Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Social Work and Science Education
Rostari, Tri Emelia
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Guiding Science and Technology: A Systematic Literature Review on the Role of Philosophy of Science Sari, Tanti Permata; Sylvianica, Devi; Rostari, Tri Emelia; Lestari, Dian; Andani, Meri
Journal of Social Work and Science Education Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Social Work and Science Education
Publisher : Yayasan Sembilan Pemuda Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52690/jswse.v7i1.1322

Abstract

Philosophy of science has a very essential role in directing the development of science and technology. As a discipline that studies the nature, methods, and limitations of science, philosophy of science helps provide epistemological, ontological, and axiological foundations in the development of various scientific fields. This study aims to examine the role of philosophy of science in shaping scientific paradigms and its impact on the development of science and technology through the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach. By analyzing various studies published in the last five years, this study found that philosophy of science not only functions as a conceptual framework for the development of science, but also as an ethical guide in the use of technology. The research findings show that a deep understanding of the philosophy of science can improve the integration between technological innovation and human values, resulting in more responsible and sustainable scientific development. Thus, this study emphasizes the urgency of a philosophical approach in ensuring the direction of the development of science and technology that is in line with the needs of society and the principles of ethics and sustainability.
Application of Educational Philosophy in School Practice: A Systematic Literature Review Atnelie, Mike; Sulastri, Sulastri; Sari, Tanti Permata; Rostari, Tri Emelia; Muryanti, Tri
Journal of Social Work and Science Education Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Social Work and Science Education
Publisher : Yayasan Sembilan Pemuda Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52690/jswse.v7i1.1334

Abstract

This study aims to comprehensively examine how the application of educational philosophy manifests itself in modern school practice. Although the theoretical importance of educational philosophy has been widely discussed, a gap remains between the conceptual realm and its practical implementation in the educational field. To address this issue, this study employed the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method guided by the PRISMA protocol. Data were collected through a systematic search of databases such as Scopus, ERIC, and Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria were articles published between 2020 and 2025 that discussed the application of educational philosophy, particularly Constructivism, Progressivism, Humanism, and Existentialism, in the context of elementary and secondary school practice. The PRISMA process included identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion of articles to ensure transparency and validity of the study results. The review revealed that the application of educational philosophy in schools remains partial and dependent on the policy context, teacher readiness, and institutional culture. However, there is a positive trend toward a more reflective, participatory, and learner-centered approach. This research emphasizes the importance of integrating educational philosophy into pedagogical practices and policy recommendations so that philosophical values ​​do not stop at the ideal level, but are realized in real classroom actions.
Reconstructing Education through Progressivism: A Systematic Review of Recent Evidence Rostari, Tri Emelia; Sari, Tanti Permata; Elesti, Yesmi; Irzaleny, Meli; Sulastri, Sulastri
Journal of Social Work and Science Education Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Social Work and Science Education
Publisher : Yayasan Sembilan Pemuda Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52690/jswse.v7i1.1333

Abstract

This study aims to examine how the principles of progressivist educational philosophy are implemented in contemporary learning practices and to analyze their influence on the effectiveness of the teaching and learning process. The review addresses a clear research gap, namely the lack of recent systematic syntheses that critically examine progressivism-based learning within the context of modern educational challenges and empirical classroom practices. This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method by analyzing peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2019 and 2024. Relevant studies were retrieved from reputable databases such as Google Scholar, Scopus, and ERIC, using predefined inclusion criteria (focus on progressivist learning, empirical or conceptual relevance to education) and exclusion criteria (non-educational focus, non-peer-reviewed sources, and incomplete data). The results indicate that progressivist approaches consistently enhance learning quality by fostering student activeness, creativity, critical thinking, and intrinsic motivation. The synthesis highlights the central role of teachers as facilitators and the effectiveness of experiential learning in connecting educational content with real-life contexts. The novelty of this study lies in its integrative synthesis of recent literature that positions progressivism not only as a philosophical foundation but also as a practical framework for addressing current educational demands. Practically, the findings imply that educators and policymakers can adopt progressivist principles to design more student-centered, adaptive, and future-oriented learning environments.
Co-Authors Atnelie, Mike DIAN LESTARI Elesti, Yesmi Irzaleny, Meli Meri Andani, Meri Muryanti, Tri Sari, Tanti Permata Sulastri Sulastri Sylvianica, Devi