cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
,
INDONESIA
Journal of Fiqh and Usul
Published by Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 303 Documents
 19   20   21   22   23 
Analysis of Sheikh Ansāri’s techniques for the criticism of chain of transmission of hÄ«dith دیمه کار, محسن; باقری, محمد مهدی
فقه و اصول سال. Û´Û¸, شماره. Û²: شماره پیاپی Û±Ã
Publisher : انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22067/fiqh.v48i25.36256

Abstract

Sheikh Murtaza Ansārai is regarded as one of the greatest Imamite jurists, and one of the prominent scholarly and juristic figures of the last centuries. His proficiency, originality and gumption are evident in his surviving works regarding problems in principles (usūl) and traditional-demonstrative jurisprudence. His precious researches on “investigation and criticism of chain of transmission of hadīth”, which manifest his skill and innovation in the science dealing with the transmitters (‘ilm al-rijāl) as well as principles of criticism of hadith, on the one hand, and the significant function of academic methodology in the present time, on the other hand, necessitates, more than any time before, a rereading of Sheikh Ansāri’s system of thought regarding traditional jurisprudence in general and the criticism of hadith in particular. The present descriptive analytical study, which is done with a lot of research on Sheikh Ansāri’s works on jurisprudence and its principles, seeks the introduction of Sheikh Ansāri’s methodology of systematic thinking concerning “the techniques of the criticism of chain of transmission of hadith” in traditional-demonstrative jurisprudence. Our investigations show that the most important techniques Sheikh Ansari applied in his criticism of chain of transmission of hadīth consist of the following items: paying atterntion to the personality characteristics of the transmitters (like the people of consensus (ashab al-ijma‘), trustworthy sheikhs (mashāyikh al-thiqa), Ahmad b. ‘Isā narrated from him (rawī ‘anh), sons of faḍḍāl (banī faḍḍāl)), paying attention to the concealment of the original teller of the hadīth (iḍmār-i hadīth), cohesion of the chain of transmitters (ittiṣāl-i sanad), mentioning the anonymity of the transmitters, paying attention to the sameness of the names of the transmitters, and compensation (injibār) for the weakness of hadīth.
A study into annulment (iqālah) from the perspective of Shiite jurisprudence and law گلباغی ماسوله, سید علی جبار
فقه و اصول سال. Û´Û·, شماره. Û´: شماره پیاپی Û±Ã
Publisher : انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22067/fiqh.v47i23.36273

Abstract

Annulment is one of the institutions of contract cancellation in Shiite jurisprudence and law. One of the primary questions about every phenomenon is the question of the nature and character. Although traditionally Shiite jurists have held comparative and critical approaches toward the common views of Sunni jurists about the nature of annulment, they have not typically looked at the nature of contract annulment from the perspective of Shia jurisprudence. The present article explores the nature of ‘annulment of contracts’ as a legal and jurisprudential institution from the perspective of scholars of Shiite jurisprudence and law by observing their major views. Thus, the paper aims to review and investigate their opinions and provided reasons in order to clarify the strength of their hypotheses and theories regarding the nature of contract annulment.
An examination of selling forbidden meat to unbelievers احمدپور, اکبر
فقه و اصول سال. Û´Û·, شماره. Û´: شماره پیاپی Û±Ã
Publisher : انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22067/fiqh.v47i23.36555

Abstract

The question has long been asked whether the meat of animals not purified in accordance with Islamic law and thus considered ‘dead’ can be sold to non-Muslims who do not adhere to Islamic legal purification. Can the profits of such a trade be earned and enjoyed, or will it be unlawful and prohibited? In fact, selling ‘the dead’ in terms of their non-food advantages, whether to Muslims or unbelievers, has been considered as permissible by a number of jurists. Nevertheless, as regards their trade for edible consumption, most jurists favor the jurisprudential theory advancing the prohibition of selling ‘the dead’ even to non-Muslims. The present article, however, is in favor of selling forbidden meat to unbelievers. Hence, this study analyzes and critiques the reasons proposed by those who consider this trade as prohibited. In addition, a number of reasons supporting the notion of permissibility will be provided.
Internet panderism from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence ایزدی فرد, علی اکبر; حسین نژاد, سید مجتبی
فقه و اصول سال. Û´Û¸, شماره. Û³: شماره پیاپی Û±Ã
Publisher : انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.37289

Abstract

Internet panderism, in today’s society, is a crime which, due to technological advances, has spread significantly and perhaps, in comparison to traditional panderism, it causes far more losses. Since it is unprecedented, the ruling of internet panderism has not been considered even by contemporary Islamic jurists. After mentioning some examples of internet panderism and a detailed review, the authors have relied on arguments such as the conduct of wise and basis emendation to prove that internet panderism is a crime. They have, finally, invoked the absoluteness of Abd Alla Ibn Sanan tradition and basis emendation and concluded that since the requirements of panderism with prescribed punishment (haddi panderism) are satisfied in such panderism, internet procurers will be punished by prescribed punishment (had) of panderism, if they bring individuals together with the intention that they commit illegitimate acts of adultery and sodomy.
An analysis and criticism of the arguments for the individuality of the hijab فلاح, فاطمه; ملك افضلی اردكانی, محسن
فقه و اصول سال. Û´Û·, شماره. Û²: شماره پیاپی Û±Ã
Publisher : انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22067/fiqh.v47i21.37517

Abstract

The hijāb is a religious obligation based on numerous sources and jurisprudential arguments. Some consider the hijāb as an individual and not a social issue, arguing that it essentially does not fall in the sphere of state interference and even other people’s intervention. The present paper discusses this important and critical issue within the responsibility domain of the Islamic state. Thus, by challenging the arguments of those who believe in the individuality of the hijāb, the paper aims to prove its sociality. The arguments are divided into two major categories: the juridical-legal and the Qur’anic, each of which find their appropriate responses in this paper. In addition, the jurisprudential aspect is studied more deeply. It should be noted, however, that the social essence of the hijāb and chastity, as well as the responsibility of the Islamic state as to protect and propagate the ideal, does not mean that the government should resort to force or judicial and penal measures for that purpose. Instead, on the basis of jurisprudential arguments, the state is obliged to adopt some of the best ways and mechanisms in order to encourage the people to exercise this good deed.
Non-Stipulation of Security from Loss in Commanding Right and Forbidding Wrong محسنی دهکلانی, محمد; ایزدی فرد, علی اکبر; منتظری, صالح
فقه و اصول سال. Û´Û¹, شماره. Û±: شماره پیاپی Û±Ã
Publisher : انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22067/jfu.v0i0.37732

Abstract

In legal works, the obligatoriness of commanding right and forbidding wrong has become restricted to stipulatory realization including “security against loss”. The jurists believe that commanding right and forbidding wrong has “a suspended and conditional obligatoriness” toward the stipulation of security from loss in such a way that when a depravity or loss follows commanding right and forbidding wrong, this obligatoriness does not have actuality and is voided. Having re-examined the issue, the writers consider the evidences of the generally accepted view as violable despite its enjoyment of “great publicity”. Briefly put, the writers believe that commanding right and forbidding wrong as a legal obligation has “an absolute and non-suspended obligatoriness” toward qualified condition.
Analysis of Principled Instruments of “Intellectuals’ Stipulation” with the Method of “Examining the Components of Its Words and Analysis of Functions and Conjectures” شیرازی, سید رضا
فقه و اصول سال. Û´Û¹, شماره. Û²: شماره پیاپی Û±Ã
Publisher : انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.39244

Abstract

Intellectuals’ stipulation is a principled instrument, that on one hand its sides and components have not been explored into in principles and on the other hand the mechanism of its acquisition to be used in jurisprudence has not been provided. In this article, with an examination of the definitions available about intellectuals’ stipulation and analysis of its application in jurisprudence and principles, this principled instrument will be scrutinized and after uncovering its sides and components and explaining its difference with “intellectuals’ unanimity”, the mechanisms employed in jurisprudence and principles for acquiring it will be examined and finally the mechanism for relying on intellectuals’ stipulation in jurisprudence and principles will be suggested.
Revisiting the authority of “alidjma almadraki” (idjma with known origins) شاکری, بلال
فقه و اصول سال. Û´Û¸, شماره. Û³: شماره پیاپی Û±Ã
Publisher : انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.39297

Abstract

Non-authority of “alidjma almadraki” (idjma with known origins) is a topic frequently raised in the Usulis’ contemporary literature. In this paper, the authority of “alidjma almadraki” has been studied through revisiting this idjma since the introduction of idjma in general by Shia scholars up to the present. The results of this study show that based on all foundations raised to prove the authority of idjma (hiss (intuition), lutf (benign), hads (surmise), etc.), one may assert that such idjma has authority or at least plays an important role in determining the minor premise of apparent meaning of sharia evidences and compensating for imperfection of their indication. Therefore, one may not consider idjma invalid and exclude it in deducting sharia percepts merely because its origins are known.
Explanation of the theory of “the obligation of breastfeeding by mother and the necessity of paying its related costs by father” from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence نظری توکلی, سعید; کراچیان ثانی, فاطمه
فقه و اصول سال. Û´Û¸, شماره. Û³: شماره پیاپی Û±Ã
Publisher : انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.39433

Abstract

According to the prevailing view in the Islamic jurisprudence since breastfeeding is not mothers duty, she is entitled to demand wage from her husband for breastfeeding her child. In this article, the authors intend to prove, through reviewing the evidences of this view and the alternative one, that there is a meaningful relationship between the following phrases: “if they breastfeed for you, pay their wage” and “ their maintenance and clothing must be borne by father” and that wage has no meaning other than meeting mother’s essential needs. This study has been performed in an analytical-descriptive method and the information was collected in library research method. After explaining the Quranology concepts and bases of the discussion, the Islamic jurisprudence texts will be analyzed and finally one of the raised views will be preferred over others. The conclusion is that breastfeeding is mother’s duty. During the marriage, mother is not permitted to demand wage from her husband in return of breastfeeding, unless the husband has consented to breastfeeding. After separation, mother is still obliged to breastfeed her child, but child’s father is bound to satisfy mother’s needs (food and clothing) in exchange for this service.
Analysis of the Nature and Effects of Surety for Standing Property in Jurisprudence and Iranian Law الشریف, محمدمهدی; قاسمی, رضا
فقه و اصول سال. Û´Û¹, شماره. Û³: شماره پیاپی Û±Ã
Publisher : انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.39557

Abstract

Following jurisprudence, civil law has considered contract of surety (ḍamān) as conveyor of obligation and has limited surety to general properties or debts. Although this definition results in an incorrect surety of external objects, this very law has not abided by this conclusion in article 679 and along with most of jurists has passed a judgment on the correctness of responsibility surety (ḍamān-i uhda), which is a part of surety for pledged standing property (ḍamān-i a‘yān-i maḍmūna). With the use of the proposition of uhda, which contrary to dhimma contains external objects, many of the contemporary jurists have considered the surety of standing property as an independent contract from surety of debts and with reliance on generalities have passed a judgment on the correctness of surety for standing property including both pledged and non-pledged as well as the correctness of insurance of the property that is in possession of its owner. On the basis of this analysis, the result of validation of external object on uhda is that the surety (guarantor) is first obliged to give back the property and in case of loss, will guarantee to give back a substitute to the owner. Given the generalities of law, such as article 10 of civil law, judgment on correctness of pledged standing property in statutory law is not encountered with a specific obstacle.

Page 21 of 31 | Total Record : 303

 19   20   21   22   23 

Filter by Year

0000


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue ???? 40 ????? 3: ????? ????? 81? ????? ? ?????? 1387 ???? 51 ????? 4: ????? ????? ??9? ?????????8 ???? 51 ????? 3: ????? ????? ??8? ????????8 ???? 51 ????? 2: ????? ????? ??7? ??????????8 ???? 51 ????? 1: ????? ????? ??6? ???? ???8 ???? 50 ????? 4: ????? ????? ??5? ?????? ???7 سال. Û´Ûµ, شماره. Û²: شماره پیاپی Û¹à سال. Û´Û·, شماره. Û´: شماره پیاپی Û±à سال. Û´Û¹, شماره. Û±: شماره پیاپی Û±à سال. Û´Û², شماره. Û±: شماره پیاپی Û¸à سال. Û´Û¶, شماره. Û³: شماره پیاپی Û¹à سال. Û´Û¹, شماره. Û´: شماره پیاپی Û±à سال. ÛµÛ°, شماره. Û³: شماره پیاپی Û±à سال. Û´Û°, شماره. Û²: شماره پیاپی Û¸à سال. Û´Ûµ, شماره. Û±: شماره پیاپی Û¹à سال. Û´Ûµ, شماره. Û´: شماره پیاپی Û¹à سال. Û´Û¸, شماره. Û±: شماره پیاپی Û±à سال. Û´Û¹, شماره. Û²: شماره پیاپی Û±à سال. Û´Û´, شماره. Û²: شماره پیاپی Û¸à سال. Û´Û¸, شماره. Û²: شماره پیاپی Û±à سال. Û´Û¸, شماره. Û³: شماره پیاپی Û±à سال. Û´Û±, شماره. Û²: شماره پیاپی Û¸à سال. Û´Û´, شماره. Û´: شماره پیاپی Û¹à سال. Û´Û³, شماره. Û±: شماره پیاپی Û¸à سال. Û´Û·, شماره. Û³: شماره پیاپی Û±à سال. ÛµÛ°, شماره. Û²: شماره پیاپی Û±à سال. Û´Û´, شماره. Û³: شماره پیاپی Û¹à سال. Û´Û´, شماره. Û±: شماره پیاپی Û¸à سال. Û´Ûµ, شماره. Û³: شماره پیاپی Û¹à سال. Û´Û·, شماره. Û±: شماره پیاپی Û±à سال. Û´Û¹, شماره. Û³: شماره پیاپی Û±à سال. Û´Û², شماره. Û²: شماره پیاپی Û¸à سال. Û´Û¶, شماره. Û´: شماره پیاپی Û¹à سال. Û´Û¸, شماره. Û´: شماره پیاپی Û±à سال. Û´Û±, شماره. Û±: شماره پیاپی Û¸à سال. Û´Û¶, شماره. Û²: شماره پیاپی Û¹à سال. Û´Û¶, شماره. Û±: شماره پیاپی Û¹à سال. Û´Û·, شماره. Û²: شماره پیاپی Û±à سال. ÛµÛ°, شماره. Û±: شماره پیاپی Û±à سال. Û´Û³, شماره. Û²: شماره پیاپی Û¸à More Issue