cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Filsafat
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 08531870     EISSN : 25286811     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Art, Social,
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences
Jurnal Filsafat is a scientific journal that first published in 1990, as a forum for scientific communication, development of thinking and research in philosophy. Jurnal Filsafat is published twice a year, in February and August with p-ISSN: 0853-1870, and e-ISSN: 2528-6811 The Editorial Team of Jurnal Filsafat accepts manuscript in the field of philosophy which has never been published in other media. Editorial Team has the right to edit the manuscript as far as not changing the substance of its contents.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 580 Documents
 54   55   56   57   58 
Teachers as Moral Agents: The Ethics of Care and Educational Responsibility Damayanti, Cicilia; Engliana, Engliana
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 35, No 2 (2025): (Article in Press)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.97185

Abstract

This article examines the ethics of care through the concepts developed by prominent thinkers in the field, such as Nel Noddings and Joan Tronto. Their concepts can be effectively integrated into educational practices. The ethics of care emphasizes the significance of attending to others and our environment through concrete actions, a principle especially pertinent within educational settings. Drawing upon a comprehensive literature review of key works on the ethics of care, this study primarily utilizes Noddings' framework as its foundational analytical lens. The findings highlight that collaboration between teachers and students is crucial for cultivating a caring character. Furthermore, positive role models and support from the surrounding environment are vital in motivating individuals, thus enabling them to give positive contributions to society and the environment. This demonstrates that young learners, including those with special needs, can make significant  positive contributions to society and the environment. In conclusion, education rooted in the ethics of care not only supports students' moral development but also lays the groundwork for fostering a more empathetic and socially responsible generation.
Postmodernism and the Crisis of Trust in Government: An Analysis of Michel Foucault's Thought Holivil, Ernestus; Wulakada, Hamza H.; Gasa, Frederik Masri; Long, Belandina Liliana
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 35, No 2 (2025): (Article in Press)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.105203

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the causes of the crisis of trust in government from a postmodernist perspective, referring to Michel Foucault's concepts of governmentality and biopolitics. The central research question explores how power, as expressed through public policy discourse, can impact government legitimacy, particularly during global crises. A qualitative approach is used, employing critical philosophical analysis of Foucault's texts, with case studies on pandemic policies and the use of surveillance technology. The findings reveal that the decline in public trust is not only due to administrative failures but also due to the way governments manage policy discourse in ways that are opaque and manipulative. Based on these findings, the study suggests that governments should adopt more transparent and participatory policy approaches, increasing public involvement in decision-making processes to strengthen the legitimacy of the government, which has been undermined. 
The Psychological Dynamics of Solastalgia: A Reflective Foundation for Indonesian Social Science and Humanities Scholars Pelupessy, Muhammad Kashai Ramdhani; Tihurua, Ode Zulkarnain Sahji
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 35, No 2 (2025): (Article in Press)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.105670

Abstract

Solastalgia is a form of existential distress that emerges when individuals experience a rupture in their relationship with their dwelling due to drastic environmental changes. Despite its serious psychological implications, this phenomenon has not been widely discussed, particularly among scholars of social and human sciences, such as psychologists, anthropologists, and sociologists in Indonesia. Therefore, this article provides a reflective foundation by drawing on the phenomenologies of Heidegger and Husserl to focus on the meaning of place, self-identity, and emotional attachment. The dynamics of those three factors is what potentially contributes to the emergence of solastalgia. Based on a literature review, this article engages in a reflective discussion on: (1) how dwelling is perceived and understood by individuals; (2) findings regarding the disconnection between individuals and their dwellings; (3) the psychological dynamics of solastalgia; and (4) the urgency of solastalgia research in Indonesia. This study is expected to serve as a reflective point of departure for social and human sciences scholars in Indonesia—such as psychologists, anthropologists, and sociologists—who wish to investigate solastalgia in a deeper and more critical manner.
Why Mathematics Shapes Reality: A Philosophical Inquiry Dethan, Nugraha K. F.; Nelloe, Merlyn Kristine
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 35, No 2 (2025): (Article in Press)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.106411

Abstract

Most discussions in the philosophy of mathematics have been dominated by questions concerning the nature of mathematical entities, such as numbers and sets, while comparatively little attention has been given to the applicability of mathematics. Yet mathematics has played an indispensable role in the development of the natural sciences, suggesting that any complete philosophy of mathematics must account for its remarkable effectiveness in describing the physical world. Two major schools of thought, namely Platonism and Nominalism, have largely neglected this issue and seem unable to provide a satisfactory explanation for the tremendous success of mathematics in the physical sciences. However, this limitation does not apply  universally across all philosophical approaches. This limitation specifically reflects the weakness of Platonism and Nominalism in connecting mathematical entities to empirical reality. In this article, we investigate the philosophy of mathematics from the standpoint of alternative views, particularly Steiner’s Anthropocentric approach and Franklin’s Aristotelian Realism, which offer promising frameworks for understanding the deep connections between mathematics and empirical reality. This preference for alternative approaches is justified by their potential to explain the effectiveness of mathematics as a tool in science, emphasizing its applicability and alignment with scientific contexts. The result of this study indicates that Aristotelian Realism provides a more robust framework for explaining the empirical success of mathematics compared to other approaches. Aristotelian Realism stands out as a superior philosophy of mathematics, centering its applicability as the core of its philosophical understanding.
Science, Power, and Democracy: A Critical Perspective of Political Influence on Knowledge Production Islami, Moch Zihad; Muthmainnah, Lailiy
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 35, No 1-2 (2025): Special Issue 2025: Law and Politics
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.100391

Abstract

This study aims to explore the relationship between science, power, and democracy. This relationship stems from the fundamental argument that science is always linked to values, whether political, ideological, or even economic interests. While science can contribute positively to transforming public life for the better, it can also give rise to exclusivity and elitism in the scientific community, which can undermine democratic principles and values. This study demonstrates that the relationship between science and politics is ambivalent, as it can both strengthen the legitimacy of public governance and create the risk of technocracy and expert dominance, leading to the public being perceived as lacking adequate epistemic capacity in certain scientific fields. Therefore, efforts are needed to steer science toward a true public interest through the democratization of science, both procedurally and substantively. However, normative boundaries remain crucial: when emerging public values are discriminatory, scientists are obligated to reject them, as they contradict the egalitarian principles that underlie democracy. Furthermore, public trust in science must be maintained by ensuring that the public is fully imagined and involved in the knowledge production process. Thus, public-oriented science must be committed to the values of humanity and equality.
Camusian Rebellion and the Ethical Limits of Posthumanism Sidabutar, Chrisoneiro Yoshua
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 35, No 2 (2025): (Article in Press)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.97438

Abstract

This article examines how Albert Camus’s concepts of absurdity and rebellion can serve as an ethical framework in responding to posthumanist ideologies that challenge human subjectivity and autonomy. The research objective is to critically analyze the relevance of Camus’s existential philosophy in addressing the ethical dilemmas posed by posthumanism, particularly regarding technological transcendence and the erosion of human finitude. Adopting a normative-philosophical approach with textual analysis, the study investigates whether Camus’s notion of authentic rebellion offers a critical stance against posthumanist aspirations. The findings reveal that Camus’s idea of rebellion, grounded in justice, limits, and dignity, provides a strong ethical response to the dehumanizing effects of posthumanism. The study concludes that Camusian ethics affirms human responsibility and offers resistance to metaphysical escapism in hyper-technological contexts.
Computational and Thought Language: Beyond The Searle—Dennet Paradigm Mukmin, Muhammad Andry; Putri, Luh Gede Saraswati; Manalu, Abby Gina Boang
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 35, No 2 (2025): (Article in Press)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.105975

Abstract

This study examines the ontological tension in the debate between John R. Searle and Daniel C. Dennett regarding the relationship between language and consciousness, and then proposes the model of Computational Language and Thought Language as a new analytical framework. Computational Language is understood as a syntactic, algorithm-based language without intentionality. Conversely,Thought Language is a conceptual-intentional expression rooted in phenomenological consciousness. Through a conceptual-critical analysis grounded in the hermeneutic-phenomenological tradition, the study demonstrates that artificial intelligence can only produce Computational Language, whereas Thought Language cannot be reduced to computational operations. Neurocognitive evidence, such as the activation of Broca’s area in syntactic processing, supports the description of Computational Language, while Thought Language remains positioned as an ontological construct beyond empirical verification. This model not only maps the epistemic limits of artificial intelligence but also opens new avenues for reflection in the philosophy of mind, language, and technology.
The Nature of Scientific Justification: W.V.O Quine’s Coherentism Perspective Wahyudi, Imam; Arkhano, Rachmanda Aquila; Panjaitan, Gladwin
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 36, No 1 (2026): (Article in Press)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.107506

Abstract

W.V.O Quine is an American analytic philosopher of naturalism. His naturalist view has a tendency towards scientific positivism and empiricism. In the mid-20th century, he criticized the views of logical positivism which he thought were less radical. In continuity with his views, Quine has an epistemological style that is in line with scientific reasoning. This is shown by his coherentism justification theory which is described as a web of beliefs. Coherentism as justification assumes that beliefs are interconnected with each other. Thus, if a belief is justified, it will justify other beliefs. Through this coherentism, Quine's holism view that brings together the unity of analytic and synthetic constructions in language can be realized. Coherentism itself is the opposite of the view of foundationalism which considers that a justification requires a basic belief as a foundation. This paper aims to explain the style of justification and the history of Quine's scientific philosophy. This paper also aims to explain the implications of W.V.O. Quine's coherentism in the history of philosophy.
BLACK HOLE EVAPORATION AND THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ONTOLOGY OF PHYSICAL REALITY FROM A RELATIONAL AND COSMOLOGICAL EMERGENCE PERSPECTIVE Ariefka, Reza; Sahroni, Taufik Roni; Siagian, Ruben Cornelius; Nurahman, Arip; Raisal, Abu Yazid
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 36, No 1 (2026): (Article in Press)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.108753

Abstract

This research is motivated by developments in modern physics which show that black holes, which in classical general relativity are considered the most stable and permanent entities in the universe, actually undergo evaporation through Hawking radiation. This phenomenon has profound philosophical implications regarding the nature of physical existence, the status of information, the structure of space-time, and the direction of cosmological time. This study aims to analyze the ontological and epistemological implications of black hole evaporation in the context of micro-macro relationships, relational ontology, and the concept of time as an emergent phenomenon. This study uses a qualitative method based on literature review and conceptual analysis by integrating the perspectives of theoretical physics, philosophy of science, and modern cosmology. The results of this study show that black hole evaporation confirms that there are no physical entities that are absolute and permanent. Physical existence is more accurately understood as a relational phenomenon that depends on the interaction between space-time geometry, quantum fluctuations, and cosmic thermodynamic processes. Furthermore, the black hole information paradox can be understood as a limitation of human epistemological description, rather than an ontological loss of physical reality. This research also confirms that the direction of time is a consequence of the emergence of increased entropy in the universe. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of the phenomenon of black hole evaporation with a structural-relational ontological approach to explain physical reality as a dynamic and emergent process.
Exploring African Logic: The Interplay of Ubuntu, Ezumezu and Dialetheia Firdaus, Qusthan A. H.
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 36, No 1 (2026): (Article in Press)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.110589

Abstract

The African philosophical concept of Ubuntu, which posits that a person’s identity is fundamentally constituted through their relationship with others, presents a direct challenge to the foundational assumptions of classical Aristotelian logic. This article re-evaluates Ubuntu, moving beyond traditional philosophical interpretations to explore its compatibility with Ezumezu logic—an African logical system—and modern formal logic. I argue that the relational identity central to Ubuntu offers a powerful alternative to the core tenets of Aristotelian logic, particularly the principles of identity (A=A), non-contradiction (A and not A cannot both be true), and the excluded middle (A or not A must be true). Through the application of formal notation, this analysis provides a precise and unambiguous demonstration of how Ubuntu’s inherent relationality undermines these principles. Ultimately, this work reveals that Ubuntu finds a more fitting and expressive framework within Ezumezu logic. Furthermore, it provides strong philosophical support for modern dialetheism, the view that some contradictions can be true, thereby expanding our understanding of both African philosophy and the nature of truth itself.

Page 58 of 58 | Total Record : 580

 54   55   56   57   58 

Filter by Year

1990 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 36, No 1 (2026): (Article in Press) Vol 35, No 1-2 (2025): Special Issue 2025: Law and Politics Vol 35, No 2 (2025): (Article in Press) Vol 35, No 1 (2025) Vol 34, No 2 (2024) Vol 34, No 1 (2024) Vol 33, No 2 (2023) Vol 33, No 1 (2023) Vol 32, No 2 (2022) Vol 32, No 1 (2022) Vol 31, No 2 (2021) Vol 31, No 1 (2021) Vol 30, No 2 (2020) Vol 30, No 1 (2020) Vol 29, No 2 (2019) Vol 29, No 1 (2019) Vol 28, No 2 (2018) Vol 28, No 1 (2018) Vol 27, No 2 (2017) Vol 27, No 1 (2017) Vol 26, No 2 (2016) Vol 26, No 1 (2016) Vol 25, No 2 (2015) Vol 25, No 1 (2015) Vol 24, No 2 (2014) Vol 24, No 1 (2014) Vol 23, No 3 (2013) Vol 23, No 2 (2013) Vol 23, No 1 (2013) Vol 22, No 3 (2012) Vol 22, No 2 (2012) Vol 22, No 1 (2012) Vol 21, No 3 (2011) Vol 21, No 2 (2011) Vol 21, No 1 (2011) Vol 20, No 3 (2010) Vol 20, No 2 (2010) Vol 20, No 1 (2010) Vol 19, No 3 (2009) Vol 19, No 2 (2009) Vol 19, No 1 (2009) Vol 18, No 3 (2008) Vol 18, No 2 (2008) Vol 18, No 1 (2008) Vol 17, No 3 (2007) Vol 17, No 2 (2007) Vol 17, No 1 (2007) Vol 16, No 3 (2006) Vol 16, No 2 (2006) Vol 16, No 1 (2006) Vol 14, No 3 (2004) Vol 14, No 2 (2004) Vol 14, No 1 (2004) Vol 13, No 3 (2003) Vol 13, No 2 (2003) Vol 13, No 1 (2003) Vol 10, No 2 (2000) Jurnal Filsafat Seri 30 Oktober 1999 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 29 Juni 1999 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 28 Juli 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 27 Maret 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Edisi Khusus Agustus 1997 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 26 Desember 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 25 Mei 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 24 Februari 1996 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 23 November 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 22 Agustus 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 21 Mei 1995 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 20 Desember 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 19 Agustus 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 18 Mei 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 17 Februari 1994 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 16 November 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 15 Agustus 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 14 Mei 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 13 Februari 1993 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 12 November 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 11 Agustus 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 10 Mei 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 9 Februari 1992 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 8 November 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 7 Agustus 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 6 Mei 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 5 Februari 1991 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 4 November 1990 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 3 1990 Jurnal Filsafat Seri 1 1990 More Issue