cover
Contact Name
Muhammad Virsyah Jayadilaga
Contact Email
pusbangdatin@gmail.com
Phone
+628122115449
Journal Mail Official
pusbangdatin@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan H.R. Rasuna Said Kavling 4-5, Jakarta Selatan 12940
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure
ISSN : 25798561     EISSN : 14105632     DOI : 10.30641
Core Subject : Education, Social,
The De Jure Legal Research Journal, known as Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, is a legal publication issued three times a year in March, July, and November. It is published by the Law Policy Strategy Agency of the Ministry of Law of the Republic of Indonesia, in collaboration with the Indonesian Legal Researcher Association (IPHI). This association was legalized under the Decree of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number AHU-13.AHA.01.07 in 2013, dated January 28, 2013. The journal serves as a platform for communication and a means to publish diverse and relevant legal issues primarily for Indonesian legal researchers and the broader legal community. In 2024, the management of the De Jure Legal Research Journal will include various stakeholders, as outlined in the Decree of the Head of the Law and Human Rights Policy Agency Number PPH-18.LT.04.03 for 2024, dated February 20, 2024, which establishes a publishing team for the journal. According to the Decree of the Director-General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia, Number PPH-18.LT.04.03 for 2024, which is based on the Accreditation Results of Scientific Journals for Period 2 of 2024, the De Jure Legal Research Journal has achieved a Scientific Journal Accreditation Rank of 2 (Sinta-2). This reaccreditation is valid for Volume 23, Number 1, of the year 2023, through Volume 27, Number 4, of the year 2027.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 9 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 23, No 4 (2023): December Edition" : 9 Documents clear
Hak Menguasai Tanah oleh Negara dalam Penggunaan Tanah untuk Investasi Evi Djuniarti
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 4 (2023): December Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.483-494

Abstract

Along with the enactment of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation which regulates land acquisition for investment, there are several conflicts about that. These investment provisions prevent investors to invest their capital in Indonesia. One way to fulfill investors' wishes is to carry out legal transplantation and harmonization. The problems are related to land control by the state for investment and the existence of investment laws and Job Creation laws which has problems with current legal provisions, as well as how to utilize transplantation in harmonization of laws and regulations governing investment. This article aims to find a solution to accelerate regulation through transplantation and harmonization of law in the land sector. This research uses normative juridical methods. The results found were that the investment regulations in the land sector, and the regulations in the job creation law, still overlap so that it becomes an obstacle for investors. Therefore, the acceleration of regulations to fulfill investors' desires is carried out through transplantation and legal harmonization.
Quo Vadis Pengadilan Khusus di Indonesia dalam Batasan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Bagus Hermanto; Nyoman Mas Aryani
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 4 (2023): December Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.403-418

Abstract

In Indonesia, special courts represent a phenomenon of judicial deference which is associated with an independent judicial system and supports the efficient and effective administration of justice. However, the practice in Indonesia shows that there is a need for further discursive research and thinking in the organization of the special justice system in Indonesia, based on internal and external issues in the realization of a special justice order that promotes substantive justice and is based on effectiveness, efficiency, and justice that is based on the needs of legal specificity under the specialized court context. This article utilizes dogmatic legal research based on a statutory approach, a case law approach, and a conceptual approach on a micro-legal research basis to examine the revamping of special courts in Indonesia, including the elaboration of Constitutional Court Decisions relevant to the strengthening of constitutional consolidation in post-reform Indonesia. Furthermore, the findings of this study show that the dynamics of special justice in Indonesia seem to be based on specific needs, international intervention in several cases, and ideas when the 1945 Constitution was amended by strengthening in accordance with conditions and times to achieve substantive justice. Similarly, the failure to build several special courts has become a discourse in recent decades, as various Constitutional Court decisions have directed topics that may be seen in the formation of special courts in the future. These include the existence of electoral and medical courts, which have also emerged as ideas for revamping specialized courts in Indonesia.
Formulasi Penanganan Sanksi Pidana Kerja Sosial terhadap Pelaku Korupsi Berbasis Keadilan Husin, Umar
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 4 (2023): December Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.495-506

Abstract

Law enforcement agrees that if crimes are categorized as serious or light, the perpetrators will be sentenced to prison sentences. There is no exception for perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption. In fact, Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code regulates social work crimes for perpetrators of corruption crimes. It is a question of what the ideal formulation of punishment should be for perpetrators of corruption crimes. The purpose of this writing is to obtain information related to the imposition of social work sanctions on perpetrators of corruption. The method used in this research is normative juridical. This research found that the application of social work criminal sanctions for perpetrators of crimes, especially corruption crimes, is part of fulfilling a sense of justice and respect for human rights. It also has an impact on reducing the number of convicts in correctional institutions. The government and DPR need to amend the Corruption Crime law so that it is in accordance with what is regulated in Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code, especially on article number 85
Aspek Hukum Hak Menguasai Negara DI Bidang Pertambangan Pasca Pembaruan Undang-Undang Mineral dan Batubara di Indonesia Andri Yanto; Faidatul Hikmah
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 4 (2023): December Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.419-432

Abstract

The concept of State Control Rights, as constitutionally attributed in Article 33 Paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution, constitutes a fundamental paradigm. The dialectics of mining policy formulation in Law No. 3 of 2020, which updated the regulation of minerals and coal, ushered in a series of transitions and consequences for the development of the concept of State Control in Indonesia, particularly concerning the substance of Article 4 Paragraph (2) of Law No. 3 of 2020, which introduced the policy of re-centralization. This research employs a juridical-normative method, utilizing a legislative approach and norm analysis pertaining to the concept of State Control Rights. The findings of this study indicate that, firstly, the formulation of state control in Law No. 3 of 2020 aligns intending to implement the concept of State Control as established by the Constitutional Court’s decision, emphasizing the permit system as a replacement for the contract system. Secondly, the centralization of authority over mineral and coal mining does not contradict the concept of State Control, as long as it can optimally generate an ideal and effective mining management system in advancing the prosperity of the people. The objective of this research is to provide a comprehensive overview of the application of State Control Rights in the revision of mining legislation, thereby offering policy insights for the development of substantive and just mining law in Indonesia.
Analisis Juridis terhadap Disparitas Putusan Hakim dalam Tindak Pidana Transaksi Elektronik dan Pencucian Uang (Studi Putusan Nomor :1240/Pid.Sus/2022/PN. Tng dan Putusan Nomor: 576/ Pid,Sus/2022/PN. Blb.) Donald, Henry Lbn Toruan; ., Djamilus; Rini, Nicken Sarwo; Fathony, Ahmad
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 4 (2023): December Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.507-522

Abstract

This article focuses on the crime of electronic transactions and money laundering. This focus was motivated by reports from victims of fraud by Indra Kenz and Doni Salman via videos circulating on social media regarding the investment business. This uses the Binomo and Quotex applications. During the examination at the Tangerang and Bale District Courts, Bandung, there was a disparity in the sentences imposed by the judges in decision Number: 1240/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Tng and Decision Number: 576/Pid,Sus/2022/PN.Blb. Indra was sentenced to 6 years and Doni to 4 years. Based on this, this article wants to analyze the reasons that the judge considered in deciding the criminal case of electronic transactions and money laundering for the two perpetrators with different sentences for the two perpetrators. This is because the criminal acts committed by the two perpetrators have similarities. This research uses a normative juridical method with a case approach. Sources of legal research materials used consist of judge's decisions, cases to be analyzed, legislation, books (literature) and scientific journals related to writings and data from news articles. The data collection procedure was carried out by searching data on the internet related to the writing topic. All data collected will be compiled and analyzed using theory or expert opinion. Then, this theory is linked to the reasons or legal considerations (ratio decidendi) used by the judge in making his decision. This study concluded that the disparity in sentences imposed on the two perpetrators was due to the lack of clear regulations prohibiting binary option trading affiliates. Apart from that, there are differences in regulations regarding the spread of fake news that harm consumers in the ITE Law and the Consumer Protection Law.
Menguji Posibilitas Transplantasi Variasi Bantuan Keuangan Partai Politik di Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan di Kolombia, Brazil, Korea Selatan, dan Turki) Garuda Era Ruhpinesthi; Muhammmad Hamzah Al Faruq
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 4 (2023): December Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.433-454

Abstract

There are variations in political party Financial Assistances in various countries with various implications, both positive and negative. Besides, there are problems with political parties in Indonesia which in literatures are suspected to be related to the regulation of political party Financial Assistances. This research focuses on answering two research problems. First, what are the implications for the regulation of various models of Financial Assistances for political parties in Colombia, Brazil, South Korea, and Turkey referring to the aspects of free and fair elections, democratic politics, and corruption index? Second, how is the possibility of legal transplantation of political party Financial Assistances in order to solve the problems of political parties in Indonesia? This research is socio-legal research that analyzes secondary data. The results of this study show two results. First, it shows that the law in four countries have different implications, which there are three notes namely that i) countries that are quite good in the aspect of free and fair elections are South Korea, Brazil, and Colombia, ii) the four countries are not good enough in the aspect of democratic politics, iii) countries that are quite good in the aspect of corruption index is South Korea. Second, it shows that there is the possibility of legal transplantation which there are three notes: i) there is a constant and dynamic variable regulation of political party Financial Assistances in Indonesia, ii) the problem of political party Financial Assistances in Indonesia is in the democratic politics and corruption index which means need to transplant several aspects, iii) there is a possibility of transplanting variations in political party Financial Assistances as long as certain conditions are fulfilled.
Disgorgement Fund untuk mewujudkan Corrective Justice sebagai upaya perlindungan hukum kepada investor di pasar modal Marsinta Simanjuntak
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 4 (2023): December Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.473-482

Abstract

Disgorgement Fund is the repayment of funds obtained through illegal or unethical business transactions, imposed on violators by courts. Legal protection for capital market investors in Indonesia is not yet effective and optimal. There is no easy way to claim compensation for losses in the capital market because investors consider losses as an investment risk. This article aims to analyze the implementation of disgorgement funds and disgorgement fund practices to realize corrective justice as an effort to protect the law for capital market investors in Indonesia. The method used is normative legal research, using primary and secondary legal sources. Data analysis techniques use conceptual methods and statutory approach methods. The results of the analysis show that OJK issued disgorgement fund regulations as an effort to improve investor protection and law enforcement in the capital market through POJK No. 65/POJK.04/2020 and SEOJK No. 17/SEOJK.04/2021. The regulation of the disgorgement fund mechanism still needs improvement to prevent violators from enjoying illegal profits, recover investors’ losses, and take preventive measures against future violations. The Directorate of Sanctions Determination and Capital Market Grievances at OJK emphasizes that the order for disgorgement of funds is not a lawsuit from the investor through remedial action, aligning with the principle of corrective justice, where all parties have equal rights to seek redress. Tighter supervision should be implemented by OJK to prevent legal violations while ensuring equity in the restoration of rights and the effectiveness of the legal system in dealing with disputes in the capital market.
Interlegality Perkawinan Beda Agama Vis a Vis Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomot 2 Tahun 2023 tentang Penolakan Permohonan Pencatatan Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia Noer Yasin; Musataklima Musataklima; Ahmad Wahidi
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 4 (2023): December Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.389-402

Abstract

The polemic of interfaith marriages is not a new problem at the legal level in Indonesia, especially with the issuance of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 2 of 2023 for District Courts to reject requests for registration of interfaith marriages. This has caused pros and cons in the community. The purpose of this research is to elaborate on the impact on the independence of judges and the constitutional rights of marriage actors, as well as the position of SEMA when faced with the rights of interfaith marriages conducted abroad and brought to Indonesia. This research can enrich insights into the discourse of interfaith marriage in Indonesia. This research uses a normative legal research method that relies on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials analyzed prescriptively. The results of this study are, First, SEMA can interfere with the independence of judicial power itself, where the Supreme Court is one of the actor of SEMA. Secondly, SEMA impacts the non-fulfillment of the constitutional rights of actors of interfaith marriages to obtain legal certainty, equality before the law, and legal protection. Thirdly, SEMA can trigger smuggling of law in interfaith marriages where the legal consequences must be recognized based on the principles of rights derived from foreign law, the principle of reciprocity, and the principle of comitas gentium. These three principles underlie the inter legality of interfaith marriages, so they have transnational legality. This research recommends that the Supreme Court revoke the SEMA that has been issued.
Pengaturan Penipuan dalam Hukum Perdata: Studi Perbandingan KUHPerdata Indonesia dengan Nieuw Burgerlijk Wetboek Belanda Ariyanto Ariyanto
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 4 (2023): December Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.455-472

Abstract

A person who commits fraud will move something as if something happened and was right but the act does not correspond to reality. The purpose of this study is to examine the elements of Fraud in Article 1328 of the Indonesian Civil Code and examine the regulation of fraud (bedrog) in the civil code in the Netherlands. This research is a Normative Legal Research which is legal research carried out by examining library materials or secondary data. Normative legal research is also called doctrinal legal research. The results indicated that the explanation of the definition of fraud (bedrog) has been regulated in Article 1328 of the Civil Code, but the substantial understanding has not been regulated in Article 1328 of the Indonesian Civil Code, fraud in Dutch civil law is regulated in article 3:44 Nieuw Burgerlijk Wetboek. The recommendation that the author can note is that as one of the countries adopted by Indonesia, it is appropriate for Fraud to get elaboration and technical procedures to identify Fraud as a defect of will. Bedrog is defined by definition as an act in which a party entices another party to take certain legal actions by, among others: making false and deliberate statements; deliberately not disclosing the fact that it should be mandatory to disclose, and intentionally withholding or providing incomplete information. The formulation of the definition in the NBW should be a reference in the renewal of the Civil Code related to Bedrog.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 9