Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Penyuluhan Hukum Tentang Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Ulayat Melalui Jalur Non Litigasi Di Kampung Nolokla Distrik Sentani Timur Kabupaten Jayapura James Yoseph Palenewen; Daniel Tanati; Yustus Pondayar; Frans Reumi; Eddy Pelupessy; Melkias Hetharia; Marthinus Solossa; Marthinus Mambaya; Farida Kaplele; Sara Ida Magdalena Awi; Karel V. H. Baransano; Margaretha G. M. I. Mamoribo; Dahliana Ketaren; Budiyanto; Dian Rahadian; Decky D. A. Wospakrik; Nur Asmarani; Hotlarisda Girsang; Thresia Hilda M. Y. Krey
AMMA : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 4 No. 8 : September (2025): AMMA : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : CV. Multi Kreasi Media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This community service is carried out with the title Legal Counseling on the Settlement of Customary Land Disputes Through Non-Litigation Paths in Nolokla Village, East Sentani District, Jayapura Regency, this activity is carried out to partners due to cases from partners regarding misunderstanding regarding the settlement of customary land disputes based on applicable laws and regulations in order to obtain legal certainty and where the disputing parties do not want to give in or want to win alone so that with the expertise possessed by the servant can carry out legal counseling so that the disputing parties both win or win-win solution. The method of implementing this community service is carried out through lectures and discussions held on Saturday, May 31, 2025 which was held in Nolokla Village, East Sentani District, Jayapura Regency by providing knowledge to partners regarding the resolution of land disputes in general there are two types, namely dispute resolution through Litigation and Non-Litigation to obtain legal certainty, this activity begins with preparation and coordination, then presentation of material on how to resolve customary land disputes based on applicable laws and regulations. The output of this service is to provide partners with an understanding of how to resolve disputes through non-litigation channels along with the advantages and disadvantages of resolving such disputes and also provide legal assistance to partners to resolve cases related to customary land disputes.
Penyuluhan Hukum Peraturan Daerah Khusus Provinsi Papua Nomor 23 Tahun 2008 Tentang Hak Ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dan Hak Perorangan Warga Masyarakat Hukum Adat Atas Tanah Di Kampung Asei Besar Distrik Sentani Timur Kabupaten Jayapura Sella Petrix Pelupessy; Berd Elkiopas Pelupessy; Y. D. W. Susi Irianti; Eddy Pelupessy; Marthinus Solossa; Nur Asmarani; James Yoseph Palenewen; Lena Claudia Angwarmasse; Evi Selviani; Vivilia Agnata Mudi; Dwight Nusawakan; Firman
AMMA : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 4 No. 9 : Oktober (2025): AMMA : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : CV. Multi Kreasi Media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This community service was carried out with the title of Legal Counseling on the Special Regional Regulation of Papua Province Number 23 of 2008 Concerning the Customary Rights of Customary Law Communities and the Individual Rights of Customary Law Community Members to Land in Asei Besar Village, East Sentani District, Jayapura Regency, this activity was carried out for partners due to cases from partners regarding their lack of understanding regarding the resolution of customary land disputes based on applicable laws and regulations in order to obtain legal certainty and where the disputing parties do not want to give in or want to win alone so that with the expertise possessed by the servants, they can carry out legal counseling so that the disputing parties both win or achieve a win-win solution. The method of implementing this community service is carried out through lectures and discussions held on Saturday, August 30, 2025, which was held in Asei Besar Village, East Sentani District, Jayapura Regency by providing knowledge to partners regarding land dispute resolution in general there are two types, namely dispute resolution through Litigation and Non-Litigation to obtain legal certainty, this activity begins with preparation and coordination, then presentation of material on how to resolve customary land disputes based on applicable laws and regulations. The output of this community service is to provide an understanding to partners about how to resolve disputes through Non-Litigation channels along with the advantages and disadvantages of resolving these disputes and also provide legal assistance to partners to resolve cases related to customary land disputes.
PELAKSANAAN PEMBERIAN DANA HIBAH KEPADA KOPERASI DAN PELAKU USAHA KECIL MENENGAH DI KOTA JAYAPURA Sella Petrix Pelupessy; Berd Elkiopas Pelupessy; Eddy Pelupessy
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 06 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i06.2098

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor apa saja yang mempengaruhi pelaksanaan pemberian dana hibah kepada koperasi dan pelaku usaha kecil menengah di Kota Jayapura. Metode Penelitian yuridis normatif dengan mengutamakan data sekunder yang bersumber dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier, serta pendekatan perundang-undangan, konsep, analisis dan sejarah hukum. Data yang diperoleh diolah dengan teknik analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa pelaksanaan pemberian dana hibah kepada koperasi dan pelaku usaha kecil menengah pada Pemerintah Kota Jayapura secara umum yang dimulai dari proses penganggaran, pelaksanaan dan penatausahaan, pertanggungjawaban dan pelaporan serta monitoring dan evaluasi telah sesuai dengan ketentuan dan peraturan yang berlaku, meskipun masih terdapat beberapa masalah-masalah tertentu namun tetap berjalan dengan efektif. Faktor-faktor yang menjadi kendala dalam pelaksanaan pemberian hibah dan bantuan sosial pada Pemerintah Kota Jayapura adalah : 1) Anggaran yang tersedia untuk dana hibah belum bisa mencukupi semua proposal/usulan yang diajukan oleh pemohon pada tahun anggaran bersangkutan; 2) Kondisi SDM yang ada pada saat ini secara umum masih terbatas jumlahnya khususnya yang memiliki skill sesuai kebutuhan, sehingga penerapan “the right man on the right place” belum sepenuhnya dapat dilaksanakan; 3) Kondisi sarana dan prasarana pendukung pelaksanaan program dan kegiatan pada Pemerintah Kota Jayapura secara umum masih kurang memadai baik dari segi kualitas maupun kuantitas; 4) Pengolahan data masih dilakukan secara manual sehingga menyulitkan pemerintah melakukan verifikasi secara selektif terhadap proposal/usulan yang diajukan dan 5) Animo dari masyarakat untuk mendapatkan bantuan dari pemerintah daerah, hal ini mengakibatkan proposal/usulan yang diajukan setiap tahunnya sangat banyak padahal bantuan yang diberikan hanya bersifat stimulan dalam rangka menggali potensi swadaya dan kemandirian masyarakat.
Indonesia's Dispute Against the European Union Related to The Nickel Ore Export: WTO Case Analysis Dinar Al Qadri; Suarni Sonda; Muhammad Fadly Saleh; Eddy Pelupessy; Thresia Hilda Mathelda Yenkase
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025): June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v20i1.18321

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the basis of the World Trade Organization (WTO) decision in favor of the European Union over Indonesia in the case of a ban on nickel ore exports by the Government of Indonesia and the appeal efforts that can be taken by the Indonesian government against the decision. This study uses normative legal research methods with conceptual and statutory approaches. The results of the study show that the basis of the WTO ruling in favor of the European Union over Indonesia in the case of the Indonesian Government's Nickel Seed Export Ban is that the Nickel Processing and Refining policy in Indonesia is proven to violate the provisions of WTO Article XI.1 GATT 1994 and cannot be justified by Articles XI.2 (a) and XX (d) GATT 1994. Indonesia is also deemed to be conducting a prohibited subsidy scheme under Subsidy and Countervailing Measures Agreement Article 3.1 through Minister of Finance Regulation (PMK) No. 76 Year 2012. The appeal has been taken by the Indonesian government officially in December 2022 and is still waiting for the formation of the WTO Appellate Body. Indonesia has a great opportunity to win a dispute at the WTO if Indonesia can prove the existence of national laws governing international trade, especially in the mining sector.
Legal Aspects of Determination of Tax Collection on Land and Building Rights Acquisition in Jayapura Regency Eddy Pelupessy
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.6617

Abstract

This study aims to examine the implementation of the collection of Land and Building Acquisition Tax in Jayapura Regency. To examine the obstacles that arise in the implementation of the collection of Land and Building Acquisition Tax in Jayapura Regency. The research method is sociological juridical, namely a legal research approach that examines law not only as a formal rule, but also as a social phenomenon that has an influence and is influenced by society. This approach uses qualitative research methods, such as interviews and observations, to understand how the law is applied and how society interacts with the law. The results of this study reveal that the implementation of the collection of Land and Building Acquisition Tax in Jayapura Regency is when there is a transfer of land and building rights due to a sale and purchase with a transaction value lower than the market price, the transaction value will be determined by DPPKAD officers based on the market price and a survey of the relevant taxable object, whereas the provisions of Article 87 paragraph 2 of Law Number 28 of 2009 and Article 7 of Jayapura Regency Regional Regulation Number 2 of 2011 state that the basis for imposing BPHTB tax on the acquisition of sale and purchase rights with a transaction value lower than the market price, then the basis for imposing BPHTB tax is the Taxable Object Sales Value (NJOP) of Land and Building Tax.