Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Kasta: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan
Mukhtar
Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kekosongan Hukum dalam Perlindungan Konsumen pada Lembaga Keuangan Syariah: Tinjauan Kritis terhadap Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999 Muhammad Kandriana; Muhammad Rifaid; Muhammad Wildan; Mukhtar; Iksan
UNES Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/stjsnk61

Abstract

Kekosongan hukum dalam perlindungan konsumen pada lembaga keuangan syariah menimbulkan berbagai permasalahan terkait kejelasan aturan dan pelaksanaan perlindungan bagi nasabah. Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis dan mengidentifikasi bentuk kekosongan hukum dalam Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999 yang belum sepenuhnya mengakomodasi kebutuhan perlindungan konsumen di lembaga keuangan syariah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan analisis peraturan perundang-undangan terkait dan studi literatur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat celah pengaturan yang dapat mengakibatkan lemahnya mekanisme perlindungan konsumen, khususnya terkait produk dan akad syariah yang belum diatur spesifik dalam Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999. Kesimpulannya, diperlukan revisi atau pembentukan aturan khusus guna menjamin perlindungan konsumen yang adil dan berkeadilan sesuai dengan nilai-nilai syariah dan kebutuhan transaksi keuangan kontemporer.
The Role of Religious Courts in Resolving Inheritance Disputes Through Judicial Legal Reasoning: An Analysis of 2024 Court Decisions Mukhtar; Zuhrah; Mastorat
KASTA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Lembaga Bale Literasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/kasta.v5i2.4295

Abstract

Inheritance disputes remain one of the most frequently litigated civil cases before Religious Courts in Indonesia, reflecting the complexity of legal relationships among heirs as well as differences in interpreting Islamic inheritance law. Although the Religious Court possesses absolute jurisdiction over inheritance disputes involving Muslims, variations in judicial legal reasoning continue to influence the consistency and quality of judicial decisions. This study aims to analyze the role of the Religious Court in resolving inheritance disputes and examine the legal considerations employed by judges in inheritance cases adjudicated in 2024. The research adopts an empirical juridical approach using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary data were obtained through interviews and analysis of court decisions, while secondary data were collected from legislation, legal literature, and scholarly publications concerning inheritance law and judicial authority. The findings indicate that the Religious Court performs not only an adjudicative function but also serves as an institution promoting legal certainty, justice, and societal benefit through comprehensive judicial reasoning. Judicial decisions demonstrate that judges integrate statutory provisions, Islamic legal principles, jurisprudence, and sociological considerations to achieve substantive justice. This study contributes to the development of inheritance law by proposing a comprehensive model of judicial reasoning that strengthens consistency in inheritance dispute resolution within Indonesia's Religious Court system.
Co-Authors Iksan Mastorat Muhammad Kandriana Muhammad Rifaid Muhammad Wildan Zuhrah