cover
Contact Name
TABRANI. ZA
Contact Email
tabraniza@scadindependent.org
Phone
+628116818656
Journal Mail Official
info.jip@scadindependent.org
Editorial Address
Jl. Tgk. Pulo Dibaroh, Kp. Baru, Kec. Baiturrahman, Kota Banda Aceh, Aceh 23242
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun
Published by SCAD Independent
ISSN : 23388617     EISSN : 24432067     DOI : 10.26811
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun (JIP), the International Journal of Social Sciences, is a leading peer-reviewed and open-access journal, which publishes scholarly work, and specializes in the Social Sciences, consolidates fundamental and applied research activities with a very wide-ranging coverage. This can include studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams, as well as research that evaluates or reports on the results of scientific teams. The main objectives are to promote interdisciplinary thinking and to provide scholars a platform to exchange knowledge from a variety of perspectives and locations, which had a significant impact and a real contribution to the community at large, practical and academic worlds. JIP published by SCAD Independent. Published 3 times per year (January, May, and September) with p-ISSN: 2338-8617 and e-ISSN: 2443-2067. JIP to offer open access to its content, with the principle that making research freely available to the public and supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. JIP is licensed under a Creative Commons 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works. Access permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at the digital libraries and open access journal databases
Articles 836 Documents
The Ambivalence of State Policies in Recognizing Local Religions within Indonesia’s Religious Pluralistic Society Hasse Jubba; Zuly Qodir; Salmy Edawati Yaacob; Mega Hidayati; Asriaty Asriaty; Rendy Adiwilaga
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 14 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun
Publisher : SCAD Independent

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26811/peuradeun.v14i3.2806

Abstract

This article analyzed the ambivalence of Indonesia’s state policies in recognizing local religions within a constitutionally pluralistic society. Although the constitution guarantees freedom of religion and belief, the practical implementation of related regulations reveals inconsistencies that marginalize adherents of local religions. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, this study mapped three forms of policy ambivalence, i.e., constitutional recognition versus administrative restriction, progressive regulation versus conservative bureaucracy, and diversity protection versus uniformity control. Data were collected through observations, interviews with adherents of local religions, and extensive analysis of legal documents and media reports. The findings demonstrated that normative recognition was weakened by bureaucratic practices that limit access to civil rights, education, ritual space, and public services. These inconsistencies placed local religious groups in a position of being “recognized yet constrained,” producing systemic discrimination through administrative categorization, supervisory mechanisms, and public order narratives. The article contributes to socio-legal scholarship by proposing a dialectical framework of “protection versus control” to explain how rights are negotiated within the legal-pluralistic context of Indonesia. It argues that substantive equality requires coherence in policy, accountable implementation, and strengthened bureaucratic capacity to ensure that recognition does not become an instrument of exclusion. The study concludes by urging future multimethod research to capture the diverse experiences of local religious communities in navigating state regulatory ambivalence.
Rethinking Diversion: A Preliminary Restorative Justice Framework for Child Offenders and Victims Raisa Rafifiti Choerunnisa; Nurliana Cipta Apsari; Muhammad Fedryansyah; Hery Wibowo
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 14 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun
Publisher : SCAD Independent

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26811/peuradeun.v14i3.2879

Abstract

Diversion may formally resolve juvenile cases without ensuring restorative justice for child offenders and child victims, particularly when successful agreement is treated as evidence of meaningful participation, accountability, and recovery. Addressing the limited understanding of how these dimensions operate as a continuous process, this study examines diversion practices and develops a preliminary restorative justice framework. This study employed a qualitative, multiple-case socio-legal design in two diversion cases in Bandung, Indonesia, involving 13 informants. Data from interviews, observations, documents, and contextual records were analyzed through within-case and cross-case analysis, triangulation, and theoretically sensitized interpretation. The findings reveal that both cases achieved apologies, negotiated responsibilities, family involvement, and court-approved agreements, yet preparation was uneven, children’s attendance did not consistently translate into meaningful influence, recovery and supervision remained family-dependent, and post-agreement professional support was inconsistently coordinated. The proposed framework integrates developmentally appropriate reintegrative accountability, Family Group Conferencing, rights-based safeguards, and social welfare across assessment, preparation, conferencing, differentiated accountability and recovery planning, implementation, and follow-up. The study reframes restorative diversion from agreement-centered resolution toward continuing, child-sensitive, and institutionally accountable restorative responsibility.
Rethinking Lecturer Productivity in Islamic Higher Education: Integrating Competence, Institutional Support, and Job Satisfaction Muhammad Yusup; Dina Hajja Ristianti; Muhammad Muhammad; Yosep Farhan Dafik Sahal; M Nurzen S
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 14 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun
Publisher : SCAD Independent

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26811/peuradeun.v14i3.2895

Abstract

Academic productivity in Islamic higher education is shaped not only by lecturers’ professional competence but also by the institutional conditions in which academic work is performed and interpreted. This study examined the relationships among lecturer competency, institutional environment, job satisfaction, and academic productivity in Private Islamic Higher Education Institutions (PTKIS) in Jambi, Indonesia. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed, involving 62 permanent lecturers in the quantitative phase and five purposively selected informants in the qualitative phase. Quantitative data were analyzed using PLS-SEM, followed by reflexive thematic analysis of explanatory interviews. The findings showed that competency and institutional environment were significantly associated with academic productivity, while the institutional environment was also significantly associated with job satisfaction. Job satisfaction mediated the relationship between institutional environment and academic productivity but did not mediate the competency–productivity relationship. Qualitative findings further showed that lecturers interpreted competence through professional and ethical responsibility and understood productivity beyond formal output indicators, including educational and societal contributions. The study demonstrates that personal and organizational resources contribute to academic productivity through different pathways, highlighting the importance of aligning lecturer competence with supportive institutional conditions and meaningful academic work.
Social Transfers and Fiscal Resilience in Resource-Dependent Regions: Dynamic Evidence from Indonesia’s Nickel Economy Rizal Rizal; Jafar Ahiri; La Dunifa; Muh Ilham; La Ode Suriadi; Iskandar Ibrahim; Ananta Anastasya
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 14 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun
Publisher : SCAD Independent

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26811/peuradeun.v14i3.2899

Abstract

Fiscal capacity in natural resource-dependent regions is often constrained by fiscal persistence, structural inequality, and economic shocks. This study examines whether social assistance strengthens local fiscal capacity through local tax revenue while controlling for inflation and fiscal persistence. Using balanced panel data from 17 districts/municipalities in Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia, for 2014–2023, the study applies two-step System GMM with Windmeijer-corrected standard errors to address dynamic persistence and potential endogeneity. The final estimation comprises 136 observations and 12 internal instruments. The results show that lagged local tax revenue positively and significantly affects current tax revenue (β = 0.3401; p < 0.001), confirming fiscal persistence. Social assistance also has a positive and significant association with local tax revenue (β = 0.0706; p = 0.0186), suggesting that social transfers may strengthen fiscal capacity through household purchasing power and local economic activity. Inflation is positively associated with local tax revenue (β = 0.0524; p = 0.0086), indicating nominal expansion of the tax base rather than necessarily improved real fiscal capacity. The study contributes by conceptualizing social assistance as a potential component of fiscal resilience, with implications for integrating social protection, local economic development, and tax administration in resource-dependent regions.
Effectiveness of Tat Twam Asi-Based Servant Leadership Model to Enhance Village Economic Performance Ketut Gunawan; I Nyoman Sukraaliawan; Ni Putu Sri Wati; Silky Roudhotus Sa&#039;adah; Rajiv Dharma Mangruwa; Morro Krubally
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 14 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun
Publisher : SCAD Independent

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26811/peuradeun.v14i3.2907

Abstract

Community-owned enterprises must pursue economic performance while maintaining social legitimacy, yet leadership research has insufficiently explained how indigenous ethical frameworks can be integrated into servant leadership in culturally embedded organizations. This study examined changes in participants’ assessments of village-owned enterprises (BUMDesa) performance after a Tat Twam Asi–based servant leadership intervention and explored the participants' experiences of its relevance and application. An embedded mixed-method quasi-experimental design involved 60 participants from 15 BUMDesa in Buleleng Regency, Indonesia. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, while interviews with 15 participants were thematically analyzed. Participants reported significantly higher post-intervention performance assessments than in the pretest (M = 3.51 vs. 2.49; Z = −6.685, p < .001), alongside positive perceptions of the training’s clarity, relevance, applicability, and participatory process. Qualitative findings further indicated increased confidence, role understanding, and perceived organizational capacity. The study positioned Tat Twam Asi not merely as cultural context but as a normative resource for interpreting service, reciprocity, responsibility, and legitimate authority within servant leadership. The findings extend culturally grounded leadership scholarship and offer implications for community-based enterprises operating at the intersection of economic objectives, collective responsibility, and local systems of legitimacy.
Balancing Digital Justice and Individual Rights: Comparative Criminal Court Transformation in Indonesia and Uzbekistan Muhammad Rustamaji; Behruz Shamsutdinov; Dildora Bazarova; Abdul Kadir Jaelani
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 14 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun
Publisher : SCAD Independent

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26811/peuradeun.v14i3.2911

Abstract

The rapid digitalisation of criminal justice promises greater efficiency and accessibility but also creates procedural risks when technological innovation outpaces safeguards for individual rights. Despite expanding scholarship on digital courts, comparative evidence remains limited on how different institutional trajectories shape the relationship between judicial technology and procedural protection in emerging Asian legal systems. This study examines how digital criminal proceedings affect individual rights in Indonesia and Uzbekistan and identifies the institutional conditions required for rights-sensitive digital justice. Using a qualitative comparative socio-legal design, the study analyses legislation, judicial and policy documents, official materials, and relevant scholarly literature through thematic content analysis and structured comparison. The findings reveal contrasting trajectories: Indonesia combines relatively established digital judicial infrastructure with fragmented criminal-specific regulation, whereas Uzbekistan pursues a more centrally coordinated Digital Court transformation while procedural safeguards continue to evolve. Across both systems, electronic evidence, remote hearings, digital case management, and AI-assisted tools generate efficiency and transparency gains but also risks concerning evidentiary reliability, meaningful participation, digital inequality, and human oversight. The study conceptualises this mismatch as institutional asynchrony, providing a comparative framework for designing accountable, contestable, and rights-sensitive digital justice beyond technologically consolidated jurisdictions.

Filter by Year

2014 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 14 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 11 No. 3 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 10 No. 3 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 9 No. 3 (2021): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 8 No 2 (2020): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 8 No 1 (2020): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 7 No 3 (2019): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 7 No. 3 (2019): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 7 No 2 (2019): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 7 No 1 (2019): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 6 No 3 (2018): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 6 No. 3 (2018): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 6 No 2 (2018): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 6 No. 1 (2018): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 6 No 1 (2018): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 5 No 3 (2017): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 5 No 2 (2017): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 5 No 1 (2017): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 4 No 3 (2016): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 4 No 2 (2016): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 4 No 1 (2016): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 3 No 3 (2015): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 3 No 2 (2015): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 3 No 1 (2015): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 2 No 3 (2014): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 2 No 2 (2014): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 2 No 1 (2014): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun More Issue