Articles
132 Documents
<![CDATA[Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sejarah Siswa di SMAN 28 Kab. Tangerang ]]>
<![CDATA[Mirla Safrina boru]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 6 No 1 (2017): JPS - Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, Volume 6 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah Pascasarjana UNJ ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (442.485 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21009/JPS.061.04
<![CDATA[The research aim to investigate the influence of instructional models cognitive style toward history learning outcome of students at SMA Negeri 28 Kab. Tangerang. This research is quantitative research using design treatment by level 2x2. The population of this research is all students of X IIS grade. The sample consist of two classes that X IIS 2 and X IIS 4 with 67 people amount. For the experimental class X IIS 2 are 32 student and from control class X IIS 4 are 35 student will be selected. The instrument used to assess students achievement is in the multiple choice form, while the instrument used to assess students cognitive style is in test GEFT. Among the result of the research are: (1) History learning outcome of students who follow TGT instructional models higher than the student who studied with direct instruction model, (2) History learning outcome of students who have Field Independent cognitive style higher than student who have a Field Dependent cognitive style, (3) There is interaction effect between models of instructional and cognitive style on history learning outcome of student.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sejarah di SMA Negeri 4 Karawang ]]>
<![CDATA[Ikina Sabilillah]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 6 No 1 (2017): JPS - Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, Volume 6 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah Pascasarjana UNJ ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (402.815 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21009/JPS.061.05
<![CDATA[The aim of this research is to find the influence of a model of learning and achievement motivation to History Learning Outcomes in SMA Negeri 4 Karawang.This study is a kind of research quantitative with using the experiment design treatment by level 2x2. This research is quantitative which using experiment design treatment method by level 2x2.The population in this research are all the students in elevent grade,Sampel of research are XI IIS 2 and XI IIS 3 people a mount 60. The Instruments that used to the study the history learning outcomes is multiple choice and the instrument that used to know the result of achievement motivation is quisioner. The results of research refer to: (1) History learning outcomes that was giving STAD Learning Model is higher than was giving Direct Learning, (2) There is the influenanceimteraction between learning model and achievement motivation, (3) History learning outcomes that has achievement motivation and STAD Learning model is higher than was giving Direct learning model. (4) History learning outcome that has achievement motivation low and was giving STAD Learning model than was giving Direct Learning model.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran dan Sikap Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sejarah Siswa di SMA Pondok Karya Pembangunan Jakarta Timur ]]>
<![CDATA[Andi Andi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 6 No 1 (2017): JPS - Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, Volume 6 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah Pascasarjana UNJ ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (415.83 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21009/JPS.061.06
<![CDATA[The aim of this research is to find out the effect of learnning method and students attitude on history studies to the result of student’s history learning in SMA Pondok Karya Pembangunan Jakarta Timur. This reseacrh is quantitative research that used experiment design treatment method by level 2x2. Instrument that writer used to measure the student’s attitude is questioner, and instrument that writer used to measure the result of learning is Multiple Choice. The result of research showed those (1). The result of learning history that students used mind mapping were higher than students in convensional learning. (2) there is interaction’s effect between the method of learning and student’s attitude. (3) the result of student’s history learning that use mind mapping have positive attitude is higher than student which use convensional learning. (4) the result of learning history, the students were used mind mapping method have negative’s attitude lower than students used convensional learning which have negative attitude]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Kecerdasan Sosial Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sejarah ]]>
<![CDATA[agi Hagiaman]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 6 No 1 (2017): JPS - Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, Volume 6 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah Pascasarjana UNJ ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (410.825 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21009/JPS.061.07
<![CDATA[The purpose of this research is to know the difference of learning result of history between students studying with cooperative learning model of group investigation type with conventional learning model, the influence of interaction between learning model with social intelligence to historical learning result, difference of historical learning result between students who have social intelligence High learning group model investigation with students who have high social intelligence learning with conventional learning model, differences in historical learning outcomes between students who have low social intelligence who learn with group investigation model with students who have low social intelligence learning by model of learning Conventional. The research method used experimental method with factorial design 2x2 by level. The population of this research is students of SMA Negeri 1 Jatisari class XI (eleven) IPS. The sample of research is two classes taken randomly by technique (cluster random sampling). The research instrument uses questionnaires and test results of learning. The result of the research shows that there is influence and difference of the result of history learning between the students who have high social intelligence and low social intelligence that study with cooperative learning model of group investigation type and conventional learning model.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Kecerdasan Intelektual Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sejarah Siswa di SMA Negeri 1 Karawang ]]>
<![CDATA[Indah Megawati]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 6 No 2 (2017): JPS - Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah Pascasarjana UNJ ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (430.272 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21009/JPS.062.01
<![CDATA[This research is purpose to find the influence of instructional model and intellegencequotient to history learning outcomes in Senior High School 1 Karawang. This research isquantitative type with use experiment design methode treatment by level 2x2. The instrument whichused to result of history learning is multiple choices test. Besides, intellegence quotient gets by resultof students' IQ test. This test is organized by an institute for IQ test. At that time students' receive inKarawang Senior High School 1. This research's result shows that: (1) result of history learning forstudents who follows learning model Numbered Heads Together ( NHT) is higer than students whofollows conventional learning model. (2) there are interactions between learning model andinttelegence quotient (3) students who follows history learning by use NHT learning model by highintellegence quotient is higer than srudents who follows conventional learning model by highintellegence quotient (4) students' result of history learning who follows NHT learning model bu lowintellegence quotient is lower that students' who follows conventional learning method by lowintellectual.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran dan Kemandirian Belajar Terhadap Sikap Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Sejarah di SMA Negeri 3 Karawang ]]>
<![CDATA[Taupik Taupik]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 6 No 2 (2017): JPS - Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah Pascasarjana UNJ ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (442.623 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21009/JPS.062.02
<![CDATA[This research is purpose to find out the influence of instructional method and learningautonomy to student's attitude in Karawang Senior High School 3. This research is quantitative typewhich uses treatment of experiment design method by level 2x2. Both student's attitude and learningautonomy at learning history are used quetionaire instrument. Based on result of research shows that:(1) student' attitude who think pair share learning method is higer than student's attitude whofollows conventional learning method (2) there are interactions between learning method andconventional learnig (3) student's attitude of learning history which uses think pair share learningmethod and high autonomy learning is higer than student's attitude who follows conventionallearning method with high aoutonomy learning (4)student's attitude who follows think pair sharelearning method at learning history is lower than student's attitude who follows conventionallearning method with low autonomy learning.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sejarah Siswa di SMA Negeri 5 Depok Kelas 11 IPS ]]>
<![CDATA[Yusuf Budi Santosa]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 6 No 2 (2017): JPS - Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah Pascasarjana UNJ ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (440.183 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21009/JPS.062.03
<![CDATA[This research has a purpose to determine the extent of the influence fromproblem solvingmethod and the ability to learn think creatively for the outcomes of studyinghistory for students inpublic high school 5 Depok class of 11 IPS. This research is a quantitative research by usingexperimental methods, treatment by level 2x2 design. The instrument used tolearn history is amultiple choice test and for the test for ability to think creatively is questionnaire. 1) The results of themethods showed that the learning outcomes from students who take the history learning withinstructional solving methods (problem solving) higher than students who follow conventionalteaching methods; 2) there are significant interactions between instructional solving method (problemsolving) and the creative thinking ability for students learning outcomes of history; 3) the results ofstudying the history of students who take the learning solving method (problem solving) with creativethinking ability, higher than the historical learning outcomes of students who take conventionalteaching methods with high creative thinking abilities; 4) the results of learning the history ofstudents who take the method of problem solving (problem solving) with creative thinking ability islow, lower than the historical learning outcomes of students who take the instructional conventionalmethods and low creative thinking ability.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran dan Kesadaran Sejarah Pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sejarah Siswa di SMA Negeri I Muara Bungo/Jambi ]]>
<![CDATA[Nanda Permana]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 6 No 2 (2017): JPS - Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah Pascasarjana UNJ ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (436.84 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21009/JPS.062.04
<![CDATA[The aim of this research is to find out the effect of learnning method and historicalconsiousness on history studies to the result of student’s history learning in SMA I MuaraBungo/Jambi. This reseacrh is quantitative research that used experiment design treatment method bylevel 2x2. Instrument that writer used to measure the historical consiousness is questioner, andinstrument that writer used to measure the result of learning is Multiple Choice. The result ofresearch showed those (1). The result of learning history that students used CIRC were higher thanstudents in convensional learning. (2) there is interaction’s effect between the method of learning andhistorical consiousness. (3) the result of student’s history learning that use CIRC have historicalconsiousness is higher than student which use convensional learning. (4) the result of learninghistory, the students were used CIRC method have low historical consiousness lower than studentsused convensional learning which have low historical consciousness.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Terhadap Kesadaran Sejarah Siswa SMA Islam Al Azhar Kelapa Gading Jakarta ]]>
<![CDATA[Wage Wardana]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 6 No 2 (2017): JPS - Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah Pascasarjana UNJ ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (491.498 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21009/JPS.062.05
<![CDATA[The aim of study is to reveal the effect of learning methods and critical thinking style tostudent historical consciousness in Al Azhar Kelapa Gading Senior High School Jakarta. Thisresearch used is the experimental method. Research instrumentation will include a test that will beused to measure students history awareness from instructional methods and critical thinking style ofstudents. As for out come of this research are : (1) Student’s historical consciousness who are usingthe problem solving method will higher than students who used conventional method, (2)There is aninteraction between learning method and critical thinking style toward historical consciousness, (3)Student’s historical consciousness who have a high critical thinking and use a problem solvingmethod are higher than students who have a high critical thinking style using a conventional method,(4) Student’s historical consciousness who have a low critical thinking style and using a problemsolving methods are lower than students who have a high critical thinking style using a conventionalmethods.]]>
<![CDATA[Pembelajaran Sejarah Berbasis Kurikulum 2013 di SMA Kotamadya Jakarta Timur ]]>
<![CDATA[Zia Ulhaq]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 6 No 2 (2017): JPS - Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah Pascasarjana UNJ ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (451.13 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21009/JPS.062.06
<![CDATA[This study aims to obtain a systematic description of the implementation of the 2013curriculum on learning history in high school East Jakarta Municipality. The research location is inSMAN 81 Jakarta and SMA Angkasa 1 Jakarta. This research uses qualitative approach with methodof grounded theory of research data. The results showed that the understanding of teachers in thegrassroot on various learning concepts both in terms of planning, implementation to evaluation isquite low. From the planning, implementation and assessment, only the implementation of learningthat can be implemented by teachers in the research location, while planning and assessment is notimplemented optimally. showing by teachers not making the completely lesson plan, teachers assumetwo subjects of history in secondary school (history of Indonesia and history) are the same subjects, aswell as the use of attitude assessment techniques that only use observation techniques. In addition, itwas also found out that historical learning in the research sites has been based on commucication andinformation technology in accordance with the saintifik approach in the curriculum of 2013.]]>
