Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan SASI
Ardini, Ni Putu Ayu Meylan
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM LIABILITY FOR ILLEGAL PREMIUM ACCOUNT SALES: A STUDY OF SAFE HARBOR PRINCIPLES IN INDONESIA AND THE UNITED STATES Ardini, Ni Putu Ayu Meylan; Dharmawan, Ni Ketut Supasti; Hardiyan, Salwa Putri
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 54, No 3 (2025): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM (in press)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.54.3.2025.372-388

Abstract

The rapid development of Indonesia’s digital economy has created new opportunities but also significant challenges, particularly regarding the illegal sale of shared premium accounts on e-commerce platforms. This study examines the legal frameworks governing platform liability for these illegal activities, comparing Indonesia’s regulations with the United States' Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Using a doctrinal legal research method, the research focuses on key Indonesian laws such as the Copyright Law (Law No. 28 of 2014) and the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law), alongside Section 512 of the DMCA. The study finds that Indonesia's legal framework provides only implicit protections, relying on general principles like good faith and fault-based liability, which leads to legal uncertainty. In contrast, the United States’ DMCA offers clearer protections through its Safe Harbor provisions, including a specific notice-and-takedown procedure. This comparative analysis highlights the vulnerability of Indonesian platforms to lawsuits and the broader economic consequences, such as lost revenue, hindered innovation, and potential reputational damage. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need for clearer, consolidated regulations in Indonesia to effectively protect copyright holders and digital platforms. The study proposes a Sui Generis Safe Harbor Model that combines the procedural clarity of the DMCA with Indonesia’s civil law tradition, including the establishment of clear Red Flag Knowledge standards, a mandatory notice-and-takedown procedure, and data disclosure requirements. The research underscores the importance of regulatory reform, enhanced law enforcement coordination, and technological investment to address illegal premium account sales and secure a fair digital environment.
The Urgency of Alternative Regulations Resolution of Disputes Regarding Termination of Employment in Cases of Force Majeure Sudiarawan, Kadek Agus; Anggreni, Ni Made Gina; Ardini, Ni Putu Ayu Meylan
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 10, No 3 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um019v10i3p293-303

Abstract

This study aims to analyze termination of employment under force majeure circumstances, the dispute-resolution system based on statutory regulations, and alternative mechanisms that may be implemented to address disputes arising from such terminations. The research employs a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. The findings indicate that termination of employment by companies due to declining revenues leading to financial losses during periods of global crisis, which ultimately result in the temporary or permanent cessation of business operations, satisfies the characteristics of force majeure. The dispute resolution system for termination of employment under Law Number 2 of 2004 may be pursued through three mechanisms, namely bipartite negotiations conducted through deliberation to reach an agreement, tripartite procedures involving a third party through mediation, or adjudication before the Industrial Relations Court. Online dispute resolution, which enables dispute resolution without physical meetings by leveraging internet connectivity and video conferencing technology, represents an alternative model for resolving termination-of-employment disputes arising from force majeure that may be implemented in the future.
The Transformation of Hindu Dharma Values into Legal Norms: Ambiguity in the Awig-Awig of Kesian Customary Village Wacika, Made Wiswani; Ardini, Ni Putu Ayu Meylan; Dewi, Anak Agung Istri Ari Atu
SASI Volume 32 Issue 1, March 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v32i1.3668

Abstract

Introduction: Customary Village in Bali regulates the social and religious life of its community through customary law known as Awig-Awig. In Kesian Customary Village, Awig-Awig reflects the transformation of Hindu Dharma values into written normative rules intended to preserve social harmony and communal order. However, several provisions remain general and abstract, creating vage normen (vague norms) that generate normative ambiguity and potentially weaken legal certainty and the protection of the rights of krama Village, particularly in matters related to customary sanctions and inheritance.Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze the formulation of Hindu Dharma values within the Awig-Awig of Kesian Customary Village and to examine the juridical implications of these vague norms on the consistency of customary law enforcement and the protection of village community rights.Methods of the Research: This study employs normative legal research focusing on the ambiguity of Hindu Dharma values in written customary law. It applies statutory, conceptual, and philosophical approaches using primary legal materials such as the Awig-Awig of Kesian Customary Village and secondary materials including Hindu legal literature and customary law doctrines, which are analyzed through qualitative normative interpretation.Results of the Research: The findings show that Article 26 paragraph (3) and Article 49 contain vague norms due to the absence of clearly defined prohibited acts, determination procedures, and measurable sanctions. This ambiguity gives broad discretionary authority to customary leaders and risks inconsistent enforcement. The novelty of this research lies in providing a normative critique of Awig-Awig formulation from the perspective of legal certainty and recommending clearer legal standards to strengthen the protection of village community rights.
Co-Authors Anak Agung Istri Ari Atu Dewi Anggreni, Ni Made Gina Hardiyan, Salwa Putri Kadek Agus Sudiarawan Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan Wacika, Made Wiswani