cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Akta
Published by Universitas Islam Sultan Agung
ISSN : 24069426     EISSN : 25812114     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
JURNAL AKTA (eISSN : 2581-2114, pISSN: 2406-9426) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Master Program (S2) Notary, Faculty of Law, Sultan Agung Islmic University. JURNAL AKTA published four times a year in March, June, September and December. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. This journal has been acredited
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 818 Documents
 32   33   34   35   36 
The Legal Impact Of The Land Deed Official Whose Position Is Different From The Place Of Domicile As A Notary Ardila Taha Taha; Umar Ma’ruf; Widhi Handoko
Jurnal Akta Vol 7, No 1 (2020): March 2020
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v7i1.7875

Abstract

The objectives of this study are: 1) To find out and explain the legal impact of the Land Deed Official whose position is different from the place of domicile as a Notary. 2) To find out the actions and steps that can be taken if in practice a Notary / PPAT gets a different position area. The method of approach used in this study is the Normative juridical approach. Retrieval of data with a library approach. The analysis was carried out qualitatively.Based on the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that: 1) Notary who has been appointed in an office whose position is different from his area of office as a PPAT is temporarily dismissed from his position for violating the obligations and prohibition of office. Regulations regarding this matter are expressly regulated in UUJN. The person concerned is no longer entitled to make a deed, meaning that he no longer has the authority to make any deed, so if he turns out to still make a deed, then the deed concerned only has the power of proof as a deed under the hand. Whereas the PPAT who is appointed in a position whose position is different from his position as a Notary, causing the PPAT in question automatically stops automatically as a PPAT and for that reason, no dismissal decision is needed. Regulations regarding this matter are explicitly regulated in Government regulation number 24 of 2016 on Government regulation number 38 of 1998 on PPAT Position Regulations. 2) Notary / PPAT Actions and Steps that deal with the problems mentioned above must immediately submit an application to the relevant agency (DEPKUMHAM/BPN) to be able to adjust the area of office. In the event that the formation for the area concerned is closed, the relevant person must wait until the formation for the area is opened. In order to continue to carry out his position concerned must choose his work area as a Notary or work area as PPAT. Regulations regarding this matter are explicitly regulated in Government regulation number 24 of 2016 on Government regulation number 38 of 1998 on PPAT Position Regulations.Keywords: Legal Impact; Land Deed Official; Position; Notary.
Juridical Analysis on Responsibility of Notaries Against Counterfeiting Description Existence in An Authentic Agreement Siska Dwi Astuti July; Khusen Martono; Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
Jurnal Akta Vol 5, No 3 (2018): September 2018
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v5i3.3254

Abstract

Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Act No. 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Office constitution that notaries are public officials, the authority to make the Act Authentic legitimate. Unfortunately in today's world that is filled by the desire of economic excess, not a few people on the mountain doing the wrong thing in order to enrich themselves, unfortunately including the notary who had exalted position in society as one of the authorities, instead of showing the action sublime them Authentic Act falsified. This study aims to clarify how the rule of law based on the positive law in Indonesia about such actions. Using normative juridical approach, and statutory approach, exploiting all the laws that have a correlation with the observed cases. To find practical application, researchers used the District Court of Semarang No. 676 / Pid.B /2017 PN.Smg The conclusion showed notary who forged authentic action violates the Notary Code and morally can not punish a criminal by Notary Code by the Board of Supervisors, but no conclusions about the case in the District Court ruling Semarang. While the notary may be punished criminally if proven wrong by article 264 of the Criminal Code no violation of law in Indonesia.Keywords: Notary; Authentic Agreement; Suspect.
Land Position In The Coastal Arising By Act No. 1 Of 2014 Concerning The Management Of Coastal Areas And Small Islands Deni Lesmana Andimiharja; Akhmad Khisni
Jurnal Akta Vol 6, No 1 (2019): March 2019
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v6i1.4246

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to know and understand the position of the land arose in the legal system of national land and to know and understand land management arise in the effort to reorganize the coastal areas pursuant to Act No. 27 of 2007. The data used in this study are primary data, secondary data, and the data to support tertiary study, then analyzed with descriptive analytical method.Based on the analysis concluded that the position of the land arises in national land law system is including state land. It is, as the land has not been adhered by something any rights that the state as the highest organization that was entrusted by the Constitution to master, setting, allocation, land use arise.Land management arises in the effort to reorganize the region coastal areas in an integrated manner, in a sustainable spatial planning through the stages of structuring and planning, formulation, implementation, and evaluation by considering the legislation concerned. Keywords : Land Arise; Coastal Areas; Small Islands
Penyimpangan Hukum Dalam Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Rifka Annisa Apriana; Jawade Hafidz
Jurnal Akta Vol 4, No 4 (2017): December 2017
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v4i4.2521

Abstract

AbstractThe establishment of a limited liability company has own terms set forth in the law number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, however, when a person will establish a limited liability company, there are some who deviate from a law which is established one of which is the requirement of establishment PT is done by (2) two or more persons, but in the Law of the PT is not stipulated clearly about the requirement of being a shareholder so that in practice there is often a deviation in which the nominee shareholder is used. The nominee agreement as a shareholder in the PT is an agreement and/or statement confirming that the ownership of shares in the limited liability company is for and on behalf of others. There is no law on PT provisions regarding the use of nominee shareholders so that it can trigger a legal issue if the nominee shareholder is not good enough.Keywords: Company Irregularities, PT establishment requirements are made by two or more persons, Nominee Agreement AbstrakPendirian perseroan terbatas mempunyai syarat tersendiri yang sudah diatur di dalam undang-undang nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas, akan tetapi, ketika seseorang akan mendirikan sebuah perseroan terbatas, ada beberapa yang melakukan penyimpangan dari undang-undang yang terlah ditetapkan salah satunya adalah syarat pendirian PT dilakukan oleh (2) dua orang atau lebih, Namun dalam UU PT tidak diatur secara jelas mengenai syarat menjadi pemegang saham sehingga dalam pelaksanaannya sering terjadi penyimpangan dimana digunakannya pemegang saham nominee. Perjanjian nominee sebagai pemegang saham dalam PT merupakan perjanjian dan atau pernyataan yang menegaskan bahwa kepemilikan saham dalam perseroan terbatas tersebut untuk dan atas nama orang lain. UU PT tidak ada mengatur mengenai ketentuan penggunaan pemegang saham nominee sehingga dapat memicu timbulnya permasalahan hukum apabila pemegang saham nominee tersebut beritikad tidak baik.Kata Kunci: Penyimpangan Perseroan Terbatas, syarat pendirian PT dilakukan oleh (2) dua orang atau lebih, Perjanjian Nominee
Analysis of Judicial Application of Criminal Penalty Against Notary / Land Deed Officials Conducting Making Crime of the Fake Authentic Deed in State Court of Semarang Mohammad Barkah Arrohim; Haris Wahyu Sunarno; Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
Jurnal Akta Vol 7, No 2 (2020): June 2020
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v7i2.7891

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to: 1) analyze the application of criminal penalty against Notary / PPAT in the crime of counterfeiting deed on the Case In State Court of Semarang. 2) Analyze the legal consequences of the Notary / PPAT penalized following criminal of fake deed as object case in court on a lawsuit in State Court of Semarang. The approach in this research is normative juridical that while the data used in this research primary data, secondary data and data that can support tertiary study, which was then analyzed by descriptive analytical method.Based on the results of data analysis concluded that: 1) The application of criminal law to the Notary / PPAT in the crime of falsification of the authentic deed in case Criminal judges are viewed from the indictment, formally defendant has fulfilled the elements formulation in forgery and materially to hear and see information from the defendant, the witnesses and the evidence presented in the trial and have sufficient minimum of two (2) valid evidence, the defendant was found guilty and convincingly to have committed the crime of falsification of the authentic Article 264 of the criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 (1) e of the criminal Code that is alleged to defendant ,2) The legal consequences of the Notary / PPAT sanctioned criminal in the crime of counterfeiting authentic deed along with the deed that made the object of a case in court on the case Criminal defendant Notary / PPAT sentenced to prison with a prison sentence and All certificates issued by the defendant Notary / PPAT canceled in favor law.Keywords: Criminal Penalty; Notary / PPAT; Authentic Deed.
Akibat Hukum Terhadap Peralihan Hak Milik Atas Tanah Yang Belum Lunas Pembayarannya M. Adib Luthfi; Akhmad Khisni
Jurnal Akta Vol 5, No 1 (2018): March 2018
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v5i1.2532

Abstract

ABSTRAKHasil penelitian menyimpulkan, bahewa akibat hukum dari peralihan hak milik atas tanah yang belum lunas pembayarannya adalah sah secara jual beli, akan tetapi apabila pembayaran harga tanahnya tersebut belum dilunasi terlebih dahulu maka peralihan hak nya dapat ditangguhkan (sesuai perjanjian pengikatan jual beli lunas). Setelah pembayaran harganya dilunasi baru proses peralihan haknya dilanjutkan (pembuatan Akta Jual Beli dan proses sertifikat). PPAT membuatkan Akta Jual Beli selanjutnya akta tersebut dijadikan alat bukti autentik yang menerangkan telah terjadi peralihan hak atas tanah melalui jual beli selanjutnya untuk didaftarkan. Sedangkan jual beli tanah yang menganut hukum adat bersifat konkret, kontan, nyata dan riil. Artinya peran PPAT dalam melaksanakan amanat Undang-Undang tersebut harus benar-benar terlaksana dan kaitannya dengan peralihan hak milik atas tanah yang belum lunas pembayarannya, PPAT harus menentukan sikap tegas untuk tidak membuatkan Akta Jual Beli tersebut sebelum seluruh pembayaran harganya lunas meskipun cara pembayarannya secara bertahap. Solusinya apabila ada permasalahan seperti itu maka PPAT harus membuatkan perjanjian pengikatan jual beli lunas sebelum dibuatkan Akta Jual Belinya. Hal tersebut dilakukan supaya terwujud rasa keadilan dan meminimalisir wanprestasi antara penjual dan pembeli dalam kaitannya dengan jual beli tanah.Kata Kunci : Akibat Hukum, Jual Beli Tanah, Belum Lunas. ABSTRACT The result of this study concludes that the legal effect of the transfer of ownership of land that has not paid off is valid for the sale and purchase, but if the payment of the land price has not been paid in advance then the transfer of its rights can be suspended (in accordance with the agreement of sale and purchase settlement paid). After payment of the price is paid a new process of transfer of rights continue (making Deed of Sale and Purchase certificate process). PPAT makes the Deed of Sale and then the deed is used as authentic proof that there has been a transfer of land rights through subsequent sale and sale to be registered. While the sale and purchase of land that adheres to customary law is concrete, cash, real and real. This means that the role of PPAT in carrying out the mandate of the Act must be fully implemented and related to the transfer of ownership rights to land that has not paid off, PPAT must determine the firm stance to not make the Deed and Sell before all payment of the price paid in full even though the payment method gradually . The solution if there are problems like that then PPAT must make a binding agreement to buy and sell paid before the Deed of Sale. This is done in order to realize the sense of justice and minimize the default between the seller and the buyer in relation to the sale and purchase of land.Keywords: Legal Effect, Sale and Purchase Land, Not Filled.
Kepastian Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Timbulnya Tumpang Tindih Sertifikat Hak Milik (SHM) Atas Tanah (Studi Kasus Di Kantor Pertanahan/Agraria Dan Tata Ruang Kota Pontianak) Lia Malini Sari; Lathifah Hanim
Jurnal Akta Vol 4, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v4i1.1552

Abstract

Apabila ada tanah yang tidak digunakan secara efektif (oneffectief gebruik) atau ditelantarkan oleh pemiliknya, maka tanah itu akan dikuasai oleh negara. Tujuan pokok dari UUPA tidak hanya untuk memberikan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum mengenai kepemilikan hak atas tanah bagi rakyat, tetapi UUPA juga mengatur mengenai macam-macam hak atas tanah yang dapat diberikan dan dipunyai oleh perseorangan, baik sendiri maupun bersama-sama dengan orang lain ataupun badan hukum.Terkait pemberian kepastian dan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang sah hak atas tanah yang sudah mendaftarkan tanah haknya, sebagai tanda bukti hak diterbitkan sertipikat yang merupakan salinan register.Penelitian ini berkaitan dengan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Timbulnya Tumpang Tindih Sertifikat Hak Milik (SHM) Atas Tanah (Studi Kasus Di Kantor Pertanahan/Agraria Dan Tata Ruang Kota Pontianak). Dengan metode penelitan yang menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis/normatif dan kepustakaan, ditunjang dengan pendekatan sosio-legal.Penelitian ini bertujuan: 1) untuk menemukan dan menganalisa bentuk kepastian hukum bagi pemegang sah hak atas tanah yang sudah memiliki alat bukti (sertifikat), 2) mengungkapkan dan menganalisis bagaimana penyelesaian sengketa  dan 3) mengungkap dan menganalisis bagaimana akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan sengketa tumpang tindih Sertifikat Hak Milik (SHM).Upaya penanganan dan penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Pontianak tidaklah mudah untuk proses penyelesaiannya karena ada kendala-kendala yang dihadapi. Untuk membuktikan sahnya kepemilikan sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah yang telah dikeluarkan oleh Kantor Pertanahan Kota Pontianak, Kantor Pertanahan Kota Pontianak tidak mempunyai kewenangan dalam melakukan uji materil dan meneliti kebenaran dalam sertipikat tersebut. Pihak yang mempunyai kewenangan untuk membuktikannya adalah pihak pengadilan dalam hal ini Hakim berdasarkan proses peradilan.Solusi dari penyelesaian sengketa tanah tersebut diupayakan melalui mediasi atau non litigasi, akan tetapi apabila ada masing-masing pihak bersikukuh pada pendiriannya, maka untuk mendapatkan kepastian hukumannya, wajib dilaksanakan penyelesaian sengketa secara litigasi melalui pengadilan yang sudah mendapat putusan dari pengadilan.Kata kunci : Kepastian hukum, Sengketa tanah
The Review Of Agricultural Land Transfer Related Juridical Absentee That Made Before PPAT Heris Ramadan; Sumaryono Sumaryono
Jurnal Akta Vol 7, No 2 (2020): June 2020
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v7i2.8102

Abstract

The purpose of this study as follows 1) To identify and explain the transfer of agricultural land Absentee made before PPAT. 2) To identify and explain the barriers and solutions Absentee transfer of agricultural land made before PPAT. The method used by researchers is sociological approach juridical law and specification in this study were included descriptive analysis. The source and type of data in this study are primary data obtained from field studies with interview, and secondary data obtained from the study of literature. Based on the results of the research are Strict monitoring of the transfer of agricultural land through cooperation between the relevant agencies, namely the Village Head, District and PPAT / Notary. Barriers: a) Lack of public awareness, b) Since the Inheritance Land where many families who left their land to her son while her son stayed in town and have settled the town even had a decent job in the city than in the rural location of his land, it is also one causes of land ownership is due to inheritance. c) Land Office did not have accurate data on their ownership of agricultural land by Absentee. Solution: Perform legal counseling for the creation of legal order are carried out continuously to the community and local authorities with regard to land issues.Keywords: Judicial Review; Diversion; Farmland; Absentee; PPAT
Effects The Constitutional Court Decision Allowing Marriage Agreement After Marriage (Constitutional Court Decision No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015) Kevin Hanif Hakim; Akhmad Khisni
Jurnal Akta Vol 6, No 2 (2019): June 2019
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v6i2.5020

Abstract

At first the marriage law stipulated in the Civil Law Act (Civil Code) and subsequent regulations related to marriage and even then dealt with separately by Act No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage. On October 27 2016 the Constitutional Court (MK) through its Decision No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 gives constitutional interpretation of Article 29 of Act No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage which basically says that the marriage contract can be carried out during the marriage bond. Therefore, the object of the author's thesis writing is a result of the law of the Constitutional Court decision that allows marriage after marriage. And the formulation of the problem in this paper are the implications of the procedure / mechanism of making the marriage contract and the legal consequences of the status of the property as well as third parties who feel aggrieved over the agreement. Methods used by the authors te is normative research method. So as to obtain results that due to the Constitutional Court's decision that allows the marriage contract after marriage alter the legal mechanism of making the marriage contract that can now be created during the marriage bond takes place by the Notary without preceded by the determination of the competent court and the legal consequences of making the marriage contract after the wedding on the status of property together with the inherent (closely related) to the time of entry into force of the agreement and binding on third parties.Keywords: Notary; Marriage Agreement; the Constitutional Court Decision
Alasan Pembuatasan Dan Perubahan Ketentuan Terkait Modal Dalam Perseroan Terbatas Eka Purnamasari; Miftah Anshori; Gunarto Gunarto
Jurnal Akta Vol 5, No 1 (2018): March 2018
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v5i1.2549

Abstract

AbstrakModal merupakan faktor yang sangat penting, sebagai salah satu sarana untuk meraih keuntungan dalam kegiatan usaha, juga bagi eksitensi kelangsungan kehidupan maupun pengembangan perseroan terbatas sebagai organisasi ekonomi. Adapun Struktur modal seperti yang ditegaskan dalam Penjelasan Pasal 41 ayat (1) UUPT 2007, bahwa yang dimaksud dengan modal perseroan adalah modal dasar, ditempatkan, modal disetor. Dalam Pasal 32 ayat (1) UUPT 2007 terdapat pengaturan mengenai batas mininal dari modal dasar perseroan yaitu paling sedikit Rp 50.000.000,00 (lima puluh juta rupiah) kurang dari jumlah tersebut tidak diperbolehkan. Untuk modal ditempatkan juga ada batas minimal yang dicantumkan dalam Pasal 33 ayat (1) UUPT 2007, yaitu paling sedikit 25% (dua puluh lima persen) dari modal dasar, harus ditempatkan. Kemudian untuk modal disetor berdasarkan Pasal 33 ayat (1) UUPT 2007 dihubungkan dengan ketentuan Pasal 33 ayat (3) UUPT 2007 dan penjelasannya harus disetor penuh, maksudnya adalah jika modal ditempatkan 50% dari modal dasar, maka modal yang harus disetor penuh 50% dan tidak dapat diangsur. Tetapi, pada Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 29 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Modal Dasar Perseroan Terbatas ditentukan lain terkait modal dasar Perseroan Terbatas, yaitu modal dasar tersebut dikembalikan ke kesepakatan Para pendiri Perseroan Terbatas. Dari sekilas penjelasan diatas kita dapat melihat bahwa apabila kita ingin mendirikan sebuah Perseroan Terbatas ada pengaturan yang terkait mengenai batas minimal dari modal dalam peseroan terbatas, masalahnya adalah apakah alasan pembuatan dan perubahan ketentuan tentang modal Perseroan Terbatas?Kata Kunci : Modal, Perseroan Terbatas, Pengaturan. AbstractCapital is a very important factor, because one means to gain profit in business activities, also for the survival and development of a limited liability company as an economic organization. Capital structure as referred to in Elucidation of Article 41 paragraph (1) law number 49 of 2007 on limited liability company, company capital is the authorized capital, issued capital and paid up capital. In Article 32 Paragraph (1) of the Limited Liability Company Act of 2007 there is a regulation concerning the minimum limit of authorized capital of a company of at least Rp 50,000,000.00 (fifty million rupiah), less than the amount that is not permitted. For the issued capital there is also a minimum limit specified in Article 33 paragraph (1) UUPT 2007 which is at least 25% (twenty five percent) of the authorized capital. Furthermore, the paid up capital under Article 33 paragraph (1) of the Limited Liability Company Act of 2007 relates to the provisions of Article 33 paragraph (3) of the Limited Liability Company Law in 2007 and the explanation shall be paid, that is, if the capital is placed 50% of the authorized capital, must be paid in full 50% and can not be paid in installments. However, the government regulation number 29 of 2016 on changes in the authorized capital of a limited liability company is determined in relation to the authorized capital of a limited liability company, namely the athorized capital is returned to the agreement of the founders of the limited liability company. From the description above we can see that if we want to establish a Limited Liability Company there is a related regulation concerning the minimum limit of capital in a limited liability company, the problem is the reason why arrangements are made and needed in the Limited Liability Company?Keyword : Capital, Limited Liability company, arrangements.

Page 34 of 82 | Total Record : 818

 32   33   34   35   36 

Filter by Year

2016 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13, No 1 (2026): March 2026 Vol 12, No 4 (2025): December 2025 Vol 12, No 3 (2025): September 2025 Vol 12, No 2 (2025): June 2025 Vol 12, No 1 (2025): March 2025 Vol 11, No 4 (2024): December 2024 Vol 11, No 3 (2024): September 2024 Vol 11, No 2 (2024): June 2024 Vol 11, No 1 (2024): March 2024 Vol 10, No 4 (2023): December 2023 Vol 10, No 3 (2023): September 2023 Vol 10, No 2 (2023): June 2023 Vol 10, No 1 (2023): March 2023 Vol 9, No 4 (2022): December 2022 Vol 9, No 3 (2022): September 2022 Vol 9, No 2 (2022): June 2022 Vol 9, No 1 (2022): March 2022 Vol 8, No 4 (2021): December 2021 Vol 8, No 3 (2021): September 2021 Vol 8, No 2 (2021): June 2021 Vol 8, No 1 (2021): March 2021 Vol 7, No 4 (2020): December 2020 Vol 7, No 3 (2020): September 2020 Vol 7, No 2 (2020): June 2020 Vol 7, No 1 (2020): March 2020 Vol 6, No 4 (2019): December 2019 Vol 6, No 3 (2019): September 2019 Vol 6, No 2 (2019): June 2019 Vol 6, No 1 (2019): March 2019 Vol 5, No 4 (2018): December 2018 Vol 5, No 3 (2018): September 2018 Vol 5, No 2 (2018): June 2018 Vol 5, No 1 (2018): March 2018 Vol 4, No 4 (2017): December 2017 Vol 4, No 3 (2017) Vol 4, No 2 (2017) Vol 4, No 1 (2017) Vol 3, No 4 (2016) More Issue