Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Jurnal Investasi Islam
Dewi Sulastri
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Position and Authority of the Ombudsman in the Government Administration Supervision System: Synergy and Tension with the Authority of the PTUN Mutiara Jihan Aziza; Dewi Sulastri
al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i2.3394

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the position and authority of the Ombudsman in the government administration supervision system and examine its functional relationship with the State Administrative Court, especially in the context of synergy and tension of authority. This research uses normative juridical methods with a legislative, conceptual, and case approach. The data used is in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials that are analyzed qualitatively through descriptive-analytical methods with deductive reasoning. The research results show that the Ombudsman and the State Administrative Court have different but complementary authority characters, where the Ombudsman acts as a preventive and corrective non-judicial supervisor, while the State Administrative Court acts as a repressive judicial institution and provides legal certainty. On the one hand, there is a potential for synergy between the two in strengthening the administrative supervision system through a tiered and mutually supportive dispute resolution mechanism. But on the other hand, there is tension in authority caused by paradigm differences, legal force, and the absence of a clear coordination mechanism, which implies legal uncertainty and the effectiveness of supervision. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen institutional regulation and coordination to optimize the relationship between the two institutions in realizing an accountable and fair government.
Brand Differentiation and Digital Marketplace Innovation under Trademark Law: Insights from Indonesia’s Law No. 20 of 2016 Dewi Sulastri; Neng Yani Nurhayani
Jurnal Investasi Islam Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Investasi Islam (JII)
Publisher : FEBI IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/cg1az384

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between brand differentiation strategies, technological innovation in digital marketplaces, and trademark protection under Indonesia’s Law No. 20 of 2016. Using a qualitative empirical–juridical approach, the research draws on semi-structured interviews with intellectual property officials, business actors, and marketplace stakeholders, complemented by document analysis and case studies. The findings indicate that global market competition and digitalisation encourage firms to strengthen brand differentiation through digital ecosystems, data-driven marketing, and platform technologies such as AI and blockchain. However, regulatory fragmentation, cross-border enforcement challenges, and limited intellectual property awareness among MSMEs hinder effective trademark protection. The study contributes to the literature by highlighting the emerging implications of immersive technologies (VR, AR, XR, and metaverse environments) for trademark protection and proposing an adaptive regulatory framework that integrates state regulation, platform governance, and business innovation.
Co-Authors Mutiara Jihan Aziza Neng Yani Nurhayani