Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS STRATEGI DAN TANTANGAN KEBIJAKAN PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH DI INDONESIA Aini Kemala Dewi; Dymas Aditya Putra Kaharudin; Mutia Rahmah Sari; Siti Khomariah; Erinaldi
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 2 No. 11 (2025): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Edisi November 2025)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v2i11.1166

Abstract

Waste management has become a crucial global environmental issue in the 21st century due to its significant impact on ecosystems, public health, and sustainable development. Indonesia is one of the world's largest waste producers, generating around 35 million tons of waste per year, most of which comes from the household sector. The dominant types of waste include organic waste, plastic, and hazardous and electronic waste, but only about 31.7% is successfully recycled, while the rest still pollutes the environment. This condition shows that the implementation of policies as stipulated in Law Number 18 of 2008 concerning Waste Management, which emphasizes the 3R principle (reduce, reuse, recycle), is not yet optimal. Based on data from the National Waste Management Information System (SIPSN) in 2024, the five cities with the highest waste generation are Tangerang, South Jakarta, Surabaya, Bekasi, and Medan. This study aims to examine waste management strategies and challenges in these cities through library research, an approach that traces and analyzes various literature sources such as scientific journals, reports, and official data to gain a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of waste management policies and innovations in urban areas. The results of this study are expected to contribute to strengthening sustainable national waste management policies based on collaboration between the government and the community.
Transformasi Digital dalam Administrasi Publik: Studi Komparatif di Indonesia dan Korea Selatan Erinaldi, Erinaldi; Angelina Ramadhani; Murni Murni; Mutia Rahmah Sari; Ulfa Muti’ah
Studi Administrasi Publik dan ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Mei: Studi Administrasi Publik dan ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/studi.v3i2.994

Abstract

Digital transformation in public administration has become one of the strategic agendas in modern bureaucratic reform to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, transparency, and quality of public services. This study aims to analyze the digital transformation of public administration through a comparative study between Indonesia and South Korea, particularly in the implementation of digital government. This study uses a qualitative method with a comparative study approach and is supported by library research through secondary data collection from scientific journals, international agency reports, government policy documents, and relevant previous research. The data analysis technique uses descriptive-comparative analysis with the theoretical approaches of Digital Era Governance (DEG), Institutional Theory, New Public Management (NPM), and Socio-Technical Systems Theory. The results of the study show that South Korea has succeeded in developing an integrated digital government because it is supported by consistent national policies, strong data interoperability, high bureaucratic capacity, adaptive organizational culture, and equitable distribution of digital infrastructure. In contrast, Indonesia is still in the transition stage from e-government to digital government and faces various obstacles such as fragmentation of inter-agency systems, low data interoperability, inequality in digital infrastructure, limited ASN competency, and bureaucratic resistance to change. Based on the Digital Era Governance theory, South Korea has successfully implemented the principles of reintegration, needs-based holism, and digitization of changes, while Indonesia remains suboptimal in terms of bureaucratic integration and services based on public needs. This study concludes that the success of digital transformation in public administration is determined more by institutional strength and bureaucratic reform than simply by technology adoption. Therefore, Indonesia needs to prioritize digital transformation as a comprehensive national reform agenda to create a modern, responsive, and service-oriented government.