Raysha Aulia Fazila
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

URGENSI PENGUATAN NILAI MORAL DALAM POSITIVISME HUKUM UNTUK MENGATASI KRISIS KEADILAN PADA FENOMENA NO VIRAL NO JUSTICE DI INDONESIA Raysha Aulia Fazila; Irwan Triadi
MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Desember
Publisher : PT PUBLIKASI INSPIRASI INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62017/merdeka.v3i2.6186

Abstract

Fenomena No Viral No Justice di Indonesia menunjukkan bahwa penegakan hukum sering bersifat reaktif, baru berjalan efektif setelah mendapat tekanan opini publik. Hal ini mencerminkan krisis moral dalam sistem hukum positif, di mana kepatuhan pada prosedur formal sering mengabaikan keadilan substantif. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis perlindungan hukum di Indonesia dari perspektif filsafat hukum yang berorientasi pada keadilan dan moralitas serta mengevaluasi penguatan nilai moral dalam kerangka positivisme hukum sebagai solusi pemulihan keadilan dan kepercayaan publik. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan filsafat hukum, berbasis studi kepustakaan pada literatur hukum, jurnal ilmiah, peraturan perundang-undangan dan kasus keracunan sirup obat yang menewaskan ratusan anak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum positif di Indonesia, bila diterapkan tanpa landasan moral, cenderung kehilangan legitimasi dan gagal memberikan perlindungan substantif. Penguatan moralitas melalui reformasi prosedur hukum, pendidikan hukum berbasis etika dan penguatan integritas institusional terbukti menyeimbangkan kepastian hukum dengan keadilan substantif sehingga hukum menjadi instrumen yang adil, manusiawi dan dipercaya masyarakat.
A Comparative Study of Marriage Agreements Between Cross-National Couples in Indonesia and the Netherlands Cinta Rizqareka D; Erina Nur Afifa; Rania Syifa Busroni; Raysha Aulia Fazila; Muhamad Dafi Akbar; Dwi Aryanti Ramadhani
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17847469

Abstract

Marriages between Indonesian citizens and foreign nationals create complex legal consequences, particularly regarding the regulation of joint property and the legal status of the parties involved. A prenuptial agreement serves as an essential legal instrument to provide legal certainty and protection for the rights and obligations of both spouses. This study aims to analyze the differences in the regulation of prenuptial agreements for couples with different nationalities between Indonesia and the Netherlands, as well as to examine their implications for the recognition and enforcement of such agreements in both countries. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and comparative approaches, using primary legal materials such as the Indonesian Civil Code and the Dutch Burgerlijk Wetboek, along with secondary materials including legal literature and academic journals. The findings reveal that Indonesia still applies the joint property system as the default rule under Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, whereas the Netherlands, since 2018, has adopted the limited community of property system, which establishes the separation of personal property as the legal foundation. Moreover, the Netherlands grants couples with different nationalities the freedom to choose the applicable law through the choice of law mechanism as regulated in Council Regulation (EU) No. 2016/1103, while Indonesia does not yet have a clear mechanism in this regard. These differences have implications for legal certainty, regulatory flexibility, and the protection of spousal rights in mixed marriages