that the government can immediately respond to the needs of society (the Merchants Market) to the existence of a guarantee institution which can accommodate SHPTU shop as loan collateral. Resulting from the rigidity of the legal material to deliver the right material on business premises or SHPTU recommended for use kaedah contained in Article 48-49 of the legislation Flats by issuing Certificates of Building Owners and Building (SKBG), where the issuance of the certificate is the same between Local government in this case the Department of Public Works and the Department of Housing, while still managing PD Pasar Jaya as it has been running for this. Issuing authority on the issuance of a certificate is not PD Pasar Jaya but agency in charge of publishing the SKBG. When referring to the Building Act SKBG publishing at the Department of Public Works, and when referring to the Law on Housing, the publishing SKBG by the Department of Housing. That way it is assured of legal certainty as mandated by state law, as well as the grand theory of Hans Kelsen. SKBG is way out proof of ownership of the store, which is very expensive because of the value it needs the necessary legal certainty regarding the right material.Keyword: Droit De’ Preference, UMKM, Shops
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI RAKYAT PENGGUNA TEMPAT USAHA DI PASAR TRADISIONAL DALAM RANGKA MENDAPATKAN SUMBER DANA Ilman Khairi
JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW Vol. 15 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law
Publisher : Magister Hukum Sekolah Pascasarjana Unida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Certificate of Right to Use a Business Place (SHPTU) is proof of ownership of a right to use a business place (stall) in a market owned by market traders. SHPTU has a fairly high economic value. Therefore it is expected that SHPTU can be used as collateral for credit. SHPTU have something in common elements by leasing as in article 1548 of the Civil Code. This study aims to examine how legal protection for users of business premises in traditional markets can be applied and implemented for the ownership of business premises. The research method used in this study is normative juridical research method by adding empirical elements, with qualitative data analysis. Exploring and analyzing data in the form of documents complemented by factual data in the field so that appropriate conclusions can be drawn. The research findings show that SHPTU is not a material right, but considering that SHPTU has economic value and can be transferred. SHPTU of this valuable stall allows it to be used as collateral for credit by referring to the methods contained in Articles 48-49 concerning the Law on Flats by issuing Certificates of Ownership of Buildings and Buildings (SKBG), where the issuance of certificates is the same between Regional Governments in this case Public Works and Housing Services. SKBG is a way out for proof of stall ownership, because the value is very expensive, legal certainty is needed regarding material rights. Keywords: SHPTU; Legal Protection; UMKM.
Kajian Hukum Fungsi Penyidikan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penggelapan (Studi Fungsi Sat Reskrim Polres Bogor) Carenina, Kania Esa; Monaya, Nova; Khairi, Ilman
Karimah Tauhid Vol. 3 No. 5 (2024): Karimah Tauhid
Publisher : Universitas Djuanda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i5.13122

Abstract

Tindak pidana penggelapan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan merupakan suatu perbuatan yang sudah diatur secara tegas dalam pasal 371 KUHP.  Dan UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2023, Namun kenyataannya masih ada yang melakukan pelanggaran atau dengan sengaja menggelapkan apa yang ada dalam kekuasaannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkai tentang fungsi penyidikan terhadap tindak pidana penggelapan. penelitian yuridis empiris yaitu penelitian yang menggunaan gejala yang terjadi dalam masyarakat, masalah tersebut akan dikaji dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, selain itu juga menggunakan teori, asas dan doktrin sebagai rujukan untuk mengkaji masalah yang diteliti. Hasil penelitian menjukkan bahwa fungsi penyidikan terhadapa tindak pidana penggelapan dilaukan berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dengan mengikuti prosedur hukum acara yang berlaku. Penegakan hukumnya meliputi tindakan preventif dan represif.
Analisis Yuridis Pengamanan Rumah Dinas Pejabat Setingkat Menteri RI oleh Anggota Brimob Berdasarkan Perkap Nomor 4 Tahun 2017 Miftah, Ahmad; Monaya, Nova; Khairi, Ilman
Karimah Tauhid Vol. 3 No. 5 (2024): Karimah Tauhid
Publisher : Universitas Djuanda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i5.13274

Abstract

Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia memiliki hubungan dan kerja sama dengan badan, lembaga, serta instansi di dalam dan di luar negeri didasarkan atas sendi-sendi hubungan fungsional, saling menghormati, saling membantu, mengutamakan kepentingan umum, serta memperhatikan hierarki. Salah satu tugas yang dimeban Kepolisian yaitu  melakukan tugas pengamanan rumah dinas pejabat setingkat menteri dalam hal ini Menteri Dalam Negeri RI sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 4 Tahun 2017 tentang Penugasan Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia di Luar Struktur Organisasi Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui penelaahan data yang dapat diperoleh dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, buku teks, jurnal, hasil penelitian, ensiklopedi, bibliografi dan indeks kumulatif dan lain-lain. Tahap penelitian terdiri dari penelitian kepustakaan dalam upaya mencari data sekunder dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier, sedangkan data dianalisis secara kualitatif. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis sesuai atau tidaknya penugasan Brimob dan efektivitas serta hambatan dalam pengamanan rumah dinas pejabat setingkat Menteri RI dan cara mengatasinya. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa penugasan Brimob dalam pengamanan rumah dinas pejabat setingkat Menteri RI sudah sesuai dengan Perkap Nomor 4 Tahun 2017. Efektivitas dalam pengamanan rumah dinas pejabat setingkat Menteri RI dapat dilihat dari penilaian keamanan rumah dinas, analisis insiden keamanan, pengukuran respons time, analisis kepuasan pemangku kepentingan, pemantauan kinerja, dan analisis keberhasilan pencegahan. Dengan protap yang jelas dan terarah, maka efektivitas tugas brimob dalam tugas pengamanan rumah Dinas pejabat setingkat menteri sangat terorganisir dengan baik.
Analisis Yuridis Pengajuan Pinjaman Uang Muka Kredit Kepemilikan Rumah Bagi Pegawai Negeri Pada Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Berdasarkan Perkap No 4 Tahun 2016 Harsono, Didid Sony Nor; Sihotang, Sudiman; Khairi, Ilman
Karimah Tauhid Vol. 3 No. 7 (2024): Karimah Tauhid
Publisher : Universitas Djuanda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i7.14212

Abstract

Rumah merupakan kebutuhan pokok bagi setiap warga negara, oleh karena itu memiliki ttanggung jawab dalam menyediakan dan memberikan kemudahan untuk memperoleh rumah bagi masyarakat melalui penyelenggaraan perumahan dan kawasan permukiman termasuk bagi Pegawai Negeri pada Polri. Tujuan Penelitian: Untuk mengetahui prosedur pengajuan pinjaman uang muka kredit kepemilikan rumah bagi  pegawai negeri pada Kepolisian negara Republik Indonesia berdasarkan Perkap No. 4 tahun 2016.Untuk mengetahui hambatan yang dihadapi anggota Kepolisian Republik Indonesia dalam mengajukan pinjaman uang muka untuk Kredit Pemilikan Rumah berdasarkan Perkap No. 4 Tahun 2016. Metode Penelitian yaitu Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif yaitu hukum dikonsepsikan sebagai norma, kaidah, asas atau dogma-dogma. Hasil Penelitian ini yaitu Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 Tentang Tata Cara Pengajuan dan Pemberian Pinjaman Uang Muka Kredit Pemilikan Rumah Bagi Pegawai Negeri pada Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Bagi anggota  Polri yang belum pernah memiliki rumah sendiri biasanya memiliki keraguan dalam mengajukan Kredit Pemilikan Rumah (KPR). Hal ini wajar saja karena bagi anggota belum cukup akrab dengan proses pengajuan kredit, baik Kredit Pemilikan Rumah atau kredit lainnya dan selalu merasa gaji masih pas-pasan.
Analisis Yuridis Keputusan Pembaruan Hak Guna Usaha yang Sedang Dibebani Hak Tanggungan dalam Kredit Sindikasi Sihotang, Andien Hasea; Monaya, Nova; Khairi, Ilman
Karimah Tauhid Vol. 3 No. 10 (2024): Karimah Tauhid
Publisher : Universitas Djuanda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i10.15622

Abstract

Salah satu tanda bukti hak dalam UUPA adalah Sertipikat Hak Guna Usaha (SHGU) yaitu hak untuk mengusahakan tanah yang dikuasai langsung oleh negara yang diberikan kepada perusahaan dalam batas waktu tertentu untuk keperluan pertanian, perikanan atau peternakan. Perusahaan yang menjalankan kegiatan usaha dibidang perkebunan diberi HGU dan dalam kegiatan pengikatan kredit dan pengikatan jaminan atas fasilitas pembiayaan usaha perkebunan HGU menjadi jaminan utama yang pengikatannya sebagai jaminan dilaksanakan sesuai dengan Undang- Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 Tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Beserta Benda-Benda Yang Berkaitan Dengan Tanah (UUHT). Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis nilai hak tanggungan terhadap pembaruan HGU yang sedang dibebani hak tanggungan jika luas tanahnya berkurang dan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis hambatan dalam mengurus pembaruan HGU yang sedang dibebani hak tanggungan dan bagaimana cara mengatasinya serta untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis hambatandalam mengurus pembaruan HGU yang sedang dibebani hak tanggungan. Penelitian ini termasuk jenis penelitian hukum yuridis normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang mengutamakan data sekunder terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif-analitis yaitu penelitian yang berusaha mendeskripsikan gejala-gejala hukum atau fakta-fakta hukum yang berkaitan dengan surat keputusan pembaruan SHGU yang sedang dibebani hak tanggungan. Nilai tanah lahan HGU hasil pembaruan yang dibebani hak tanggungan nilai ekonominya bisa bertambah dibandingkan dengan nilai awal pada saat pengikatan APHT dilaksanakan karena pada saat awal pengikatan hak tanggungan dilaksanakan tanah lahan HGU tersebut belum produktif/belum menghasilkan. Adapun yang menjadi hambatan proses pembaruan HGU antara lain: terlantarnya tanah HGU dan pemanfaatan lahan untuk kepentingan masyarakat seperti sekolah, rumah sakit, pemakaman dan lain-lain sehingga dimungkinkannya terbit hak-hak lain di atas tanah yang telah dimanfaatkan tersebut.