Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IJEBD (International Journal Of Entrepreneurship And Business Development) Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (Japendi)
Hadamean, Join
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kewenangan Konstitusional Pemerintah dalam Pelaksanaan Proyek Strategis Nasional Hadamean, Join; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono; Sami’an, Sami’an; Noor, Ganis Vitayanty
Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 12 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/japendi.v6i12.9065

Abstract

PSN merupakan instrumen percepatan pembangunan yang diatur melalui berbagai regulasi, termasuk UUD 1945, UU Pemerintahan Daerah, serta Peraturan Presiden tentang PSN. Namun, perlu ditinjau sejauh mana kewenangan konstitusional pemerintah dapat digunakan tanpa melampaui prinsip checks and balances. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kewenangan konstitusional Pemerintah dalam pelaksanaan Proyek Strategis Nasional (PSN) dengan meninjau dasar hukum, cakupan kewenangan eksekutif, serta implikasinya terhadap tata kelola pembangunan nasional. Penelitian menggunakan metode studi kepustakaan melalui analisis konstitusi, peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, serta literatur akademik terkait kewenangan eksekutif dan hukum administrasi. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa pemerintah memiliki legitimasi konstitusional untuk menjalankan PSN berdasarkan fungsi eksekutif dan mandat pembangunan nasional. Namun, kewenangan tersebut dibatasi oleh prinsip otonomi daerah, akuntabilitas publik, dan pengawasan yudisial. Pelaksanaan PSN efektif ketika didukung koordinasi lintas lembaga dan penegakan prinsip good governance. Namun, potensi konflik kewenangan, sentralisasi keputusan, dan kurangnya partisipasi publik dapat menimbulkan persoalan implementatif. Studi ini menegaskan pentingnya harmonisasi kewenangan pusat-daerah, transparansi prosedural, serta penguatan mekanisme pengawasan agar pelaksanaan PSN tetap sejalan dengan prinsip negara hukum.
Application of the Principles of Good Faith and Pacta Sunt Servanda in Unequal Construction Contracts: A Case Study of B2B Developer–Contractor Setijanto, Augustinus; Permatasari, Corina; Artahana, Nana; Hadamean, Join; Alam, Peto Syamsul; Koeswanto, Arief; Anggoro, Prastiwo; Prihatinah, Tri Lisiani
IJEBD (International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development) Vol 9 No 1 (2026): Jan - Feb 2026
Publisher : LPPM of NAROTAMA UNIVERSITY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29138/ijebd.v9i1.3494

Abstract

The legal relationship between developers and contractors in business-to-business (B2B) construction contracts in Indonesia often shows a significant imbalance of power. Although formally the contract is made based on the principle of freedom of contract, substantively the legal relationship often deviates from the principles of fairness and balance that form the basis of contract law. This paper examines the application of two fundamental principles in contract law, namely good faith and pacta sunt servanda, which means that every agreement made legally is binding on the parties who made it (Article 1338 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code) in the practice of biased construction contracts, particularly when developers modify FIDIC standard contracts by removing or limiting clauses that are detrimental to their interests, such as the Dispute Avoidance/Adjudication Board (DAAB), the right to an extension of time (EoT), and the right to suspend payment. This study uses a normative-juridical approach with case and comparative analysis methods, examining actual practices between developers and contractors experiencing delays, variation orders, and payment delays. The results of the analysis show that the removal of these protective mechanisms not only creates the potential for structural default but also constitutes a violation of the principle of good faith in the implementation of contracts as stipulated in Article 1338 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code. Meanwhile, the pacta sunt servanda principle cannot be applied absolutely if the substance of the contract contains a striking imbalance and violates propriety (Article 1339 of the Civil Code). This paper offers an update in the form of a reinterpretation of the principle of good faith as a corrective instrument against exploitative clauses, as well as a proposal for the establishment of a national DAAB institution with proportional costs to uphold contractual justice. Thus, the application of contract law in construction contracts must be directed towards substantive balance and a fair relational relationship between developers and contractors, so that national development objectives can be achieved without causing protracted disputes.
Co-Authors Alam, Peto Syamsul Anggoro, Prastiwo Artahana, Nana Ganis Vitayanty Noor Koeswanto, Arief Permatasari, Corina Sami’an, Sami’an Sarwono Hardjomuljadi Setijanto, Augustinus Tri Lisiani Prihatinah