Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Feri Pramudya Suhartanto
Unknown Affiliation
Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Civil Law dan Common Law Feri Pramudya Suhartanto; Yenny Febrianty
Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Juni: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konsensus.v1i3.218

Abstract

The civil law and common law systems are two primary approaches in global legal systems, each with unique principles, histories, and applications. Civil law, widely implemented in most European countries and those influenced by the Roman system, is based on the systematic codification of written laws. The main sources of this law are legal codes and legislation issued by legislative bodies. Judges interpret the law by referring to the established legal texts. On the other hand, common law developed in England and subsequently influenced countries that were once British colonies, such as the United States and Australia. This system emphasizes legal precedents set by judges' decisions in previous cases. Its principle is the doctrine of stare decisis, which means respecting previous decisions when similar cases arise in court. Key differences between them include the way laws are formed, the role of judges, and the approach to evidence. Civil law tends to be more structured and based on legislation, whereas common law is more flexible, relying on case interpretations to form the law. Nonetheless, globalization has led to the adoption of elements from both systems in other countries, creating hybrid or mixed systems in modern legal practice.
Penerapan Ketentuan Kepailitan Terhadap Bank yang Bermasalah Feri Pramudya Suhartanto; Muhamad Fadly Darmawan; Noval Febriansyah; Zahra Febriani Nugraha; Hany Fauziyyah Irawan; Farahdinny Siswajanthy
Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Agustus : KONSENSUS : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konsensus.v1i4.221

Abstract

This study explores the implementation of bankruptcy provisions for troubled banks. The aim is to analyze the legal and economic impacts of bankruptcy processes on banks facing financial difficulties. The research methodology involves legal studies and economic analyses of bankruptcy cases involving banks. The results underscore the importance of appropriately implementing bankruptcy provisions to efficiently and effectively address troubled banks. Findings indicate that failure to implement adequate bankruptcy provisions can have serious consequences for financial system stability. The study emphasizes the need for clear policies and efficient mechanisms to address financially troubled banks to maintain overall financial system stability. The implications of this research provide guidance for regulators and legal practitioners in developing policies related to handling financially troubled banks. In conclusion, the study highlights the necessity of clear policies and efficient mechanisms in addressing financially troubled banks to maintain overall financial system stability.
Co-Authors Farahdinny Siswajanthy Hany Fauziyyah Irawan Muhamad Fadly Darmawan Noval Febriansyah Yenny Febrianty Zahra Febriani Nugraha