cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 347 Documents
 14   15   16   17   18 
STUDI IMPLEMENTASI PENDIDIKAN KARAKTER PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA PADA KELAS CERDAS ISTIMEWA BAKAT ISTIMEWA (CIBI) SMP NEGERI 2 SURAKARTA Munawaroh Munawaroh; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Budi Usodo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of research was to describe the implementation of character education to mathematics learning, the constraints the teacher faced and the solution the teachers took to the constraints with the implementation of character education in mathematics learning in the gifted and talented class of SMP Negeri 2 Surakarta. This study was a descriptive qualitative research; the subject of researcher was one mathematics teacher  and six students in the grade VII gifted and talented class. Techniques of validating data used were researcher persistence and time triangulation. Techniques of analyzing data used were (1) data reduction, (2) data display, and (3) conclusion drawing and verification. The results of research are as follows. 1) The process of character education implementation to learning was below. (a) The development of logical, critical, creative and innovative thinking character was conducted by means of assignment, directing the students to the correct answer and to make decision with debriefing. (b) The development of hard work character was conducted by means of group assignment. (c) The development of curiosity character was conducted by providing the example of material existing in real life. (d) The development of independency character was conducted by assigning the material reading to be discussed in the next meeting. (e) The development of self-confidence character was conducted by means of facilitating the students writing the result on the blackboard. 2) The constraints the teacher faced and the solutions the teacher took were as follows. (a) In the implementation of logical, critical, creative and innovative thinking character, the students monopolized actively the debriefing process so that the teacher should limit and provide other students the opportunity of asking question. (b) In the implementation of hard work character, not all students in the classroom had equal hard work ethos. The solutions taken were to play motivation video and to convince them about the ability they had, to display the students’ work, and to reward the students with the best performance. (c) In the implementation of curiosity character, the students who did not want to think too hard responded poorly to the stimulus given. In this case, the teacher could give reward in the form of mark (grade). (d) In the implementation of self-confidence character, the students with less self-confidence would select the easy assignment in presenting the group assignment, and they explained in very soft voice. The solutions taken were to give more mark to the students explaining group assignment, and to direct the students in the presentation. For teacher independency character, the teacher did not face a significant constraint.Keywords: Implementation, Character Education, Gifted and Talented Class.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN MISSOURI MATHEMATICS PROJECT (MMP) DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) DISERTAI ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING MELALUI TEMAN SEJAWAT DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMA DI KABUPATEN Purna Bayu Nugroho; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract. The purposes of this study were to determine: (1) which has better learning achievement, students are given MMP learning model with AfL through peers, STAD with the AfL through peers, or students who were given direct learning model, (2) which has better learning achievement, students with learning independence of high, moderate or low, (3) on each learning model, which one has the better learning achievement, students with learning independence of high, moderate or low, (4) in each learning independence category, which has better learning achievement, students are given MMP learning model with AfL through peers, STAD with AfL through peers or students who given direct learning model. This study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3 x 3 factorial design. The study populations were all of grade X students of Senior High School in Bantul. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples in this study amounted to 214 students with the details of 72 students for experiment 1 and 70 for experiments 2 and 72 for the control class. The data collected instrument used mathematics achievement tests and a questionnaire of student’s learning independence. Based on the hypothesis testing, it can be concluded as follows. (1) Students’ learning achievement treated by MMP learning model with the AfL better than students treated by STAD models with AfL and direct learning model. In addition, students’ learning achievement treated by STAD model with AfL through peers better than students treated by direct learning model. (2) Students’ learning achievement which has high learning independence better than students who have moderate and low independence. In addition, students who have moderate learning independence better than students who have low learning independence. (3) In the MMP learning model with the AfL through peers, STAD with AfL through peers and direct learning model, the students’ learning achievement who have high learning independence better than moderate and low learning independence, in addition the students’ learning achievement who have moderate learning independence better than students who have low learning independence. (4) In the learning independence category of high, moderate and low, the students’ learning achievement treated by MMP with the AfL through peers better than students treated by STAD with AfL through peers and direct learning model. In addition, students’ learning achievement treated by STAD with AFL through peers better than students treated by direct learning model.Keywords: Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP), Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD), Assessment for Learning (AfL), Peers, Student’s Learning Independence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION DAN PROBING-PROMPTING DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Kurniasari, Dewi; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning model toward learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the mathematics anxiety. The learning models of this research were cooperative learning model of the GI with Scientific Approach, the cooperative learning model of the Probing-Prompting with Scientific Approach, and classical learning model with Scientific Approach. This was a quasi-experimental study with 3×3 factorical design. The study population was all eighth grade students of state junior high school in Karanganyar District. The sample was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling method. The sample consisted of 280 students with 95 students in the first experimental class, 93 students in the second experimental class, and 92 students in the control class. Instruments used to colled data were mathematics achievement test and the student’s mathematics anxiety questionnaire. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows: 1) GI cooperative learning model with scientific approach gave better achievement than probing-prompting with scientific approach and classical learning model with scientific approach while probing-prompting and classical learning model with scientific approach gave same achievement, 2) the students with low mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety, and the students with moderate mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with high mathematics anxiety, 3) in all categories of student’s mathematics anxiety, GI cooperative learning model with scientific approach, Probing-Prompting cooperative learning model with scientific approach, and classical learning model with scientific approach gave the same learning achievement in mathematics, 4) in the GI cooperative learning model with scientific approach and Probing-Prompting cooperative learning model with scientific approach, the students with low mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety, and the students with moderate mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with high mathematics anxiety. In the classical learning model with scientific approach, the students with low mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety, while the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety had the same achievement.Keywords: Group Investigation (GI), Probing-Prompting, Classical Instruction, Scientific Approach, Mathematics Anxiety, Learning Achievement in Mathematics.
PENGEMBANGAN BUKU ELEKTRONIK TRIGONOMETRI DENGAN MENGINTEGRASIKAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS, TEKNOLOGI, SEJARAH, DAN APLIKASI TRIGONOMETRI Ika Wulandari; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed (1) to formulate the need of trigonometric book content, (2) to develop prototype into trigonometric electronic book, and (3) to find out the result of evaluation on the feasibility of electronic book developed for teachers’ candidates, teachers, and trigonometric instructors. A research and development method was used to provide a trigonometric electronic book. This method encompassed the following stages: (1) exploring: analyzing library study and case study, (2) developing: designing the product until it became a trigonometric electronic book, and (3) evaluating: studying  the feasibility of trigonometric electronic book. The results were reveals as follows: 1) The identification of trigonometric content should pay attention to: (a) geometric reasoning and understanding such as: symbol, distance, pythagorean theorem, circle, triangle, angle, and pi concept, (b) function reasoning and understanding such as: representation (numeric, chart, symbolic/algebraic, verbal), and representation interrelationship, (c) trigonometric function reasoning and understanding such as: definitions of function based on unit circle, based on right triangle side ratio, multiple representation and property in trigonometric main function, (d) history and the chronology of trigonometric function inception, and (e) the application of trigonometric function in real world. 2) The development of prototype into trigonometric electronic book was conducted with the following procedures: (a) design analysis based on the identification of book content need, (b) the development of book content, (c) the alignment of illustration, chart, table, game, video and layout, (d) designing the application (.exe), electronic book pdf and html, 3) Expert judgment: material expert rated 4.07 (Good), media expert rated 4.03 (Good). The result of evaluation showed that: (a) in Trial I, the product users’ candidates rated 4.95 (Very Good) for material aspect and 4.8 (Very Good) for media aspect, (b) in Trial II, the product users’ candidates rated 4.79 (Very good) for material aspect, and 4.61 (Very Good) for media aspect. Considering the result of feasibility test of materials and media expert, trials I and II for feasibility test of users’ candidates, this trigonometric electronic book was feasible to be used as the handout for the students as teachers’ candidates, teachers, and trigonometric instructors.Keywords: trigonometric electronic book, mathematic reasoning, technology, history, and trigonometric application.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) DAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KONSEP DIRI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA DI SMP NEGERI E-KABUPATEN BLORA Yekti Putri Kusumaningtyas; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one is better among learning models of Think Talk Write (TTW), Numbered Head Together (NHT) or conventional one in giving mathematics learning achievement, (2) which one is better among students’ levels of self concept, students having high, medium or low self concept in giving mathematics learning achievement. (3) in each learning model, which one is better among students’ levels of self concept in having mathematics learning achievement and (4) in each level of self concept, which one is better among Think Talk Write (TTW), Numbered Head Together (NHT) or conventional model in giving mathematics learning achievement. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Blora. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were 309 students; consist of 105 students in the first experimental class, 105 in the second experimental class, and 99 students in control class. The instruments used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and questionnaire of self concept. Pre-requisite tests were used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it showed that the data had same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data are examined by using one-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. It showed that three classes had balance prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed that: (1) Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) learning models had better achievement than conventional model, Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) learning models had the same mathematics achievement, (2) the students having high self concept had better learning achievement than those having medium and low self concept, the students having medium and low self concept had the same mathematics learning achievement, (3) in each learning model: the students having high self concept had better learning achievement than those having medium and low self concept, the students having medium and low self concept had the same mathematics learning achievement, (4) in each level of self concept: Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) model better learning achievement than conventional model, Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) model had the same good mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: Think Talk Write (TTW), Numbered Head Together (NHT), mathematics learning achievement, and self concept.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION, THINK-PAIR-SHARE, DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI EKSPONEN DAN LOGARITMA DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI KABUPATEN PACITAN Suprapto Suprapto; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Imam Sujadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to know the influence of teaching and learning models with the scientific approach toward the students’ achievement in learning mathematics considered from the creativity of the students. Teaching and learning models to be compared were GI, TPS, and PBL. This research was chategorized as a quasi experimental research. The population was all students of grade X MIA public SMAs in Pacitan regency in the year 2014/2015. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The method of data collection were documentation, questionaire, and test. Hypothesis testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. The conclusions of this research were as follows. 1. The students’ achievement in mathematics given GI-S model was better than those who were given TPS-S model, while the students’ achievement given GI-S was the same as those who were given PBL-S model, and the students’ achievement given TPS-S model was the same as those who were given  PBL-S model;  2. The mathematics achievement of the students who had high level creativity was the same as those who had  medium level creativity, while those who had  high level creativity was better than those who had  low level creativity, and the students with medium level gave the same achievement as those with low level creativity; 3. In high level creativity, the students’ achievement in learning mathematics using GI-S model was the same as those using TPS-S and PBL-S models. In medium level creativity, the students using GI-S model gave the same achievement as those using TPS-S and PBL-S models, but the students’ achievement using  PBL-S model was better than using TPS-S model. In low level creativity, the students who learned mathematics using GI-S model gave the same achievement as those who used TPS-S and PBL-S models, and the students’ achievement using TPS-S model was the same as those using PBL-S model; 4. In learning mathematics using GI-S model, the students with high, medium, and low level creativity gave the same achivement. In using TPS-S model, the students with high, medium, and low level creativity gave the same achievement. In using PBL-S, the students with high level creativity had the same achievement as those who had medium and low level creativity, but the students with medium level creativity gave better achievement than those who had low level creativity.Keywords: Group Investigation (GI), Think Pair Share (TPS), Problem Based Learning (PBL), Scientific approach, Creativity
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN GUIDED NOTE TAKING (GNT) PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN BEKERJA SAMA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP/MTs NEGERI DI KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Nindia Elisie Anggraini; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Budi Usodo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which of the TPS-GNT learning model, the TPS learning model, and the direct learning model results in a better mathematics learning achievement; (2) which of the students with high, mediun, and low team work have a better mathematics learning achievement; and (3) which of team work of the students result in a better learning achievement for each learning models; and (4) which of the TPS-GNT, TPS and direct learning models result in a better learning achievement for each level of team work of the students.This research used the quasi-experimental method. The population of this research was all students of the junior secondary schools in Surakarta in the academic year of 2013/2014. The samples of this research consisted of 288 students who were divided into three experiment groups. The three groups consisted of group 1, group 2, and group 3. Both of group 1 and group 2 consisted of 193 students whereas group 3 consisted of 95 students. The data of this research were gathered from test of learning achievement in mathematics, questionnaire, and documentation. The data were then analyzed by using umbalanced Two-way Analysis of Variance. According to the research results, it can be concluded: (1) the learning model of Modified TPS was better than that of the TPS and direct learning models while the learning model of TPS was better than the direct learning model; (2) the students with high team work had a better learning achievement than those with medium and low team work while the students with medium team work was better than the low team work; and (3) in each team work, student with high team work, medium team work, and low team work,  the mathematics learning achievement of the students taught with TPS-GNT learning model, TPS learning model, and direct learning model was as good as that of those; (4) in each learning model, the TPS-GNT, TPS and direct learning models, the learning achievement of the student with high team work, medium team work, and low team work, was as good as that of those.Keywords: TPS-GNT learning model, TPS learning model, direct learning model, team work and learning achievement.
PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA BERORIENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS) PADA MATERI TURUNAN UNTUK SISWA KELAS IX IPA PROGRAM AKSELERASI Sumanah Sumanah; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this study were: (1) to develop a valid mathematics learning set which is oriented to Creative Problem Solving (CPS) learning model in the topic of derivative on  XI Acceleration grade, and (2) to determine which learning model produces better learning achievement,  the developing CPS or the conventional model in the topic of derivative on XI Acceleration grade. The development of learning set in this study were observed from five aspects, they are: (1) the expert's validity, (2) the students' activity, (3) the teacher's capability in managing teaching and learning process, (4) the students' response to the learning process, and (5) the students' mathematics learning  achievement. This study was a development study of learning set done by applying a modified 4-D Thiagarajan model. There were three phases involved in this study; i.e. defining, designing, and developing. The subjects of the study were the students of SMA N 1 Pati grade XI acceleration year 2013/2014 as the experiment class and the students of SMA 1 Kudus grade XI acceleration year 2013/2014 as the control class. The data was collected by using validation sheet of learning set, observation sheet of teacher's capability in managing teaching and learning process, observation sheet of students' activity, students'response questionnaire, and test of students' learning achievement. Data analysis was done by descriptive and inferential statistics. The learning set produced is valid, because it has been validated with high score, that is 4.41 and after finishing the experiment, the results fulfill the pre-requirements, defined as follows: it leads to productive students' activity with average score of 4,25 having a positive effect, teacher's capability in managing teaching and learning process is very good with the score above 4,20, students' response toward the teaching and learning process is positive with the precentage above 80%, and learning achievement test is proven to be valid, reliable. Moreover, the teaching and learning process with CPS model with developing learning set is effective, because the experiment showed that the average score of learning achievement of the student is better than the conventional model.Keywords : Creative Problem Solving (CPS), The learning  set
EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE CONCEPT MAPPING GROUP RESUME(CMGR) DAN CONCEPT MAPPING (CM) DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI PESERTA DIDIK Arlin Astriyani
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to investigate: (1) which type more effective, a CMGR type, a CM type, or a Direct Instruction, (2) which one had a better mathematics achievement, students who had high, middle or low motivation students, (3) in each CMGR type, a CM type or Direct Instruction model, which one had a better mathematics achievement, students who had high, middle, or low motivation (4) in each motivation students (high, middle and low), which one more effective, students taught by a CMGR type, a CM type, or a Direct Instruction. We used the fifth grade students of elementary school in Nusawungu Subdistrict as the population. This study was a quasi experimental research by 3 x 3 factorial design. The instruments used to collect data are prior ability test in mathematics, a motivation questionnaire and achievement test in mathematics. The data were analyzed using unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the data analyzed, it was concluded that: (1) a CMGR type had better mathematics achievement than a CM type and a Direct Intruction, and a CM type had better mathematics achievement than a Direct Instruction, (2) the high motivation students had better mathematics achievement than the middle and low motivation students, and the middle motivation students had better mathematics achievement than the low motivation students, (3) for all types of learning model, high motivation students had better mathematics achievement than middle and low motivation students, (4) for high and middle motivation students, a CMGR type more effective than a CM type and Direct Instruction, and for low motivation students, a CM type more effective than a CMGR type and Direct Instruction.Keywords : Concept Mapping Group Resume (CMGR), Concept Mapping (CM), Direct Instruction, Motivation, Mathematics Achievement.
PROSES BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF SISWA SMA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH PADA MATERI TURUNAN FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI EFIKASI DIRI (Studi Kasus pada Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri Punung) Genarsih, Tunjung; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Mardiyana, Mardiyana
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to describe the process of reflective thinking in solving the problem of high school students on the material terms of the derivative function viewed from self-efficacy. This research is classified in the qualitative descriptive study with the case study method. The subjects in this study were students of class XI IPA SMAN I Punung Pacitan in the second semester of academic year 2014/2015. The determination of the subject is by using purposive sampling, which is based on high, medium, and low self-efficacy. The research data taken from the test results of student works  and interviews of  students. Test of the credibility of the data is done by time triangulation. The data analysis technique is qualitative descriptive by Miles and Huberman. The results showed that (1) students with high self-efficacy using reflective thinking processes in a) stages of understanding the problem, able to select science, believing the truth, and actively create a consideration of the chosen solution; b) planning phase troubleshooting, make certain considerations, believing the truth, and select science; c) the stage of implementing the plan problem solving, able to explain the problem solving, linking information obtained by the problems encountered, deliberation, aware of the error and correct it, believing the truth; d) phase re-examine, re-examine, capable of linking the knowledge, correcting the error, explaining the final conclusion. (2) students with moderate self-efficacy use reflective thinking process in a) understand the problem, believing the truth, actively make judgments, and able to select science; b) the stage of implementing the plan problem solving, able to explain the solution of the problem, select the science that has been owned, believing the truth of solving the problem (3) students with low self-efficacy only use reflective thinking process in understanding the problem by being active characteristics in making judgments, be sure it is a correct problem-solving solutions.Keywords: reflective thinking, problem solving, mathematics, self-efficacy.

Page 16 of 35 | Total Record : 347

 14   15   16   17   18 

Filter by Year

2013 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue