Jurnal Penelitian Politik
Jurnal Pusat Penelitian Politik-Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (P2Politik-LIPI) merupakan media pertukaran pemikiran mengenai masalah-masalah strategis yang terkait dengan bidang-bidang politik nasional, lokal, dan internasional; khususnya mencakup berba-gai tema seperti demokratisasi, pemilihan umum, konflik, otonomi daerah, pertahanan dan keamanan, politik luar negeri dan diplomasi, dunia Islam serta isu-isu lain yang memiliki arti strategis bagi bangsa dan negara Indonesia.
Articles
560 Documents
<![CDATA[EVALUASI ATAS PELAKSANAAN OTONOMI KHUSUS ACEH: GAGAL MENYEJAHTERAKAN RAKYAT DAN SARAT KONFLIK INTERNAL ]]>
<![CDATA[Heru Cahyono]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Politik Vol 9, No 2 (2012): Politik Aceh dalam Ujian? ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Penelitian Politik ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14203/jpp.v9i2.227
<![CDATA[Otonomi khusus Aceh diperoleh melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006, menindaklanjuti MoUHelsinki 2005 sebagai bentuk rekonsiliasi secara bermartabat menuju pembangunan sosial, ekonomi, dan politikdi Aceh secara berkelanjutan. Akan tetapi, setelah lebih dari enam tahun berlalu kita menyaksikan bagaimanapelaksanaan otonomi khusus kurang berjalan sesuai dengan harapan. Di bidang ekonomi kita menyaksikan, danaotonomi khusus tidak terkelola dengan baik sehingga membuat kesejahteraan masyarakat Aceh secara umum tidakmengalami perbaikan. Ironisnya, peningkatan kesejahteraan justru hanya dinikmati oleh segelintir orang yang dekatdengan lingkaran kekuasaan sehingga menimbulkan fenomena orang-orang kaya baru di sana. Di bidang politik,adanya partai lokal tidak mampu meredam potensi konflik yang ada, dan bahkan justru memicu konflik internalbaru antara sesama mantan GAM. Friksi tersebut semakin memperumit dinamika konflik di bumi Aceh. Kegagalan pelaksanaan kekhususan di kedua bidang itu, politik dan ekonomi, pada gilirannya akan mempersulit untukmengeluarkan Aceh dari “lingkaran setan” konflik sekaligus masalah kemiskinan di sana.Kata kunci: Otonomi khusus, kegagalan, politik, ekonomi.]]>
<![CDATA[Peta Kekuatan Politik Hasil Pemilu 2009 ]]>
<![CDATA[Lili Romli]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Politik Vol 6, No 1 (2009): Kisruh Pemilu 2009 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Penelitian Politik ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14203/jpp.v6i1.523
<![CDATA[The 2009 election has resulted a map ofpolitical change of the election winner The winner of the 2004 election was Golkar Party while in the 2009 election the winner was Democrat Party The 2009 election became a punishment for old parties like Golkar PDIP and PPP since their votes were decreasing sharply compare to previous election Meanwhile two new parties Gerindra and Hanura had successfully entered Senayan parliament by defeating previous parties that had existed in the parliament The Islamic Parties with their Islamic basis mass except PKS has failed to get electoral support due to their decreasing votes or did not pass the electoral threshold This also happened to nationalist parties and christian basis mass parties.]]>
<![CDATA[Review Buku : Menimbang Demokrasi Dua Dekade Reformasi ]]>
<![CDATA[Sutan Sorik]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Politik Vol 16, No 2 (2019): Evaluasi Pemilu Serentak 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Penelitian Politik ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14203/jpp.v16i2.836
<![CDATA[Tulisan ini mengulas buku yang ditulis oleh lima belas orang peneliti di Pusat Penelitian Politik Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (P2P LIPI) dengan editor Syamsuddin Haris, tentang menimbang demokrasi dua dekade reformasi. Ulasan berfokus pada empat hal, yaitu tentang reformasi menuju sistem demokrasi, reformasi sistem perwakilan, pemilu, dan kepartaian, reformasi sektor kemanan, reformasi hubungan pusat-daerah, desentralisasi, dan politik lokal.Kata kunci: Menimbang Demokrasi, Dua Dekade Reformasi]]>
<![CDATA[SIKAP PEMILIH TERHADAP PASANGAN CALON KEPALA DAERAH MENJELANG PILKADA LANGSUNG DI KOTA BITUNG ]]>
<![CDATA[Johny Lumolo]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Politik Vol 4, No 1 (2007): Demokrasi Mati Suri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Penelitian Politik ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14203/jpp.v4i1.445
<![CDATA[The purpose of General Election including in Local Government (Pemerintah Daerah) is to create a democratic government based on the principle of the people, by the people andfor the people. In so doing, the process of General Election must be colored by transparency and accountability principle. In line with this notion this research portray empirical condition surrounding Local Government General Election (Pemilihan Kepala Daerah) in Bitung Municipality in year 2004. As an explorative study, this research utilizes survey technique to draw respondents' opinion which will be presented in a descriptive analysis method. This research aims to analyze attitudes ofthe voters in determining their preferences, the reason of their decision and the influence ofmoney politics on the voters decision. This research confirms that most of the voters choose the candidates based on three main reasons as they know the candidates very well they believe in the candidates personal character figur and they have an ideological bond with the candidate However the effect of ideology is only apparent among PDI P voters as they consistently choose candidates from PDI P while others voters are likely to choose the candidates based on thefigur On the contrary with the common perception about effect ofmoney politics this research indicates that in this case money politics is less effective in influencing the voters decision to choose the candidates.]]>
<![CDATA[Kepemimpinan Donald Trump dan Turbulensi Tatanan Dunia ]]>
<![CDATA[Siswanto Siswanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Politik Vol 15, No 1 (2018): Turbulensi Kepemimpinan dan Konektivitas antar Negara ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Penelitian Politik ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14203/jpp.v15i1.735
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTThe background of this article is based on the consideration that the policy pursued by America under the leadership of President Donald Trump is controversial, leading to a turbulence of world leadership. Furthermore the issue discussed in this paper is the in-consistent personality of President Donald Trump who encourages of controversial policies. The policy of protecting on national interest (America First) leads to protectionism and America's rebuilding policy (make America great again) encourages diplomatic tension. Apart from that, this paper also discusses the consequences of controversial policy direction towards world leadership turbulence especially in Middle East and Asia. The result of this study is a conclusion formulated that the in-consistent personality that existed in President Trump is a stimulus to the controversial policy and the controversial policy becomes the trigger for the world's leadership turbulence. Finally the recommendation of this paper is be careful in relations with America under President Trump.Keywords: controversy, turbulence, American policy, President of Trump]]>
<![CDATA[Pemerintahan Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono dan Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Ratna Shofi Inayati]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Politik Vol 2, No 1 (2005): Politik Pemerintahan Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Penelitian Politik ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14203/jpp.v2i1.390
<![CDATA[In his early presidential time President SBY took a series of visits to Australia, New Zealand and East Timor following his visit to Malaysia and Singapore a month before as his first step to start the Indonesian Diplomacy. In the next step, he also prepare to visit US and EU during May 2005. It indicates that President SBY still continues the basic strategy in the implementation of Indonesian Foreign Policy by President Megawati. Since the New Order govemment, Indonesia has adopt the Concentric Circle Formula as the base theory in the implementation of Indonesian Foreign Policy, putting emphasis on relation with countries within a series of concentric circles. The first concentric circle is ASEAN which is regarded as the comer stone of Indonesian foreign policy.The second circle, Indonesia puts a special emphasis on promoting relations with it’s Eastern and Southern neighbour, bringing Indonesian engagement with the Pacific Islands Forum, The South West Pacific Dialogue and the Tripartite Consultation between Indonesia, Australia and East Timor. Within the second concentric circle also includes Japan, China and South Korea in the ASEAN +3 forum.Beyond that, Indonesia puts in important attention to the relation with its major economic partners as US and EC, as regarded as the third concentric circle.]]>
<![CDATA[INDONESIA – TAIWAN ECA : A NEED OF STRONG POLICY ACTIONS ]]>
<![CDATA[Rene. L Pattiradjawane]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Politik Vol 12, No 2 (2015): Politik dan Kebijakan Publik: Perspektif Teori dan Praktis ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Penelitian Politik ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14203/jpp.v12i2.546
<![CDATA[This review discuss about the feasibility of economic cooperation agrrement between Indonesia and Taiwan (Republic of China). Although Indonesia do not have yet diplomatic relation with Taiwan, but in the economic context, Taiwan is one of important economic partner for Indonesia, since investment activity and trade between two countries are flourishing. This study promotes that the establishment of Economic Cooperation Agreement (ECA) between Indonesia and Taiwan will strengthen investment flows and enhance Indonesia-Taiwan economic relations. Besides, ECA will be considered as a fesible policy for both sides. The problem in enhancing further bilateral cooperation is the One China Policy. Because of the changing of geopolitical conditions in East Asia, Indonesia needs to consider the opportunity to reformulate the “One China Policy” and takes strong policy action in their relations. Keywords: Economic Cooperation Agrrement, Indonesia-Taiwan Relation, One China Policy. ]]>
<![CDATA[KONFLIK INTERNAL PARTAI POLITIK: STUDI KASUS PARTAI KEBANGKITAN BANGSA ]]>
<![CDATA[Kamarudin .]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Politik Vol 10, No 1 (2013): Partai Politik dalam Timbangan ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Penelitian Politik ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14203/jpp.v10i1.216
<![CDATA[Kajian ini menunjukkan, pertama, konflik internal yang melanda PKB dipicu oleh masalah yang bersifatpragmatis terkait dengan perebutan posisi dalam partai. Faktor pemicu yang bersifat pragmatis itu tidak hanyaberlaku ketika kalangan nahdliyin bergabung dengan komponen bangsa yang lain, seperti ditunjukkan oleh studiDeliar Noer (kasus NU keluar dari Masyumi) dan Bahtiar Effendy (kasus NU keluar dari PPP), namun studi inimenunjukkan bahwa faktor pragmatis itu juga berlaku saat konflik di antara sesama fungsionaris partai yang dilahirkan oleh kalangan nahdliyin terjadi. Studi Kang Young Soon yang menyimpulkan bahwa konflik merupakan“salah satu tradisi NU” pada akhirnya perlu ditambah dengan penjelasan bahwa “konflik yang dipicu oleh masalahpragmatisme kekuasaan merupakan salah satu tradisi NU.” Memang pemah ada konflik karena faktor ideologi,namun pragmatisme kekuasaan seringkah menjadi motif di balik perseteruan NU dengan pihak lain ataupun dengansesama kalangan nahdliyin seperti terlihat pada kasus konflik internal PKB. Kedua, terjadi pergeseran nilai dalamhubungan kiai-santri dalam tradisi pesantren yang menganut pola hubungan patron-klien ketika kalangan nahdliyinberkiprah di wilayah politik. Kasus konflik internal PKB ini menunjukkan bahwa sikap saling percaya yang menjadiunsur pembentuk budaya pesantren bisa berubah karena masalah pragmatisme kekuasaan.Kata Kunci: konflik internal, kubu, PKB]]>
<![CDATA[DINAMIKA PENYUSUNAN ANGGARAN DAERAH : KASUS PROSES PENETAPAN PROGRAM DAN ALOKASI ANGGARAN BELANJA DAERAH DI KABUPATEN SLEMAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Rozidateno Putri Hanida]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Politik Vol 7, No 1 (2010): Good Governance dan Korupsi ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Penelitian Politik ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14203/jpp.v7i1.513
<![CDATA[The article is a study of the dynamics of local budget arrangement especially in the process ofprogram decision and local budget expenses allocation in Sleman region Other dynamics in this study is the establishment ofegosectoral of division ofplanning namely SKPD in Sleman region In this regards planning proposal arrangedby SKPD has not showedpriority scale but rather compilation ofproposal that are reservedfrom process ofplanning It can be said that the SKPD proposal is premature therefore SKPD attempts to reserve budget expenseswithout considering budget limitation andprogram continuation in other SKPD The dynamics inpoliticalprocess islegislative body in Sleman region that is oriented to constituent interests hence neglecting the benefit ofaprogramand the value oftrickle down effect of a program On both levels there have been dynamics that show interactionbetween actors by sharing and bargaining interests The implication ofthis dynamics is that budgetingpolicy cannot increase society welfare instantly and an effective and efficient budget is difficult to achieve]]>
<![CDATA[MENELISIK PERAN TENAGA AHLI ANGGOTA LEGISLATIF ]]>
<![CDATA[Yogi Setya Permana]]>;
<![CDATA[Pandu Yuhsina Adaba]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Politik Vol 8, No 1 (2011): Menggugat Politik Parlemen ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Penelitian Politik ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14203/jpp.v8i1.479
<![CDATA[Performance oftheparliament would be maximal ifit s been back up with optimal support system Part ofthesupport systems is parliamentary expert staff As a matter offact performance and role ofthe expert staffs as partofsupporting Indonesia s parliamentary is not in optimal condition The condition is due to absence ofclear anddetail regulation on the role anffunction ofparliament expert staff As a result ofthat condition many distortionsin role andfunction ofexpert staffhas been dailyfact in the parliament This paper is to analyze thatproblem andgive some recommendation related to the problem]]>
