Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Referendum
Galuh Candra Utami
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pembuktian Digital dalam Sengketa Perdata: Menguji Validitas Formil dan Materiil Dokumen Elektronik di Era Modern Galuh Candra Utami; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i4.1360

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has fundamentally transformed civil legal interactions, making electronic documents such as instant messages, online transactions, and digital contracts primary forms of evidence in many civil disputes. However, their admissibility in judicial proceedings remains fraught with challenges concerning formal and material validity. This study aims to identify juridical and technical obstacles in digital evidence and to formulate an ideal model for civil procedural law that ensures reliable electronic proof. A normative-juridical approach with qualitative analysis was employed, combining doctrinal research through legislative review, jurisprudence, and scholarly literature with case studies of court decisions involving electronic evidence, particularly in divorce disputes. The findings reveal that inconsistent judicial treatment stems from the absence of specific procedural rules in Indonesia’s civil procedure framework still rooted in colonial-era HIR and RBg alongside limited digital infrastructure and low technological literacy among judicial actors. In response, the study proposes an integrated legal construction model featuring explicit provisions in the upcoming Civil Procedure Code, adoption of the functional equivalence principle, institutionalization of digital forensic experts in litigation, and procedural safeguards for vulnerable parties. The research concludes that only through holistic reform of the evidentiary paradigm can Indonesia’s civil justice system guarantee fairness, legal certainty, and relevance in the digital era.
AKIBAT HUKUM PUTUSAN PEMBUBARAN PARTAI POLITIK DAN EKSKLUSIVITAS HAK PEMOHON OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 53/PUU-IX/2011 Pardamean Harahap; Mochamad Yulian Fadhli Saputra; Muhamad Noval Faris Pratama; Ahmad Jafar Sidik; Galuh Candra Utami; Talitha Kamilah; Claraditha Adelia Nelson; Zahra Ramadhanty Drajat; Asyifa Nayla Jingga
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 03 (2026): Volume 11 Nomor 03, September 2026 Publish
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i03.65151

Abstract

The dissolution of political parties is one of the Constitutional Court’s authorities to safeguard democracy, state ideology, and the integrity of the Republic of Indonesia. Constitutional Court Decision Number 53/PUU-IX/2011 affirms that the Government is the only party with legal standing to petition for the dissolution of a political party. This study aims to analyze the juridical implications of such exclusivity and the legal consequences arising from a dissolution decision. This research employs a normative legal method through statutory, case, and literature approaches. The results show that limiting legal standing is intended to maintain national stability, but it also restricts citizens’ participation in monitoring political parties. Furthermore, the dissolution of a political party results in the revocation of its legal entity status, termination of its activities, state acquisition of its assets, and restrictions on certain political rights of its officials. Therefore, strengthening legal mechanisms is necessary to ensure legal certainty and uphold constitutional democracy.
Co-Authors Ahmad Jafar Sidik Asyifa Nayla Jingga Claraditha Adelia Nelson Mochamad Yulian Fadhli Saputra Muhamad Noval Faris Pratama Pardamean Harahap Talitha Kamilah Wiraguna, Sidi Ahyar Zahra Ramadhanty Drajat