Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.391
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal UNES Journal of Swara Justisia International Journal of Social Service and Research Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science PATTIMURA Legal Journal Mimbar Hukum Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Return : Study of Management, Economic and Bussines Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Journal of Social Science Rechtsnormen Journal of Law Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean
Bakir, Herman
Department Of Law, Universitas Ekasakti
Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

 1   2 
DETERMINASI ILMU HUKUM DI PANGGUNG JUS DICERE: SEBUAH TITIK AKHIR POTRET GENEOLOGIS DARI MEDAN PENGOLAHAN HUKUM PRAKTIS, INTRAYUDISIAL DAN EKSTRAYUDISIAL Herman Bakir
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/jih.v8i1.6745

Abstract

AbstractThis paper aims to theoretically describe a genealogical feature of science which because of itsown orientative profundity has received the awarding of the title of the legal theory as “the authentic legal science”, namely: science of law, especially by looking at the activities that this science has done in forums Jus Dicere. The method used in this descriptive effort is called normative-theoretical, while the starting point (approach) is a juridical-interdisciplinary way of looking of Legal Theory, especially while this theoretical discipline must theorize the genetic potential of science of law itself. The results of this study are: (a) Genetically, science of law is a science that can separate itself into the family of engineering sciences, and the genuine science of law at this belief is Legal Engineering; (b) Jus Dicere is a much wider area than Jus Dare, as a place where the science of law demonstrates all itsown potential, or expertises/skills as an engineering sciences and technology; (c) in this capacity, the science of law does not merely appear as a Technique of Legislative Drafting (Jus Dare); but also as an Technique of Investigation; Technique of Prosecution; Technique of Adjudication; Technique of Notaryship; Technique of Court Proceedings; Advocacy Techniques for Criminal Law Cases; etc (Jus Dicere). The theoretical explanations related to geneology, as well as the daily tasks of science of law are important, especially in relation to the development of the disciplinary paradigm of the science that we call the science of law. Finally, however, this paper wants to promise its readers a more convincing theoretical insight regarding the theoretical knowledge of science of law, whether it is at the state of inactive, or when it is in motion. Keywords: The Science of Law, Family of Engineering Science, Legal Technique, The Stage of Jus Dicere AbstrakArtikel ini dimaksudkan untuk secara teoretis mendeskripsikan sebuah fitur geneologis dari ilmu yang karena kedalaman orientatifnya telah menerima penganugerahan Teori Hukum sebuah gelar sebagai “the authentic legal science”, yakni: Ilmu Hukum, terutama dengan memperhatikan kiprah ilmu disebutkan terakhir di forum-forum Jus Dicere. Metode dalam usaha deskriptif ini adalah normatif-teoretikal, sedangkan titik-tolaknya (pendekatannya) adalah cara melihat yang yuridis-interdisipliner dari Teori Hukum, terutama selagi disiplin ilmu teoretis ini harus berteori dengan sisi geneologis dari Ilmu Hukum itu sendiri. Hasil penelitian: (a) secara genetikal, llmu Hukum adalah ilmu yang mengelompokkan diri ke dalam keluarga ilmu-ilmu teknikal, dan oleh karenanya Ilmu Hukum yang sesungguhnya itu dengan bertolak dari keyakinan ini disebut “Teknik Hukum”; (b) Jus Dicere merupakan lahan yang jauh lebih luas di banding Jus Dare, tempat di mana Ilmu Hukum mendemonstrasikan segenap potensi, atau keahlian/keterampilan teknisnya sebagai suatu ilmu yang mandiri secara disipliner; (c) dalam terminologi ini (Teknik Hukum), llmu Hukum tidak sekedar tampil sebagai Teknik Perundang-undangan (Jus Dare); tapi juga sebagai Teknik Penyidikan; Teknik Penuntutan; Teknik Kehakiman; Teknik Kenotariatan; Teknik Beracara; Teknik Advokasi; dan lain sebagainya (Jus Dicere). Akhirnya, bagaimanapun tulisan ini ingin menghadirkan kepada pembacanya sebuah wawasan teoretis yang lebih meyakinkan terkait pengetahuan-pengetahuan teoretis tentang Ilmu Hukum, baik saat diam, ataupun saat bergerak. Kata Kunci: Ilmu Hukum, Keluarga Ilmu Teknikal, Teknik Hukum, Panggung Jus Dicere
Strategi Burden & Salvage: Formula yuridik untuk terapi doktrinal, phobia pajak karbon Bakir, Herman
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This text introduces the burden & salvage doctrine, a formula providing an alternative path to develop a solid lex specialis within the realm of Pigouvian tax. It promotes a type of “juridical therapy” for the Indonesian government to overcome their excessive “fear” of carbon taxes, which had led them to surrender and revoke the program until the end of President Joko Widodo’s tenure Method: Data was gathered online using the World Wide Web’s search features to their fullest potential. Findings: Carbon tax should ideally be established by the legislation of the lex specialis type, characterized by the burden and salvage ideology. In this scheme, a carbon tax is essentially nothing more than a Pigouvian tax, not serving as a source of state revenue (unlike typical taxes). Vice versa, it serves as a long-term investment to guide society towards a modern existence characterized by a social life centred around a green economy, transportation, technology, and industry. The incurred costs will undoubtedly be substantial. Consequently, in the early stages of its implementation, it will “certainly” pose significant challenges for the government. This is because it involves the transformation of a nation—an issue of radical, fundamental, and comprehensive changes within a social structure. This seems unattainable in a nation ruled by a malevolent governmental system characterized by greed, selfishness, fascism, brutality, and corruption. The path will be smooth in a country where the government is a great philanthropist or an sinterklaas economie, providing significant funds and energy for sponsorship.
Legal Vacuum in Issuance and Revocation of Mining Business Permits Situmeang, Ojak; Bakir, Herman
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Daarut Thufulah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v2i4.1650

Abstract

Background: The management of Indonesia's abundant natural resources, particularly through mining activities, is closely tied to the issuance of permits governed by regulations such as the Mineral and Coal Law and its derivative laws. However, challenges like regulatory uncertainty, overlapping authority between central and regional governments, and inconsistent law enforcement create a legal vacuum that hinders the effectiveness of permit issuance and revocation. Objectives: This study aims to analyze the mechanisms for issuing and revoking mining business permits in Indonesia. It also seeks to identify legal challenges and provide recommendations to strengthen the legal framework and ensure effective implementation. Methods: This research employs a normative legal approach, focusing on the analysis of laws, regulations, and case studies related to mining business permits. Secondary data were analyzed qualitatively to evaluate the consistency and effectiveness of the legal framework. Research Findings: The findings reveal that the issuance and revocation processes are plagued by unclear regulations and fragmented governance. These issues result in regulatory inefficiencies and weak law enforcement, impeding sustainable resource management. Conclusion: To address the legal vacuum, reforms are required to ensure clarity, eliminate overlapping authority, and improve law enforcement. Strengthening the legal framework will enhance the management and regulation of mining permits in Indonesia.
REALISME HUKUM KARL LLEWELLYN VS. RANTAI-BAJA FORMALISME: PEMENANGAN CITRA KEARIFAN PRAGMATIS DALAM ALGORITMA THE LAW-JOB THEORY Bakir, Herman
Mimbar Hukum Vol 36 No 1 (2024): Mimbar Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/mh.v36i1.10434

Abstract

Abstract This project aims to highlight the anatomy of The Law-Job Theory, one of the most influential philosophical theories throughout Legal Realism. This theory emerged as a response to tearing through the web of illusion created by Formalism, which is suspected of “smuggling” monolithic dangers that often lurk behind the bland, flat, and seemingly “bloodless” processes of legal proceedings. Developed in US, it reflects the concerns of its initiator, Karl Llewellyn regarding the stiffness, rigidity, or hibernation in how formalist judges handle cases, often viewed with disdain by sharp-minded sociologists. The theory’s central idea is that law is “something that works.” Law works continuously to embody four administrative objectives that have become its absolute responsibility to realize: (a) resolving cases, (b) suppressing destructive behaviour, (c) delegating/revoking authority, and (d) maintaining harmony within social structures. For these works to achieve maximum effectiveness, the law requires adequate flexibility. The key lies in the hands of judges. They must transcend paper’s rigid certainties to prevent the law from losing its vital sociological essence and becoming a “cold, dysfunctional social force.” In their hands, the law is not static but progressive, evolving to reach the pinnacle of pragmatic maturity. Abstrak Proyek ini bertujuan mengetengahkan anatomi The Law-Job Theory, salah satu teori kefilsafatan yang dianggap paling berpengaruh dalam tradisi Realisme Hukum. Teori ini berupaya merobek jala ilusi Formalisme yang dicurigai menyelundupkan ancaman monolitik, yang sering kali mengintai di balik proses persidangan yang hambar, datar dan seakan “tidak memiliki darah”. Teori ini dikembangkan di Amerika, sebagai ungkapan kekhawatiran penggagasnya, Karl Llewellyn terkait kekakuan, rigiditas, atau hibernasi dalam cara hakim formalis mengapresiasi perkara-perkara, yang sering kali dianggap menjijikkan oleh sosiolog-sosiolog berpandangan tajam. Top of form idenya, hukum adalah “sesuatu yang bekerja”. Hukum bekerja sepanjang waktu, demi mengejawantahkan empat tujuan administratif yang secara mutlak telah menjadi tanggung jawabnya untuk merealisasikannya: (a) mendisposisikan perkara; (b) meredam perilaku destruktif; (c) mendelegasikan/mencabut otoritas; (d) mempertahankan harmoni dalam struktur-struktur sosial. Agar pekerjaan ini mencapai tingkat efisiensi dan efektivitas yang maksimum, yang diperlukan hukum adalah tingkat fleksibilitas yang memadai. Kuncinya di tangan hakim. Mereka harus mampu menjelajah lebih jauh, meninggalkan titik-kepastian yang kaku di atas kertas. Bagi teori ini, kepastian yang berlebihan dapat mengakibatkan hukum mengorbankan sebagian besar dari esensi sosiologisnya yang vital—mengubahnya menjadi “kekuatan sosial yang dingin-disfungsional”. Di tangan mereka perlu ditunjukkan bahwa hukum bukanlah sesuatu yang statis, melainkan progresif, tengah bertumbuh-kembang untuk mengincar taraf tertinggi dari hierarki kedewasaan yang pragmatis.
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES FOR LICENSEES IN THE EVENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT (IPR) OWNER BANKRUPTCY Maharani, Dhea Yulia; Bakir, Herman
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 4 No. 12 (2024): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v4i12.1127

Abstract

This research discusses the legal consequences that arise for licensees when the owner of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) experiences bankruptcy. The background of this research is the legal uncertainty regarding the fate of licenses granted by an IPR owner declared bankrupt, considering that the assets of the owner, including IPR, become part of the bankruptcy estate. The research method used is normative legal research, with a legislative approach and analysis of relevant court decisions. This research also uses secondary data in the form of related legal literature. The findings indicate that the bankruptcy of the IPR owner can potentially affect the rights and obligations of the licensee, especially concerning the continuity of the granted license. In some cases, the curator handling the bankruptcy estate has the authority to decide to continue or terminate the license agreement. However, legal protection for the licensee depends on the content of the license agreement and applicable legal provisions. Thus, the licensee is at risk of losing their licensing rights if there is no clear provision in the agreement or adequate legal protection from the law. This research recommends clearer regulations to protect licensees in situations where the owner of IPR experiences bankruptcy.
Implikasi Ambiguitas Kreditur Separatis Dan Kurator Dalam Pembagian Boedel Debitor Pailit Menurut Perspektif Philosophy Saija, Ronald; Tesalonika, Iming Maknaan; Bakir, Herman
PATTIMURA Legal Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2024): Agustus 2024 PATTIMURA Legal Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate Program Doctoral in Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/pela.v3i2.15556

Abstract

Introduction: Completing debt and receivables agreements with serious material security objects between creditors and debtors through the Bankruptcy route. Bankruptcy as a form of dispute resolution regulated in Articles 749-910 of Wetboek van Koophandel which has been codified through Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. Purposes of the Research: To find legal rules that specifically regulate the Ambiguity Implications of Separatist Creditors and Curators in Boedel, Debtors Bankruptcy. Methods of the Research: The method used in this writing is an extensive interpetation method to try to find a law in the future (ius constituendum) because there is still no legal rule that specifically regulates the Ambiguity Implications of Separatist Creditors and Curators in Boedel Debtors Bankruptcy. Then we also use a systematic interpretation method because in this study the author tries to relate several laws and regulations in Indonesia. Results Originality of the Research: The bankruptcy study is inseparable from the collateral by the debtor who has experienced business bankruptcy, which has given an advantage to separatist creditors and curators in executing the collateral before it is further studied by the Government through the Curator. In fact, through its superior nature, the settlement of receivables by separatist creditors is quite ambigiutive and comprehensive and fast without having to apply for bankruptcy of the previous debtor.
Legal Reconstruction of Partnership Agreements in the Oil Palm Plantation Revitalization Program Saputra, Firman; Bakir, Herman
Journal of Social Science Vol. 5 No. 6 (2024): Journal of Social Science
Publisher : Syntax Corporation Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jss.v5i6.947

Abstract

This research discusses the challenges and weaknesses in partnership agreements between PT. Boswa Megalopolis and the community of Aceh Jaya Regency, focusing on aspects of power imbalance, unclear provisions, and minimal legal protection for plasma farmers. Through an analysis of contributing factors such as social and economic structures, availability of information, and the limited role of the government, the need for regulatory reform and practical guidelines is identified to improve justice in partnerships. Furthermore, strengthening mediation institutions and implementing community-based partnership models are proposed as strategies to create sustainable partnerships. These findings are expected to provide insights for policymakers and stakeholders in creating a more just and sustainable partnership system in the oil palm plantation sector.
Strengthening the Role of Artificial Intelligence Technology in the Role of Court Judges in Indonesia Yanwiyatono, Yanwiyatono; Bakir, Herman
Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 3 No. 6 (2024): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies
Publisher : PT Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/edunity.v3i6.249

Abstract

This research explores the strengthening role of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in supporting the duties and responsibilities of court judges in Indonesia. In the digital era, the integration of AI in the judicial system is necessary to improve efficiency, accuracy, and fairness in legal decision-making. This research uses a qualitative method with literature studies, in-depth interviews, and case analysis from other countries that have implemented AI in their justice systems. The results show that AI can reduce judges' workload, speed up case resolution, and minimize human error and bias. However, there are challenges such as ethical issues, data privacy, and public trust in AI decisions. This research emphasizes the need for a clear regulatory framework and specialized training for judges to ensure the effective and responsible use of AI. In addition, the importance of collaboration between governments, legal institutions, and technology developers to create AI solutions that comply with the principles of fairness and transparency was expressed. In conclusion, although AI has great potential to strengthen the role of judges in Indonesia, its implementation must be done carefully to maintain the principles of fairness.
Eradication of Land Mafia in Indonesia by the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning of the Republic of Indonesia or the National Land Agency Amrullah, Amrullah; Bakir, Herman
Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 3 No. 11 (2024): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies
Publisher : PT Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/edunity.v3i11.329

Abstract

The land mafia in Indonesia is a complex phenomenon that harms society and has the potential to disrupt social stability. This research aims to analyze the practices of land mafia that occur in Indonesia and evaluate the eradication efforts by the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN). Land mafia practices include certificate forgery, illegal land occupation, and document manipulation that threaten the ownership rights of the community. This research uses normative legal research methods, which involve the process of finding legal rules, principles, and legal doctrines to answer the legal issues at hand. Furthermore, this research also examines the policies and strategic steps taken by the ATR/BPN in combating the land mafia, including the establishment of the Anti-Land Mafia Task Force and the strengthening of land regulations. The results indicate that despite various eradication efforts, challenges in law enforcement and inter-agency coordination remain obstacles. Therefore, better synergy between the government, society, and the private sector is necessary to create a transparent and accountable land system. This research is expected to contribute to the development of more effective policies in eradicating the land mafia in Indonesia and reinforcing legal protection for the community.
PENERAPAN UNSUR TINDAK PIDANA PERSETUBUHAN TERHADAP ANAK YANG DISEBARKAN MELALUI MEDIA SOSIAL PADA PENYIDIKAN Noviardi, Jeki; Fitriati, Fitriati; Bakir, Herman
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 5 No 3 (2021): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (Oktober 2021)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v5i3.223

Abstract

Pertimbangan Penyidik Pada Satreskrim Polres Kerinci Dalam Penerapan Unsur Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Terhadap Anak Yang Disiarkan Melalui Media Sosial adalah dengan hanya menerapkan unsur yang terdapat pada Pasal 76D jo Pasal 81 Ayat (1) Undang-undang RI No 35 tahun 2014, tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang RI Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak dan tidak mempertimbangkan perbuatan terdakwa merekam dan menyebar luaskan perbuatan persetubuhan tersebut dalam media sosial. Hal ini dilakukan dengan pertimbangan tingginya biaya pembuktian dan juga pertimbangan usia tersangka yang masih muda sehingga diharapkan dapat memperbaiki prilakunya. Kendala Yang Ditemui Penyidik Pada Satreskrim Polres Kerinci Dalam Penerapan Unsur Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Terhadap Anak Yang Disiarkan Melalui Media sosial adalah hambatan yang menyangkut segi sumber daya manusia dari penyidik. Penyidik yang kurang memahami materi undang undang perlindungan anak yang telah diperbaharui yaitu Undang undang nomor 35 tahun 2014 tentang perubahan atas undang undang nomor 23 tahun 2002 tentang perlindungan anak juga dalam hal menerapkan undang undang informasi transaksi elektronik karena perbuatan tersebut direkam yang kemudian disebar luaskan. Namun dalam penyidikan ini penyidik sama sekali tidak menerapkan unsur unsur yang terdapat dalam perundang undangan ITE tersebut. Penyidik beralasan karena adanya kesulitan dalam hal pengumpulan bukti dan pengujian kebenaran alat bukti.
Co-Authors Ahmad Redi, Ahmad Amrullah Amrullah Faisal Santiago, Faisal Ferdinal, Ocktave Fitriati Haq, Muhammad Alhadi Maharani, Dhea Yulia Mahmuddin Mahmuddin Mardisontori, Mardisontori Mukhtasar Syamsuddin Noviardi, Jeki Pone, Darlian Ronald Saija, Ronald Saputra, Firman Situmeang, Ojak Tesalonika, Iming Maknaan Waldo, Risky Wuisan, Ronald Samuel Yanwiyatono, Yanwiyatono