cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Filsafat
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 08531870     EISSN : 25286811     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Art, Social,
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences
Jurnal Filsafat is a scientific journal that first published in 1990, as a forum for scientific communication, development of thinking and research in philosophy. Jurnal Filsafat is published twice a year, in February and August with p-ISSN: 0853-1870, and e-ISSN: 2528-6811 The Editorial Team of Jurnal Filsafat accepts manuscript in the field of philosophy which has never been published in other media. Editorial Team has the right to edit the manuscript as far as not changing the substance of its contents.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 583 Documents
 55   56   57   58   59 
Diarchic Hospitality: Richard Kearney on Arche and Otherness Stephen Rehmalem Eliata
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 36, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.106652

Abstract

Hospitality is a theoretical concept that underlies intersubjectivity, that is, my acceptance of the coming of strangers. Derrida and Caputo propose the concept of anarchy hospitality as the most radical form of hospitality, where hospitality occurs without a source/principle because the I fully welcomes the other. However, Kearney criticizes this thought because it actually creates a space for violence. The problem of an-archic radical hospitality lies in the asymmetrical relation between the I and the Other. Kearney's critique leads to the question of what the source/principle (arche) of radical hospitality is. In this paper, I argue that Kearney's concept of hospitality can produce radical hospitality through two arches: the necessary existence of the I and the other. Radical hospitality is hospitality in a symmetrical relational structure. As a competing concept of anarchy hospitality from Derrida and Caputo, I will call this hospitality model as di-archic hospitality. To prove my point, this study employs a qualitative methodology that integrates meta-analysis with conceptual analysis. First step, I will explain Kearney's thoughts on otherness. Secondly, I will explain Kearney's thoughts on arche. Finally, I will draw conclusions from the study that has been conducted.
Follow Your Conscience? A Comparison of Aquinas and Arendt Heribertus Dwi Kristanto; Arokiaraj Joseph Patrick
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 36, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.110716

Abstract

Should we always follow our conscience? Through a close reading of the works of Aquinas and Arendt, this paper argues that conscience alone is insufficient for determining right actions. After witnessing Eichmann’s trial, Arendt questioned the reliability of conscience as traditionally understood. Traditionally, conscience is considered the voice of God and an infallible moral compass. Aquinas, a traditional thinker, developed a systematic theory of conscience. However, Aquinas does not view conscience as the voice of God or an infallible moral guide. Rather, conscience is an act of reason applying moral knowledge to particular actions. Consequently, conscience is fallible and must be supplemented by moral virtues and prudence (prudentia). Prudence is the practical wisdom that guides the will and helps one discern the best course of action in specific circumstances. For Arendt, conscience is a byproduct of thinking that evaluates one’s actions. Since thinking is an inner dialogue, conscience is subjective and requires judgment—namely, the capacity to evaluate actions from others’ viewpoints through mutual debate and enlightenment. In conclusion, prima facie, we must always listen to the voice of our conscience, but not without critical reflection and prudence.
The Configurative Role of Emptiness in Hylectic Consciousness: A Phenomenological Investigation Amar Yanuar Pamungkas
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 36, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.112716

Abstract

Husserl’s Ideas I distinguishes a noetic approach from a hyletic (material) one, yet his emphasis on the former leaves the latter conceptually underdeveloped. This underdevelopment fuels familiar objections: the enigmatic status of non-intentional “data,” worries about immanentism and idealist drift, and suspicions that correlationism licenses a tacit humanism. I offer a critical reconstruction of the hyletic dimension that preserves Husserl’s texts while clarifying its role in phenomenological analysis. Methodologically, I conjoin a conceptual analysis of hyletic and noetic moments with a phenomenological account of their correlation in givenness (Gegebenheit). The claim is that hyletic content, through distinctive modes of “emptiness,” functions configuratively, structuring intentional experience rather than simply stocking it with data. On this view, the hyletic is not brute sensory matter but a condition for what I call epistemic reversibility within consciousness: the capacity of experience to reconfigure its own evidential bearings by way of hyletic modulation. This reinterpretation addresses the standard critiques and repositions hyletics as an internally normative moment of Husserlian phenomenology.

Page 59 of 59 | Total Record : 583

 55   56   57   58   59 

Filter by Year

1990 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 36, No 1 (2026) Vol 35, No 1-2 (2025): Special Issue 2025: Law and Politics Vol 35, No 2 (2025): (Article in Press) Vol 35, No 1 (2025) Vol 34, No 2 (2024) Vol 34, No 1 (2024) Vol 33, No 2 (2023) Vol 33, No 1 (2023) Vol 32, No 2 (2022) Vol 32, No 1 (2022) Vol 31, No 2 (2021) Vol 31, No 1 (2021) Vol 30, No 2 (2020) Vol 30, No 1 (2020) Vol 29, No 2 (2019) Vol 29, No 1 (2019) Vol 28, No 2 (2018) Vol 28, No 1 (2018) Vol 27, No 2 (2017) Vol 27, No 1 (2017) Vol 26, No 2 (2016) Vol 26, No 1 (2016) Vol 25, No 2 (2015) Vol 25, No 1 (2015) Vol 24, No 2 (2014) Vol 24, No 1 (2014) Vol 23, No 3 (2013) Vol 23, No 2 (2013) Vol 23, No 1 (2013) Vol 22, No 3 (2012) Vol 22, No 2 (2012) Vol 22, No 1 (2012) Vol 21, No 3 (2011) Vol 21, No 2 (2011) Vol 21, No 1 (2011) Vol 20, No 3 (2010) Vol 20, No 2 (2010) Vol 20, No 1 (2010) Vol 19, No 3 (2009) Vol 19, No 2 (2009) Vol 19, No 1 (2009) Vol 18, No 3 (2008) Vol 18, No 2 (2008) Vol 18, No 1 (2008) Vol 17, No 3 (2007) Vol 17, No 2 (2007) Vol 17, No 1 (2007) Vol 16, No 3 (2006) Vol 16, No 2 (2006) Vol 16, No 1 (2006) Vol 14, No 3 (2004) Vol 14, No 2 (2004) Vol 14, No 1 (2004) Vol 13, No 3 (2003) Vol 13, No 2 (2003) Vol 13, No 1 (2003) Vol 10, No 2 (2000) Jurnal Filsafat Seri 30 Oktober 1999 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 29 Juni 1999 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 28 Juli 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 27 Maret 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Edisi Khusus Agustus 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 26 Desember 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 25 Mei 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 24 Februari 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 23 November 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 22 Agustus 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 21 Mei 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 20 Desember 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 19 Agustus 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 18 Mei 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 17 Februari 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 16 November 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 15 Agustus 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 14 Mei 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 13 Februari 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 12 November 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 11 Agustus 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 10 Mei 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 9 Februari 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 8 November 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 7 Agustus 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 6 Mei 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 5 Februari 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 4 November 1990 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 3 1990 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 1 1990 More Issue