cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 347 Documents
 13   14   15   16   17 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING (DL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP NEGERI KELAS VII DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS Fadlilah, Umi; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of the research were to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from anxiety mathematics learning. The learning models compared were direct, PBL with scientific approach, and DL with scientific approach. This was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population were all students of Junior High School in Banyumas. The samples are the students of SMPN 1 Patikraja, SMPN 2 Patikraja, and SMPN 2 Kalibagor, taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and anxiety mathematics learning. The data analysis technique used unbalanced two ways anova. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The students receiving PBL with scientific approach to DL with scientific approach achievement than those receiving direct learning model. The students receiving PBL with scientific approach and DL with scientific approach had the same learning outcome. (2) Students with lower levels of mathematics anxiety learning had better learning outcome than students with medium and high anxiety level. Students’ learning anxiety level on math was better in their learning outcome than students with high levels of learning anxiety mathematics. (3) In each group, the anxiety level of students learning mathematics, learning model PBL with scientific approach and learning model DL with scientific approach provides better performance than direct learning model, learning model PBL with scientific approach produces the same learning outcome with learning model DL with scientific approach. (4) In each of the learning model, students with lower levels of anxiety level of mathematics learning outcome had better math outcome than students with medium and high math anxiety level learning, students learn math anxiety levels were to have better learning outcome than students with high levels of anxiety learn mathematics.Keywords: Direct learning model, PBL learning model with scientific approach, DL learning model with scientific approach, Math Anxiety Learning
PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH PADA MATERI POKOK FAKTORISASI BENTUK ALJABAR DI KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 1 SURAKARTA Siti Suprihatiningsih; Imam Sujadi; Dewi Retno Sari S
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this study were to describe: (1) the students with high-ability mathematical reasoning on problems solving of algebra factorization in eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Surakarta, (2) the students with  moderate-ability mathematical reasoning in problem solving of algebra factorization of eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Surakarta, (3) the students with low-ability mathematical reasoning in problem solving of the algebra factorization material in eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Surakarta. This research was a qualitative case study type. The research subjects were taken from eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Surakarta. The subjects amounted to 9 students consisting of 3 students with high ability, three students with moderate ability, and 3 students with low ability. The research data were in the form of written and oral data. Written data were obtained from the research subject test on written test instruments. The oral data obtained from the think aloud verbal conducted by researchers to the study subject. The techniques of analyzing the data were: (a) data reduction (b) presention of data (c) conclusion. The results showed that the students with high-ability reasoning mathematical were: (a) understand the problem, the students read the questions carefully and write down the information that is known of the problem and write down what was being asked of the problem; (b) present the mathematical expressions and perform calculations, students write a mathematical equation to calculate by used the operations of addition, subtraction and multiplication algebra fluently; (c) submit the notion and manipulation of mathematics, students write the answer to determine the length and width of the rice field by factoring and write down the factoring results that obtained; (d) drawn the conclusions, students write the length and width of the rice fields and multiplying the factoring results obtained to convince answers that obtained. The students with moderate-ability reasoning mathematical were: (a) understand the problem, students read the question after it write down the information that was known from the problem and write down what was being asked of the problem; (b) present the mathematical expressions and perform calculations, students write a mathematical equation to calculate by using the operations of addition, subtraction and multiplication algebra although this was used long time to write mathematical expressions and perform calculation, but students were get the expected rice fields wide. The students with low-ability mathematical reasoning were: understand the problem, students read again and again but still confused after it write down the information that was known from the problem and write down what was being asked of the problem. Keywords: mathematics, reasoning, problem solving
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STRUCTURED NUMBERED HEADS (SNH) DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN PENDEKATAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK PADA PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA Raodatul Jannah; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

models of SNH type, NHT type with realistic Mathematics approach, and conventional type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics of the students; (2) which of the high, the medium, and the low independence of learning of the students results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics; (3) for each category of independence of learning of the students, which one results in better achievement in Mathematics, cooperative learning model of SNH type, NHT type with realistic Mathematics approach, and conventional type; and (4) for each learning model, which one results in better achievement in Mathematics, students who have high, middle, or low independence of learning. This research used quasi-experimental research method. The population of this research was the eleventh (8th) grade students of the state junior high schools in Mataram in the first semester of the academic year of 2012/2013. This research used stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP Negeri 15 Mataram, SMP Negeri 8 Mataram, SMP Negeri 9 Mataram. The data of the research were collected through documentation, questionnaire, and test. The data were then analyzed by using the unbalanced Two-Way Analysis of Variance at the significance level of 0.05. The results of the research are as follows: (1) the SNH type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics of the students than cooperative learning model of NHT type and conventional type, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics of the students than conventional type; (2) the learning achievement of the students with the high independence of learning results in a better achievement than the learning achievement of the students with the middle and low independence of learning and the learning achievement of the students with the middle independence of learning give the same mathematics achievement as the low independence of learning; (3) for each category of independence of learning of the students, cooperative learning model of SNH type results in better achievement in Mathematics than cooperative model NHT type and conventional type, and cooperative learning model NHT type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics of the students than conventional type; and (4) for each learning model, the learning achievement of the students with the high independence of learning results in a better achievement than the learning achievement of the students with the middle and low independence of learning and the learning achievement of the students with the middle independence of learning results as good as in the low independence of learning.Keywords: Cooperative learning model of SNH type, NHT type, realistic Mathematics approach, and independence of learning of the students
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI SIKAP SISWA TERHADAP MATEMATIKA DAN PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi; Ardianzah, Ferri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of cooperatif learning models viewed from the attitude of students. The learning model compared were TAI-CTL, TAI and direct instruction. This was quasi-experimental research designed by factorial 3x3. The population was 8th grade students of junior high school even semester academic year 2013/2014 in Magetan regency. The sample was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling. Total sample was 231 students, consisted of 77 students as TAI-CTL class, 78 students as TAI class, and 76 students as direct instruction class. Hypothesis testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testing, it is concluded that: (1) students learns using TAI-CTL and TAI had better achievement than students learnt using direct instruction, students learnt using TAI-CTL had better achievement than students learnt using TAI  (2) positive attitude students had better achievement than those of neutral and negative attitudestudents, neutral attitude students had better achievement than negative attitude students (3) for TAI-CTL and TAI, students with positive attitude had better achievement than neutral and negative attitude, however neutral attitude students had the same achievement as negative attitude students, for direct instruction, positive attitude students had the same achievement as neutral attitude students, meanwhile positive attitude students had better achievement than negative attitudeand students with neutral attitude had the same achievement as negative attitude students (4) for  positive attitude students, students learnt using TAI-CTL had the same achievement as students learnt using TAI, meanwhile students learnt using TAI-CTL and TAI had better achievement than students learnt using direct instruction, for neutral and negative attitude students, students learnt using TAI-CTL, TAI, and direct instruction had the same achievement.Keywords: TAI-CTL, TAI, Direct Instruction, Attitude 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENTS (TGT) DENGAN METODE DISCOVERY PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN ROKAN HULU TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Nurrahmawati Nurrahmawati; Budiyono Budiyono; Imam Sujadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose  of this study are to determine the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the spatial intelligence of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the TGT type with discovery method, the cooperative learning model of the TGT type, and the direct instruction  model. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The study population was all grade VIII students of Junior High School in Rokan Hulu Regency. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and spatial intelligence test. Based on the hypothesis, the results could be concluded as follows.  (1) Students who were treated with the Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) cooperative learning model with discovery method had better learning achievement than students treated by TGT models and direct instruction model. In addition, students who were treated with the TGT model gave the same achievement with students treated by direct instruction model. (2) Students with high spatial intelligence had better learning achievement than the students with middle and low spatial intelligence. In addition, students who had middle spatial intelligence have better learning achievement than students who had low spatial intelligence. (3) In the spatial intelligence category of high, middle and low, the students’ learning achievement treated Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) cooperative learning model with discovery method was better than the students treated by TGT and direct instruction models. In addition, students treated by TGT model gave the same learning achievement with students treated by direct instruction model. (4) In the Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) cooperative learning model with discovery method, TGT model and direct instruction model, the students who had high spatial intelligence had better learning achievement than middle and low spatial intelligence. In addition, the students who had middle spatial intelligence had better learning achievement than students who had low spatial intelligence.Keywords: Teams Games Tournaments (TGT), Disccovery  Method,  Spatial Intelligence.
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING DITINJAU DARI KEAKTIFAN BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013 Sabar Santosa; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Sutrima Sutrima
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This research aimed to reveal which have a better mathematics achievement of students taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type using CTL, those taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type, or those taught by conventional learning model based on the students’ learning activeness. This research was a quasi-experimental research with the 3x3 factorial design. The population was all the 7rd grader studens of SMP Negeri in Karanganyar regency on academic year 2011/2012. The techniques of data collection were documentation, questionnaires and test method. Prior to balance test, a pre-requisite tests analysis (normality and homogenity test). The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the unbalanced two ways analysis of variance and multiple comparative test with the Sceffe’s test. The result indicates: (1) the mathematics achievement of students taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type using CTL was better than that of students taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type and that of students taught by conventional learning model, and the mathematics achievement of students taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type was better than that of students taught by conventional learning model, (2) the mathematics achievement of the students wth high learning activeness was better than that of students with middle and low learning activeness, and the mathematics achievement of the students wth middle learning activeness was better than that of students with low learning activeness, (3) in the TAI using CTL, the mathematics achievement of the students with high learning activeness was as good as that of the students with the middle learning activeness or the low learning activeness, and in the TAI and in the conventional learning model, the mathematics achievement of the students with the high learning activeness was better than that of the students with the low learning activeness, but was the same that of the students with the middle learning activeness, meanwhile, the mathematics achievement of the students with the middle learning activeness was the same that of the students with the low learning activeness, and (4) in the high learning activeness, the students taught by cooperative learning of the TAI type using CTL, those taught by cooperative learning of the TAI type, and those taught by conventional learning model have the same mathematics achievement, meanwhile, in the middle learning activeness and in the low learning activeness, the mathematics achievement of the students taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type using CTL was better than that of the students taught by conventional learning model, but was the same that of the students taught by cooperative learning model of the TAI type, and the mathematics achievement of the students taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type was the same that of the students taught by conventional learning model. Keywords: TAI using CTL, TAI, Conventional, Learning Activeness, Learning Achievement of Mathematics.  
PROSES INTEGRASI SIKAP SOSIAL DAN SPIRITUAL DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA PADA SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI DI KECAMATAN PURWODADI Asmarawati, Endah; Riyadi, Riyadi; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this study were to describe: (1) how the teachers prepared learning activities to integrate social and spiritual attitude, (2) the integration of social and spiritual attitude in teaching and learning, (3) how teachers assessed the social and spiritual attitudes. Qualitative research was applied in this research.The subjects of the research were seventh grade mathematics teachers in Purwodadi Subdistrict and the subjects selection criteria were based on teachers who had followed the training curriculum in 2013 and recommended by the headmaster of the schools. The subjects are selected based on specific criteria by using  snowball sampling technique. Source of data derived from informants (teachers and students), documentation and learning process. The data collection technique was done by observation, interviews and documentation. Data analysis used Miles and Huberman’s concept that are data collection, data reduction, presenting the data, and drawing the conclusion. The validity of the data used source triangulation. The results of the study could be concluded as follows. (1) Preparation of learning activities to integrade spiritual attitude made by reviewing KI 1, choose the appropriate KD, making the indicator, developing the material, made the instrument to measure the spiritual attitude. While the preparation of learning activities that integrate social attitudes conducted by reviewing KI 2, choose the appropriate KD, making the indicator, developing the material, made the instrument to measure social attitudes. (2) Integration process of spiritual attitudes was conducted by the teachers in preliminary activities and in the core activities by providing motivation or encouragement, direction, and warning to students through a set of examples of Gods creation that is in their everyday lives. Spiritual attitudes developed by teachers were grateful and fear of God Almighty. Integration process of social attitudes conducted by teachers in preliminary activities, core activities and close activities with the teacher giving cover modelling, assignment, and referrals through examples of phenomena that exist in everyday life associated with the material set. Social attitudes developed by teachers were discipline, mutual help, caring, responsibility and tolerance. (3) The teachers made assessment of spiritual attitude in three ways: observation, journals and self-assessment. The teachers made assessment of social attitudes in three ways: observation, journals and peer assessment.Keywords: attitudes integration process, social attitudes, spiritual attitude, attitude assessment process.
KREATIVITAS DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH GEOMETRI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMPN 1 ARJOSARI KABUPATEN PACITAN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF DAN GENDER Ariska Yuliana Putri; Riyadi Riyadi; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to describe male and female students creativity of class VIII SMPN 1 Arjosari District of Pacitan that has a Field Dependent and Field Independent cognitive style in solving space geometric problem. This was a qualitative research. These subjects were taken using purposive sampling and snowball sampling. The subjects of this research were the students in the eight grade of SMPN 1 Arjosari. Data collection techniques in this research were GEFT, creativity test and interview. Techniques to validate the data were time triangulation. The data analysis technique used was the concept of Miles and Huberman consisted of data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The aspect of creativity in this research were consists of  four aspects, there were fluency,  flexibility, originality and elaboration. Students less creative if they do not meet the four aspects of creativity, quite creative if they meet one, two and three aspects of creativity and creative if they meet the four aspects of creativity. The results showed that male students that have Field Dependent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet one of the creativity aspects which is fluency. The male students that have Field Independent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet two creativity aspects which are fluency and elaboration. The female students that have Field Dependent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet two creativity aspects which are fluency and elaboration. The female students that have Field Independent in solving problems are quite creative because they meet three creativity aspects which are fluency, flexibility and elaboration. So the male and female students that have Field Dependent and Field Independent have a quite creative but it are different in each aspect of creativity.Keywords: creativity, problem solving, cognitive style, gender.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) PADA POKOK BAHASAN KUBUS DAN BALOK DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN KLATEN Rahayu Sri W; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Mardiyana Mardiyana
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT : The research aims to find out: (1) which students have the better learning achievement, the students who apply conventional learning model, TAI type of cooperative learning model, or GI type, (2) which students have the better learning achievement, the students who have high, medium, or low learning activities, (3) for each learning activities category, which of conventional learning model, TAI type of cooperative learning model, or GI type gives the better learning achievement, (4) for each type of learning model, which of the students with high, medium, or low learning activities gives the better learning achievement. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3 ´ 3 research design. The population was the grade VIII students of Public Junior High Schools in Klaten Regency in the second semester of grade year 2012/2013. Sampling technique was done by stratified cluster random sampling. Technique of analyzing data used was an unbalanced two way analysis of variance. Based on the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that: (1) the students who apply TAI type of cooperative learning model and GI type have mathematics learning achievement better than conventional learning model, while TAI type of cooperative learning model gives mathematics learning achievement as good as GI type, (2) the students with high activities has the best mathematics learning achievement compared to the students with medium or low activities, while the students with medium activities are better than the students with low activities, (3) for each activities categories of high, medium, and low, TAI type of cooperative learning model and GI type give mathematics learning achievement better than conventional learning model, while TAI type of cooperative learning model gives mathematics learning achievement as good as GI type, (4) for each learning models of conventional, TAI type, and GI type, the students with high activities has the best mathematics learning achievement compared to the students with medium or low activities, while the students with medium learning activities are better than the low one in the subject matter of the cube and block. Keywords: TAI, GI, Conventional, The Learning Activities.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING (DL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA Wicaksana, Hafid; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to know: (1) which one of thelearning models give a better achievement between PBL, DL, or classical with scientific approach, (2) which one has a better achievement between the student categorization, climbers, campers, or quitters, (3) at adversity quotient categorization, which one of the learning models give a better achievement between PBL, DL, or classical with scientific approach, and 4) at each the learning models, which one of the adversity quotient have a better achievement between student categorization, climbers, campers, or quitters. This was a quasi-experimental study. The research population were the seventh-grade students of all state junior high schools in Sukoharjo Regency in the academic year of 2014/2015. The data were analyzed through hypothesis testing using two-way ANOVA with unequal cells.Based on the analysis, the following conclusions are drawn. 1) The PBL model generates better learning outcomes than the DL model and the classical learning model using scientific approaches. The DL model generates better learning outcomes than the classical learning model using scientific approaches. 2) The students in the climber category have better learning outcomes than those in the camper category and the ones in the quitter category. The students in the camper category have better learning outcomes than those in the quitter category. 3) In the climber category, the students taught using the scientific PBL model have better learning outcomes in mathematics than those taught either using the scientific DL model or the classical learning model with scientific approaches. In the camper category, the students taught using the scientific PBL model have equal learning outcomes in mathematics to those taught using the scientific DL model but they have better learning outcomes than the students of the same category taught using the classical learning model with scientific approaches. 4) In relation to the PBL model using scientific approaches, the learning outcomes of the students in the climber category are better than those in the categories of campers and quitters. The students in the camper category have equal learning outcomes to those in the quitter category. In relation to the DL model using scientific approaches, the learning outcomes of the students in the climber category are equal to those in the camper category and better than those in the quitter categories.Keywords: Problem-Based Learning, Discovery Learning, Classical, Scientific Approaches, Adversity Quotient, Achievement.

Page 15 of 35 | Total Record : 347

 13   14   15   16   17 

Filter by Year

2013 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue