Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

Jurnal Konstitusi

jk
Website

Published by Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

ISSN : 18297706 EISSN : 25481657 DOI : 10.31078

Core Subject : Education, Social,

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Jurnal Konstitusi merupakan media triwulanan guna penyebarluasan (diseminasi) hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual tentang konstitusi dan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi terbit empat nomor dalam setahun (Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember). Jurnal Konstitusi memuat hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual (hasil pemikiran) tentang konstitusi, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi serta isu-isu hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan yang belum pernah dipublikasikan di media lain. Jurnal Konstitusi ditujukan untuk kalangan pakar, akademisi, praktisi, penyelenggara negara, LSM, serta pemerhati hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan.

Arjuna Subject : -

Articles 896 Documents

77 78 79 80 81

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Memuat Keadilan Sosial dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang M. Agus Maulidi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 4 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai lembaga yang lahir berdasarkan amandemen UUD 1945 memiliki fungsi sebagai lembaga terakhir penafsir konstitusi atau yang sering disebut sebagai the final interpreter of constitution. Fungsi ini biasanya dilaksanakan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam kewenangannya menguji undang-undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Terhadap frasa, ayat, pasal atau undang-undang yang dianggap tidak jelas atau multitafsir telah dimohonkan untuk diberikan penafsiran sesuai dengan konstitusi. Pun demikian dengan frasa keadilan sosial yang terdapat dalam beberapa undang-undang yang telah diputus Mahkamah Konstitusi. Terdapat 16 (enam belas) putusan dengan 10 (sepuluh) isu konstitusional dalam pengujian undang-undang selama periode 2003–2010 dalam bidang ketenagalistrikan, minyak dan gas bumi, ketenagakerjaan, sistem jaminan sosial nasional, sumber daya air, penanaman modal, pajak penghasilan, pengelolaan wilayah pesisir dan pulau-pulau kecil dan pertambangan mineral dan batu bara. Dari 10 isu konstitusional tersebut, dalam pertimbangan hukumnya Mahkamah lebih sering memilih menggunakan interpretasi gramatikal, interpretasi historis, interpretasi teleologis atau sosilologis dan interpretasi komparatif atau perbandingan. Mahkamah Konstitusi menyatakan bahwa keadilan sosial dalam Pembukaan UUD 1945, mengandung makna “penguasaan negara” artinya negara harus menjadikan penguasaan terhadap cabang produksi yang dikuasainya itu memenuhi tiga hal yang menjadi kepentingan masyarakat: ketersediaan yang cukup, distribusi yang merata, dan terjangkaunya harga bagi orang banyak. Dengan dikuasai oleh negara, keadilan sosial diartikan mencakup makna penguasaan oleh negara dalam luas yang bersumber dan diturunkan dari konsepsi kedaulatan rakyat Indonesia atas segala sumber kekayaan “bumi, air dan kekayaan alam yang terkandung di dalamnya”, termasuk pula di dalamnya pengertian kepemilikan publik oleh kolektivitas rakyat atas sumber-sumber kekayaan dimaksud. The Constitutional Court as an institution born based on the amendments to the 1945 Constitution has a function as the final interpreter of constitution. This function is usually carried out by the Constitutional Court in its authority to examine laws against the 1945 Constitution. Regarding phrases, verses, articles or laws that are deemed unclear or multiple interpretations have been requested to be interpreted in accordance with the constitution. Even so with the phrase social justice contained in several laws that have been decided by the Constitutional Court. There are 16 (sixteen) decisions with 10 (ten) constitutional issues in judicial review during the 2003–2010 period in the fields of electricity, oil and gas, employment, national social security systems, water resources, investment, tax income, management of coastal areas and small islands and mining of minerals and coal. Of the 10 constitutional issues, in its legal considerations the Court often chooses to use grammatical interpretations, historical interpretations, teleological or sosilological interpretations and comparative or comparative interpretations. The Constitutional Court stated that social justice in the Preamble of the 1945 Constitution, contained the meaning of "state control" means that the state must make control of the controlled branch of production fulfill three things that are in the public interest: adequate availability, equitable distribution and affordability. By being controlled by the state, social justice is interpreted to include the meaning of control by the state in a broad sense that is derived and derived from the conception of the sovereignty of the people of Indonesia over all sources of wealth "earth, water and natural wealth contained in it" the people for the intended sources of wealth.

Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Prinsip Dalihan Natolu sebagai Hak Konstitusional Masyarakat Adat Batak Toba Elisabeth Nurhaini Butarbutar
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum terhadap hak konstitusional masyarakat dalam nilai hukum “dalihan natolu” sebagai bagian dari sistem hukum Indonesia untuk upaya penegakan hukum. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif-empiris. Titik beratnya adalah penelitian kepustakaan (library research), sedangkan studi hukum sebagai kenyataan (perilaku) yang bersifat empiris dilakukan melalui penelitian terhadap perilaku atau pola tingkah laku masyarakat mengikuti nilai hukum dalihan natolu sebagai hukum yang hidup (the living law. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap hak masyarakat adat Batak Toba, dijamin secara konstitusional dalam Pasal 18 ayat (2) jo. Pasal 28 I ayat (3) UUD Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia sepanjang masih eksis sebagai sub sistem hukum Indonesia juga sebagai identitas budaya dan hak masyarakat tradisional yang merupakan hak asasi manusia yang harus dihormati. Sebagai sub sistem hukum, prinsip dalihan natolu, juga mempunyai tata cara dan pembagian tugas yang tegas antara ketiga unsur kekeluargaan/kekerabatan dalam menyelesaikan konflik yang terjadi antara kerabat yang terikat dalam prinsip dalihan natolu. Di samping itu, secara yuridis, ditentukan bahwa hakim dan hakim konstitusi sebagai penegak hukum wajib untuk selalu mengikuti perkembangan nilai-nilai hukum dan keadilan masyarakat dalam mengadili dan memutuskan perkara yang dihadapkan kepadanya.This research aims to determine the legal protection of the constitutional rights of the community in the legal value of "dalihan natolu" as part of the Indonesian legal system for law enforcement efforts. This research is a normative-empirical research. The emphasis is on library research, whereas legal studies as facts (behavior) are empirical conducted research on behavior or behavioral patterns of society that apply the legal values of dalihan natolu as a living law. The results show that the legal protection of the constitutional rights of the Toba Batak indigenous people is guaranteed constitutionally within the Constitution of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia as long as it still exists as a sub-integral of the Indonesian legal system and remains recognized in law enforcement efforts, because as a sub-system of law, the principle of dalihan natolu, also has a clear procedure and division of tasks between the three elements of kinship or kinship in resolving conflicts that occur between relatives who are bound in the principle of dalihan natolu. The reality of the validity of the principle of natolu dalihan is supported by the constitutional recognition of the state and reinforced by the granting of rights to customary law communities as parties to the dispute in the Constitutional Court. In addition, the obligation of judges and constitutional judges as law enforcers to always follow the development of legal values and justice of the community in splving and deciding cases faced to them.

Tafsir Konstitusional atas Kemandirian Penyelenggara Pemilu dan Pilkada Anna Triningsih
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Pemilu yang adil dan kredibel hanya dapat direalisasikan jika dikelola oleh badan independen. Konstitusi menyatakan bahwa pemilihan dilakukan oleh badan penyelenggara yang mandiri tanpa menjelaskan lebih lanjut makna kemandirian tersebut. Melalui metode penelitian hukum normatif dan dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui model kelembagaan penyelenggara pemilu pascareformasi dan makna independensi Pasal 22E ayat (5) UUD 1945 berdasarkan interpretasi Mahkamah Konstitusi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model kelembagaan penyelenggara pemilu pascareformasi adalah model independen yang tidak melibatkan perwakilan partai politik dan birokrasi. Sebagaimana tampak dari berbagai putusan pengujian undang-undang, Mahkamah Konstitusi menafsirkan bahwa kemandirian lembaga penyelenggara pemilu yang dikehendaki oleh UUD 1945 adalah kemandirian institusional, kemandirian fungsional, dan kemandirian personal.Credible and fair election can only be realized if managed by an independent institution. The Constitution states that elections are carried out by independent electoral management bodies without further explanation of the meaning of independence. Through normative legal research methods and by using statutory and case approaches, this research aims to find out the model of post-reform election management bodies and the meaning of independence of Article 22E paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution based on Constitutional Court interpretation. The results of this research found that the post-reform election organizing model is an independent model that does not involve representatives of political parties and bureaucracy. As can be seen from the judicial review rulings, the Constitutional Court interprets that the independence of election management bodies desired by the 1945 Constitution includes institutional independence, functional independence and personal independence.

Menakar Konstitusionalitas Syari’at Islam dan Mahkamah Syar’iyah di Provinsi Aceh Khairul Fahmi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Salah satu point penting yang diatur dalam perjanjian Helsinki terkait dengan penegakan hukum di Aceh adalah diberlakukannya Qanun dengan tujuan untuk menghormati tradisi sejarah Islam dan adat istiadat rakyat Aceh yang mayoritas muslim. Selain itu, untuk mensinergikan antara Qanun dengan pengadilan, maka di Provinsi Aceh dibentuk suatu sistem peradilan Syar’iyah yang tidak memihak dan independen, termasuk pengadilan tinggi yang tetap merupakan bagian dari sistem peradilan Republik Indonesia. Pembentukan Pengadilan Syar’iyah di Provinsi Aceh merupakan salah satu upaya untuk membuat kekhususan sebagaimana diatur dalam perjanjian Helsinki pada tahun 2005. Namun, dalam dataran teknis pengaturan manajemen pengadilan Syar’iyah juga masih terkendala khususnya oleh karena adanya dua aturan hukum yang berlaku yaitu Qanun yang dibuat oleh Dewan Perwakilam Rakyat Daerah Provinsi Aceh dan undang-undang yang dibuat oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat beserta Presiden. Hal tersebut berakibat Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Aceh yang mengatur tentang teknis pengaturan pengadilan Syar’iyah dan pembuatan Qanun juga banyak di lakukan judicial review ke Mahkamah Konstitusi. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk melakukan analisa tentang efektifitas pemberlakukan Qanun dan pengadilan Syar’iyah di Provinsi Aceh pasca di undangkannya Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Aceh. Adapun tulisan ini dibuat dengan menggunakan metode penulisan normatif dengan pendekatan studi historis dan pendekatan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengadilan Syar’iyah yang telah dibentuk di Provinsi Aceh meski pada awalnya mengalami kendala namun dapat berjalan baik. Adanya kekhususan yang diberikan kepada Provinsi Aceh merupakan bagian dari upaya untuk menjalankan amanat konstitusi khususnya Pasal 18B UUD 1945. One crucial point stipulated in the Helsinki agreement related to law enforcement in Aceh is the enactment of the Qanun with the aim of respecting Islamic historical traditions and the customs of the Acehnese people who are predominantly Muslim. Besides, to synergise between the Qanun and the court, in the Province of Aceh a Syar'iyah justice system was formed which was impartial and independent, including a high court which remained part of the judicial system of the Republic of Indonesia. The establishment of the Shariah Law in Aceh Province was one of the efforts to make it specific as stipulated in the Helsinki agreement in 2005. However, in the field of technical management of the Syariah court management is also still constrained especially due to the existence of two applicable laws namely the Qanun made by the Aceh Province Regional People's Representative Council and laws made by the House of Representatives and the President. This resulted in the Law on the Government of Aceh governing the Syar'iyah court and the Qanun being judged by the Constitutional Court. This paper aims to analyse the effectiveness of the implementation of Qanun and the Syar'iyah court in Aceh Province after the enactment of the Law on the Governing of Aceh. The writing is made using normative writing methods with historical study approaches, and case study approaches. The results of the study showed that the Syar'iyah court which had been formed in the Aceh Province even though initially had problems but could work well. The specificity given to the Aceh Province is part of an effort to carry out the mandate of the constitution, especially Article 18B of the 1945 Constitution.

Quo Vadis Pancasila sebagai Norma Konstitusi yang Tidak Dapat Diubah Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Pancasila memiliki posisi khusus dalam UUD 1945, Selain Pasal 37 ayat (5) UUD 1945 yang menyatakan, “khusus mengenai bentuk Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia tidak dapat dilakukan perubahan,” Pancasila yang narasinya terdapat dalam Alinea Keempat Pembukaan UUD 1945 merupakan salah satu norma konstitusi yang tidak dapat diubah (unamendable article). Hal ini dikarenakan Pasal 37 ayat (1) UUD 1945 menyatakan hanya pasal-pasal UUD 1945 yang dapat diubah, sedangkan Pembukaan UUD 1945 bukanlah termasuk pasal UUD 1945. Tulisan ini bermaksud untuk mencari tahu kaitan antara kedudukan Pancasila dalam ketatanegaraan Indonesia dan keberadaannya sebagai norma konstitusi yang tidak dapat diubah. Lebih lanjut, tulisan ini akan melihat konteks sejarah penentuan Pancasila sebagai dasar negara dan upaya untuk memasukan Pancasila dalam pasal UUD 1945. Selain itu, tulisan ini akan mengkaji putusan-putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang menyebut Pancasila sebagai sumber hukum dan dasar negara. Menurut Penulis, sebutan “Pancasila” perlu ditetapkan dalam pasal-pasal UUD 1945 untuk menegaskan secara expressis verbis bahwa Pancasila merupakan dasar negara atau ideologi bangsa. Hal ini penting untuk menjadikan Pancasila tidak sekedar sebagai jargon semata yang bahkan nama Pancasila tidak tersebutkan dalam UUD 1945 meskipun narasinya terdapat dalam Pembukaan UUD 1945.Pancasila has a special position in the 1945 Constitution, in addition to Article 37 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution which states, "specifically regarding the form of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, changes cannot be made," Pancasila which the narrative is contained in the Fourth Paragraph of the Opening of the 1945 Constitution is one of the constitutional norms that can not be changed (unamendable article). This is because Article 37 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution states that only the articles of the 1945 Constitution can be amended, while the Preamble to the 1945 Constitution does not belong to the 1945 Constitution. This paper intends to find out the relationship between the position of the Pancasila in Indonesian constitution and its existence as a constitutional norm which cannot be changed. Furthermore, this paper will look at the historical context of the determination of Pancasila as the basis of the state and efforts to include Pancasila in the 1945 Constitution article. In addition, this paper will examine the decisions of the Constitutional Court which called Pancasila as a source of law and the basis of the state. According to the author, the term "Pancasila" needs to be stipulated in the articles of the 1945 Constitution to expressly state that Pancasila is the basis of the state or ideology of the nation. It is important to make Pancasila not merely a jargon that even the name of Pancasila is not mentioned in the 1945 Constitution although the narrative is contained in the Preamble to the 1945 Constitution.

Perlindungan Hak Penyandang Disabilitas dalam Memperoleh Pekerjaan dan Penghidupan yang Layak bagi Kemanusiaan Bayu Dwi Anggono
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Decent work and livelihoods for humanity are part of human rights for everyone, including people with disabilities, so the 1945 Constitution provides guarantees and legal protection for their implementation. The problem is the discriminatory attitude towards persons with disabilities and the low level of education of persons with disabilities as a gap between people with disabilities and non-disabled workers. The absence of exact data related to the number of workers with disabilities both in the private sector and non-private sectors (PNS, BUMN and BUMD) raises its own problems in the protection of persons with disabilities. The quota of minimum requirement is 2 percent as a mandatory for the government, local government, BUMN, and BUMD and 1 percent for private companies from the number of employees or workers in the Disability Act is apparently not enough to provide protection for people with disabilities. This research is a normative legal research to examine the laws and regulations in order to obtain justice for persons with disabilities. This becomes very important as a form of government commitment through supervision and improvement of policies becomes very important so that persons with disabilities get decent work and livelihoods.

Justifikasi Hak Politik Mantan Narapidana: Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Perundang-Undangan Cipto Prayitno
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Decision of the Supreme Court Number 46 P/HUM/2018 regarding judicial review which invalidates the provisions of the Article 4 paragraph (3) of the General Election Commission Regulation Number 20 Year 2018 which states the prohibition of including candidates who are ex-convicts of drug cases, sexual crimes and corruption. However, the enactment of General Election Commission Regulation triggered pros and cons. On the one hand, the substance of the regulation regulates the prohibition and revoking the political rights of ex-convicted and contrary with the higher regulations, because it regulates the contrary substance with higher regulation. But on the other hand, this is a progressive step which is the hope for parties to shown the good image and free corruption legislative bodies. This paper raises 2 (two) problem formulations are (1) how is the regulation through the Election Commission Regulation related to political rights of convicted corruption cases and (2) how is the justification of the Human Rights dimension of the political rights of ex-corruption convicted. The purpose of this paper is to examine and find out how the General Election Commission Regulation Number 20 Year 2018 regulates the political rights of ex-corruption convicted as well as legal implications of the Supreme Court Decision Number 46 P/HUM/2018 towards General Election Commission Regulation Number 20 Year 2018. This study specifically uses normative legal method through library research and analyzed systematization into a descriptive analytical paper. The results showed that the enactment of the Election Commission Regulation that normalized the prohibition of passive political rights for ex-convicts contained several weaknesses and ultimately annulled by the Supreme Court’s Decision. Viewed from the perspective of Human Rights related to political-rights, in its application, there must be a limitation in the time of the revocation of rights.

Logika Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Uji Konstitusional Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Iskandar Muda
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Settlement of the problem of testing the law in the Constitutional Court (constitutional review) is also needed to find out the logic of the law and its relationship. If two statements are displayed simultaneously it will give rise to what by logic is called “logic relationship.” In the settlement of the six cases of constitutional review of the law on the Position of Notary Public (Law No. 30 Year 2004) and its Amendments (Law No. 2 Year 2014) revealed the use of various kinds of legal logic in legal considerations (ratio decidendi) of the Court. This research is a legal research using normative approach. The results showed that: (i) Constitutional Court Decision No. 009-014/PUU-III/2005 uses the legal logic of “equivalence relations,” (ii) Constitutional Court Decision No. 52/PUU-VIII/2010 uses the legal logic of “independent relationship,” (iii) Constitutional Court Decision No. 49/PUU-X/2012 uses the legal logic of “contradictory relationship,” (iv) Constitutional Court Decision No. 72/PUU-XII/2014 uses the legal logic of “independent relationship,” (v) Constitutional Court Decision No. 43/PUU-XV/2017 uses the legal logic of “independent relationship,” and (vi) in Constitutional Court Decision No. 22/PUU-XVII/2019 uses the legal logic of “contradictory relationship.”

Purifikasi Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 30/PUU-XVI/2018 M. Yasin Al Arif; Hasanuddin Muhammad
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

In the representation system, the Regional Representative Assembly (DPD) has an important role to articulate regional interests in state and government practices. Therefore, the DPD has an equal position with the DPR. This paper aims to determine the implications of the Constitutional Court's decision No. 30/PUUXVI/2018 on electoral developments in Indonesia especially the general election of DPD members which is limited to two main issues. First, what are the legal implications of the Constitutional Court's decision No. 30/PUU-XVI/2018 on the nomination of DPD and, second, what is the urgency of affirming DPD RI Members to be free from members of political parties? The results of the study indicate that the legal implications arising after the issuance of the Constitutional Court's decision No. 30/PUU-XVI/2018 happened to change the mechanism of registration of candidates for election candidates for DPD members and the urgency of affirming DPD members to be free from political parties is to avoid double representations and to strengthen the principle of checks and balances between the DPD and the DPR.

Penggunaan Global Positioning System dalam Tafsir Konstitusional Hak atas Informasi Hwian Christianto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Constitutional Court Decision Number 23/PUU-XVI/2018 has become the most waited decision by the society as the user of technology in driving, more specifically the use of Global Positioning System (GPS). There are at least 2 (two) main issues which are debated in the submission of the application of the constitutional testing of Article 106 paragraph (1) and Article 283 of Law 22/2009. First, the use of GPS is needed by the society so that it has become a part of the fulfillment of economical right. Second, the effort of protection of public order is being maintained by the former of Law 22/2009. A normative judicial method was used based on the legal principles, the ongoing regulations, and the consideration of the court on the legal issues being discussed. The court in the consideration gave a philosophical historical analysis on the existence of both rules of law as the base to understand the important meaning of the ban on the activity that causes distractions in driving on the street. Strangely, the court did not directly state that the use of GPS was definitely included in the second scope of both rules of law. The use of GPS needs to be case studied as an action that distracts concentration. Although the court finally stated that the application was denied, the decision gave a balanced understanding on the need of GPS as the navigation system while driving and the protection of the road users.

Page 79 of 90 | Total Record : 896

77 78 79 80 81

Filter by Year

2010 2022

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol 19, No 4 (2022) Vol 19, No 3 (2022) Vol 19, No 2 (2022) Vol 19, No 1 (2022) Vol 18, No 4 (2021) Vol 18, No 3 (2021) Vol 18, No 2 (2021) Vol 18, No 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name -

Contact Email -

Phone -

Journal Mail Official jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location Kota adm. jakarta pusat, Dki jakarta INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA